OnBase

User-Friendly Interface: Users have consistently praised the user interface of OnBase, with many stating that it is easy to navigate and intuitive. Numerous reviewers appreciated the clear and organized layout of documents, making it effortless to review and access necessary information.

Easy Workflow and Configuration: Many users found the Workflow and Configuration feature of OnBase easy to learn and use. They highlighted the ability to build complex workflows without excessive custom code, allowing for rapid application development and streamlined business processes.

Effective Customer Support: The customer support provided by Hyland Account Managers and staff has been highly regarded by users. Reviewers mentioned that they found them knowledgeable and helpful in resolving any issues with the application. The effectiveness of the support channels offered by Hyland was also praised in addressing user concerns.

Difficult User Interface: Users have found the user interface of OnBase to be confusing and cluttered, with irrelevant features and icons. Several reviewers have mentioned that this has made tasks difficult to perform and has reduced the available space for important documents. The overwhelming nature of the interface, especially for users transitioning from older systems, has been a common complaint. Some users have also noted that the navigation and visual clutter within each pane of the interface are high.

Performance Issues: Many users have experienced issues with the performance of OnBase. They have reported slow loading of images or certain formats, occasional crashes, and freezing when there is a high volume of documents in the system. Additionally, some users have found the software to be slow over VPN connections. The interconnectivity between in-house applications has also proven to be problematic for several customers.

Lack of User-Friendliness: Users have expressed frustration with the lack of user-friendliness and intuitiveness of OnBase. They have encountered difficulties in understanding search parameters and recommended expensive on-site classes for effective implementation. Some reviewers have criticized the software for lacking a modern UI and refinement in its newest releases. The overall learning curve has been steep for many users who find it challenging to navigate through various modules and manage multiple licenses efficiently.

Based on user reviews, here are the three most common recommendations for OnBase:

1. Ensure smooth data transfer: Users recommend ensuring that current documents can be easily transferred over with the same labels and categorization. This is important to maintain organization and prevent any loss or confusion during the transition process.

2. Provide comprehensive training: It is highly recommended that all individuals who will need to use OnBase receive proper training to maximize efficiency and avoid initial difficulties in learning the system. Investing in training team personnel and having certified administrators and workflow developers are also suggested for optimal use of OnBase.

3. Improve user interface and experience: While OnBase is praised for its features and capabilities, users commonly express the need for improvement in the user interface and overall user experience. Enhancing these aspects would make the system more intuitive and user-friendly, resulting in better adoption and satisfaction among users.

It's important to note that while OnBase receives praise for its document management capabilities and eliminating paper files, some users caution against relying on it as a primary system for handling documentation due to reliability issues under heavy loads. Additionally, speed is mentioned as a concern by some users, suggesting that those with speed as a major requirement should explore other options.