Unlimited innovation and integrations
Overall Satisfaction with OnBase by Hyland
We are currently using OnBase across our entire organization. We have implemented it in new business, claims, marketing, accounting, and development. We are using it to tackle all of our business process automations. We have automated processes like claim payments, billing statement review, lead management, and even subscription renewals. Since we went live with OnBase (2017), we have not had to hire in our Operations department despite doubling in production over the same time period.
Pros
- Integrations
- Low-code configuration
- API
Cons
- Upgrades
- Test Environment
- Server Infrastructure
- Mobile
- Saved over 25,000 hours in processes since going live in 2017.
- Replaced LOB applications that we were paying subscriptions on.
- Consolidated processes into a single internal platform.
- Perceptive Content (formerly ImageNow)
Perceptive Content (Used)
We switched off of Perceptive Content because their support was absolutely horrendous and the company just completely stopped innovating. Their platform didn't provide the ability to integrate like OnBase does today. There are no limits to what we can achieve within OnBase. whereas we were very limited in what could be automated within Perceptive.
DocFinity (Evaluated)
We evaluated DocFinity at the same time as OnBase. They had similar capabilities in terms of integrations but severely lacked the infrastructure and team to implement it well. We were overwhelmed with their lack of knowledge around their system and their inability to listen to their customers.
Do you think OnBase delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with OnBase's feature set?
Yes
Did OnBase live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of OnBase go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy OnBase again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation