High quality leads, competitive pricing
May 03, 2022
High quality leads, competitive pricing
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with DemandScience Activate (formerly PureB2B)
I've used DemandScience Activate (formerly PureB2B) across 3 companies now. They are a key part of our thought leadership distribution program and top-of-funnel lead gen activities. We find the leads to be of better quality than those from other sources. We've experimented with some of their programs beyond content distribution, including some ABM, but find content syndication works best for our nurturing process.
Pros
- Easy to understand reporting
- Quick to launch and augment programs
- Competitive pricing
Cons
- Their intent programs get mixed reaction from our SDRs
- More options to try different services with lower investments to start
- Would love to see an annual conference (if one exists, I'm not aware of it)
- Database size
- Detailed reporting
- Competitive pricing
- Always hit the lead count within the timeframe agreed to
- Great for building awareness within our target audience
- Expand our database with contacts that are exploring solutions in our industry
- Have generated several million dollars in opportunity pipeline from their leads
- TechTarget Advertising Media & Services and TechTarget Priority Engine
I find DemandScience Activate to have less complex programs and better pricing. When a straight-up content syndication program is needed, using DemandScience Activate is quicker to launch and its pricing allows for a greater number of leads to be generated. Overall a much easier process and more flexible options to launch multi-quarter programs.
Do you think DemandScience delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with DemandScience's feature set?
Yes
Did DemandScience live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of DemandScience go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy DemandScience again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation