Maze User Testing is pretty good!
July 08, 2022

Maze User Testing is pretty good!

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Maze User Testing

We use Maze User Testing for unmoderated UserTesting with Figma files. We particularly use large numbers of users to engage and record quant data. The reporting format of Maze User Testing particularly is very beautiful to look at and easy to showcase as well as share with design stakeholders. We’ve recently tried out the card sorting feature as well which had worked well for us.

Pros

  • Unmoderated testing
  • Easy test creation
  • Reporting

Cons

  • Collaboration with Figma
  • Accomodating large Figma prototypes
  • AB testing
  • Quick test building
  • Blocks to build the test are intuitive
  • Card sorting feature has been great
  • Easy to run quant test
  • Easy to test with large number of people on production
  • Easy to run unmoderated competitor studies
Maze User Testing is brilliant to test with a large volume of people and if you’re not after particular qualitative insights, like UserTesting would offer. The card sorting feature is basic and not as mature as Optimal Workshop would offer but it does the job and can be used in many creative ways than just too typically card sort.

Do you think Maze delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Maze's feature set?

Yes

Did Maze live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Maze go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Maze again?

Yes

We’ve struggled with using Maze User Testing with large detailed prototypes with many links, it would usually break, which meant that we either asked for extra support from our Maze User Testing partners or change the test to break it down into smaller tests. That has been a struggle. Apart from that, it’s been great

Comments

More Reviews of Maze

  1. Home
  2. Usability Testing Tools
  3. Maze Reviews
  4. User Review of Maze