My Nutanix AOS Review: A year in the life of and Systems Administrator who gets to rest peacefully!
Updated July 07, 2020
My Nutanix AOS Review: A year in the life of and Systems Administrator who gets to rest peacefully!
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Nutanix AOS
Our IT team uses AOS across the majority of our organization's infrastructure. It has provided our IT team agility, ease of implementation and maintenance, flexibility and scalability far better than traditional infrastructure provides us.
- Ability
- Scalability
- One-click-upgrades!
- LCM compatibility with OEM hardware. I realize Nutanix is at the mercy of the vendor in this case.
- Reduced man-hours for initial implementations.
- Reduced man-hours for maintenance.
- Reduced man-hours for infrastructure change/restructures.
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Prior Experience with the Product
- Existing Relationship with the Vendor
we continue to expand our nutanix AOS footprint due to our proven track record with the product and the people of nutanix
Our overall experience learning how to use Nutanix AOS has been quite good; the product overall is pretty intuitive to learn and use. I would not say that training is necessary to use the product but we did receive vendor training and it was very helpful to understand all the capabilities and features available to us to utilize the product.
Other HCI products used or evaluated have been Acuity, HC3, Hyperflex, Maxta, Overt, Proxmox, Simplivity, Symphony, VXRack. Nutanix was really first to market and has had many first features available in their product, familiarity with the product, and our organization's track record with Nutanix's stellar support keeps us going down the HCI path with Nutanix. If it were up to only my decision we would only move away from Nutanix and to a completely open-source Ovirt or Proxmox if our organization architects and administrators would be willing to go self-support only.
Evaluating Nutanix AOS and Competitors
Yes - IBM Blade Center, IBM eServers, IBM Flex Chassis, IBM SVC, IBM XIV, NetApp, lenovo servers
I was not involved in the initial evaluation process for the migration from traditional hardware to hyperconverged platform but I feel that I would still have chosen the nutanix solution, it has served us well to date. If I had been involved in the initial evaluation I would have recommended we move to Acropolis hypervisor with the initial migration instead of holding off.