Time saving and fun program to use!
Overall Satisfaction with Seismic
We currently use Seismic as a content library, in addition to use all of its livedoc and automation properties to update materials on a quarterly basis. We use a wide variety of Seismic's functionalities to improve and optimize our quarterly update process. It has helped our team out a lot by replacing the master slide feature we previously hads in InDesign. I also really love that our end users have the ability to add minor customizations when they download pitchbooks; it has saved our marketing team a lot of time on top of our compliance team because fewer books need to be created and thus reviewed. The biggest issue I have right now with Seismic is the delay in generating pitch books and pushing updates on reference slides.
Pros
- Automation
- Shared slide model is a time saver
- Customization for end users - specifically content selector (it's my favorite)
Cons
- I wish Seismic had spell check on the website (content manager)
- I wish we could push updates on reference slides
- It can be very slow when generating a PDF
- Programming can take some time but is well worth it in the end
- Waiting for materials to load and generate can be very slow
- Minimizes errors when we are able to load in data for automation
Do you think Seismic delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Seismic's feature set?
Yes
Did Seismic live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Seismic go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Seismic again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation