Useful but costly network monitoring tool
August 19, 2019
Useful but costly network monitoring tool
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
It is used globally at over a thousand locations for network traffic analysis, including NetFlow for every site and datacenter packet capturing. The analysis includes bandwidth capacity management, Top Talkers/Top application analysis, VoIP call analysis, and SharePoint traffic. It is used by the Telecom department and recently started to be leveraged by the applications departments. We are also leveraging the service desk to use it for initial incident triage.
- Good NetFlow collection and analysis.
- Complete suite of network and application analysis features in one tool.
- Integration of network and application metrics for comprehensive performance analysis.
- The interface is very cumbersome and not intuitive.
- Lack of a strong and understandable API for integration with other tools.
- High cost.
- Positive: Improved incident MTTR (Mean Time To Resolve), reducing business downtime.
- Positive: Proactive bandwidth capacity management improving financial visibility and business productivity.
- Negative: High maintenance required for large organizations with very dynamic changes.
SolarWinds provides better modularity, improving your ROI by paying only for what you need as opposed to paying for the entire suite whether you need it or not. It also seems to be much more intuitive. However, I'm not sure that it provides packet capturing functionality for security and advanced troubleshooting purposes.
ExtraHop was evaluated but I'm not sure that it was any simpler to use than NetScout. However, it seems to have a more robust API that we could totally use.
ExtraHop was evaluated but I'm not sure that it was any simpler to use than NetScout. However, it seems to have a more robust API that we could totally use.