Miro Reviews

Use of symbols in the UI may not reflect the intended action and requires users to hover to see a tooltip to determine the exact action. If users only use Miro periodically, this means they have to repeat this action each time when creating a board. It would be better to allow users to choose between seeing symbols, text, or a combination of both - especially for accessibility.

I think it is really intuitive. I was a new user not familiar with this type of software and everything was accessible and where I would expect it to be.

This solution is meeting a very specific need I had and I am very pleased. If we had not found Miro, I would have to rethink some of the programs that were put on pause because of Covid. I am very glad that I can proceed with employee development workshops using this tool.

As mentioned, it's so intuitive that I started using it immediately without having to read a manual, watch a tutorial or go on a forum. It felt like it melded with my mind very quickly. Any time I asked myself a "what if I...?" or "can I do...?", the answer was pretty much always yes! For example, I love that it will align a bunch of shapes so they're equidistant or centred. I love symmetry and I've realised it's very important to me when creating things. The aesthetic is just as important as the content, especially when I'm sharing it with my bosses. They like to see a more sophisticated presentation of ideas and Miro lets me do that. The only reason I didn't give it a 10 is because there are some minor things that could (and I'm sure will) be improved.

It's intuitive for the most part but some elements are a little clunky to work with. Particularly, resizing text, aligning boxes, and spacing things out evenly can be challenging without alignment and measurement functionalities. The tool is probably designed for more scrappy, rapid mapping rather than polished, final deliverables, so the usability for that use case is pretty good.