Intuitive Fundamentals Easy Sharing
March 16, 2026

Intuitive Fundamentals Easy Sharing

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

We use it to map out business use cases and talk about user flows. It was especially helpful in creating a cross-functional board for event storming, so that we could apply Domain-Driven Design. The problem it solves is having a single source of truth, and a unified view across many different stakeholder teams.

Pros

  • large open interface for adding a lot of ideas from many different users at the same time
  • pretty performant - rapid updates during the session without glitches
  • intuitive artifacts for sharing info - stickies are easy to create, arrange, group, connect, and label
  • sharing is easy, everyone with provisioned accounts can easily access a board through shared link

Cons

  • sometimes zooming and navigating around a large board is a little funky
  • cost, it because too expensive for our organization to use frequently and among all teams
  • easy integrations; rather than having a link in a jira ticket, being able to show a preview of the borad would have been great
  • We don't do a good job as a company measuring this
  • Our software and tools are constantly changing, but to me Miro is a strong choice that I would always recommend.
  • Our software and tools are constantly changing, but to me Miro is a strong choice that I would always recommend.
As mentioned in previous feedback sections, it is intuitive related to an in-person whiteboard experience. The UI is also responsive in the browser, links are easy to share across teams, and we can organize ideas better than with text docs, wiki pages, or ticketing systems. Zooming is also better than competitive products from Confluence, their zoom +/- feature is a disaster and sharing on a call quickly goes off the rails. Miro gives me more confidence if I am sharing my screen and moving around a board, my audience will be able to follow ideas rather than being distracted by glitchy UI.
Ability to tag/comment and get feedback asynchronously. We are a remote first company with many people in different timezones. So we need idea share that persists, and lets people work when they have availability to problem solve a specific topic. Miro boards enable that quite well.
Somewhat. We use Atlassian/Jira/Confluence as well, but the Confluence whiteboards are not as good. Generally we would design in Miro, and save the link in the Jira ticket for reference. Because of vendor consolidation, we try to leverage Confluence whiteboards more often now, but personally I find them clunky and difficult to find which whiteboard I was using for which topic.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

I find it intuitive and easy to use; many whiteboards overload with templates, instructions, and unnecessary items that I have to remove first. But Miro starts with a clean slate when I need it to, which feels more like a true whiteboard experience. It also responds relatively well to navigation around an open board; snappy UI performance is a must.

Comments

More Reviews of Miro

  1. Home
  2. Visual Collaboration Software
  3. Miro Reviews
  4. User Review of Miro