Great Repository tool for Research Teams
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
I use Dovetail as our primary repository for our research artifacts, which include recorded video and written documents. Dovetail addresses our need to access a large library of research insights across several products in my organization. Dovetail also addresses the need for researchers to have a central place of storage for unstructured data such as video files from interviews, and easy transcription of these files.
Pros
- Auto-transcription of videos in an easy and fast way
- Smart search functionality to make it easy to find what you are looking for
- Ability to create folders and organize our materials in an intuitive way for our stakeholders to find what they need
Cons
- Although I think the smart search features which were launched within the last year or so are great, I would like to see more genAI-driven features. For example, auto-summarization of documents uploaded would be great.
- I think DT could make it a little easier for researchers to know how to categorize their files. When I want to create a 'space' for a new project I choose 'Project' but others on my team choose other categories, so there is no consistency in how we understand the same thing.
- DT needs to make their tagging process easier to do. It takes my researchers a long time to set up tagging across all files. I think this is something where genAI can help.
Likelihood to Recommend
DT is the best repository service I have used for a team that supports a diverse array of products with research. It is great when you have multiple categories of products but also of research types. For use cases of research teams with very simple needs (i.e. 1 product supported, <20 reports a year) they could probably just use existing free tools in their org, such as sharepoint.
