Pure Best Storage FlashBlade
August 26, 2021
Pure Best Storage FlashBlade
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Pure Storage FlashBlade
Pure Storage Flash Blade was used by my client to hold site wide backups for high value targets. It was used to replace tape storage. Overall, this was a fantastic choice. Tapes were slow and unwieldy. The UI is a little funky, and if you are coming from an environment where NetApp, or another vendor's units were in place, you'll miss some features that FlashBlade doesn't provide at this time. It [is] also serving the business by enabling the running of critical workloads that demand high IOPs throughput and are latency sensitive. The solution also easily scales to meet business demands.
Pros
- High performance.
- Easy to manage.
- Quick restores.
- Quickly backup.
- Replication.
- Kubernetes support.
- Good support.
- Easy to use interface.
Cons
- Pricing.
- Performance.
- No data replication.
- Please increase analytics and reporting information.
- The price point and compact footprint worked well for a NAS unit in a co-location data center.
- Azure NetApp Files and NetApp Cloud Manager (formerly OnCommand Cloud Manager)
The NetApp All Flash FAS provided similar performance but had a larger footprint.
Do you think Pure Storage FlashBlade delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Pure Storage FlashBlade's feature set?
Yes
Did Pure Storage FlashBlade live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Pure Storage FlashBlade go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Pure Storage FlashBlade again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation