Miro

It's annoying that we have to switch betting teams and miro in meetings

Some things require googling, but overall usability is fine. I suspect there are a lot of useful to0ls I never use, because I haven't discovered them yet.
When I returned after a year of leave, I needed some time to get to used to Miro again, because some basic navigation functionality has changed.

It's pretty easy to use. My gripes are with some small idiosyncrasies with selection behavior with objects and editing text. When I move an object, it automatically de-selects it when I am not done with it. I have to click to select again. Text control is challenging and could be improved. It could use a little more styling capability. It's also weird that it behaves differently in a shape then when using the text tool.

Easy to Integrate, Appearance is great and great medium to collaborate with the team.

Fairly easy to start using Miro.com, especially with the academy of training and templates (either blank or filled in).

It's very intuitive. You have to know a few tricks like locking bits and pieces especially when collborating in workshops but love the flexibility it has

Can't be used without training. Not intuitive.

Miro's usability is really great, but sometimes when dragging notes or other features, they get dropped unexpectedly or it moves it too quick.

Es simple de usar pero se podrían mejorar las etiquetas para mayor accesibilidad, sobre todo para los iconos.

Miro is actually providing dynamic, clear and reliable real-time boards. We always prefer working and collaborating on it as we feel it a trustworthy and easy-to-use collaborative platform with zero frustration. The tool helps us also in daily team communication.

Use of symbols in the UI may not reflect the intended action and requires users to hover to see a tooltip to determine the exact action. If users only use Miro periodically, this means they have to repeat this action each time when creating a board. It would be better to allow users to choose between seeing symbols, text, or a combination of both - especially for accessibility.

Sometimes people get confuse about moving objects, but it's a great tool.

In general, for people that have previous use with different digital apps or software it is easy. But for those that don't or that have access to phone or tablet only it is not.

Sometimes a bit laggy when scrolling through bigger boards, but it works great when presenting and it's easy for everybody to participate.

In general it is very usable but some features I find confusing. There is, for example, a wide range of text box options which all have different features.

Miro provides an easy UI (user interface) for novice and new users. The dashboard system that Miro has is straight forward along with the pre-filled templates that come with the software. Miro also makes it easy to be used with in a team collaboration setting along with any other use that is required for the team. Miro is constantly providing new templates while also adding privacy which is based on your membership.

Miro is easy to use but sometimes the objects move even if you do not want them to.
This is inspite of using the lock feature. Also pictures cannot be pasted on it

The interface toolbars and buttons need to be a little more intuitive. People are used to Microsoft Office products, so unfortunately you may need to follow their lead. For example, Esri changed their GIS products to use Office ribbon menus, and that's made ArcGIS Pro more intuitive.

It is super accessible and easy to use. For desginers that are used to modelling and designing software such as myself, it is a dream, although of course it doesn't offer all the designing features. The good thing is that simultaneously it can be used from other professionals very easily, like for example I had the opportunity to work with students from sociology, which didn't have any problems in using the basic tools. Since it has icons for the tools, it is also easy for people who don't know the language or terms very well, so it can be implemented in participatory research too.

A bit to overloaded. Some colleagues have a problem finding the functions they need.

Super easy, everything is simply explained through the right symbols and icons.

Once you go through a few trainings and learn your way around, the tool is dead simple to use. Until then, it's easy to get lost or do things inefficiently.

it UX is great

Easy to use if you are already familiar with other common software (eg powerpoint, word)

Very practical and easy to use.