Quick Simple solution for Indirect Buys.
Overall Satisfaction with Coupa
We mainly use Coupa for the procurement of indirect materials and services. The purchases/invoices will be checked for compliance with corporate requirements (e.g., are the Correct Cost elements used, does it exceed the given budget, etc.) and then sent for approval as appropriate, based on the organization's setup and the dollar amount of the requested item.
Pros
- Visibility and control over Spendings.
- Compliance to corporate standards.
- Routing for approval.
Cons
- Handling of multiple currencies and conversion.
- Support for another language - not just display, but also data entry (e.g., Vendor name in a foreign language).
- Lots of integration work with SAP to make it work.
- Compliance increase more than 50%.
Do you think Coupa delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Coupa's feature set?
Yes
Did Coupa live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Coupa go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Coupa again?
Yes
Evaluating Coupa and Competitors
Yes - -Confidential.
- Cloud Solutions
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
-Features for international support, e.g., Currency, Language, Local Taxes, etc.
-Probably would focus more on the international support features. While Coupa claims to support many international features, they are only superficial in nature. E.g. In Asian countries like Japan, Thailand, and Taiwan, the name may be in both the native language and English. We want to be able to support both.
Coupa Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Knowledgeable team Kept well informed Support understands my problem | None |
-No .. Budgetary concerns.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation