my experience with a new unified tool
Updated December 13, 2021
my experience with a new unified tool
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact)
NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact) is being used throughout the organization as the telephone service, snack breaks, monitoring calls, and work schedules. We started using it about 1 month ago. NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact) replaced other tools we used, such as aspect softphone, verisys, and Avaya.
- The tool is extremely dynamic as it replaced more than 5 tools
- The tool is extremely fast, never crashed or lost connection
- The tool is extremely simple to use, not requiring more complex training outside my desk
- The tool could improve the layout by putting more color options
- The tool could decrease its size to let it take up less space on the computer screen
- In the case of my company, NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact) replaced more than 5 different tools (Avaya, verisys, aspect, and others) so you hear a decrease in expenses.
- In addition to investing in a unified tool is the best for employees, as it now uses only one access (user) to carry out various activities.
I'm not as knowledgeable about reporting, only my superiors, but they reported that it's simple to extract team results and unify them.
Yes - Because we have to use more than one tool at the same time and have multiple accesses, now we only use one and only one access.
Do you think NICE CXone delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with NICE CXone's feature set?
Yes
Did NICE CXone live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of NICE CXone go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy NICE CXone again?
Yes
NICE CXone Feature Ratings
Evaluating NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact) and Competitors
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Prior Experience with the Product
I've used several tools, but none were unified and easy like NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact).
I would explore more of the tool to be able to evaluate it with more criteria and knowledge about it.