Overall Satisfaction with Symantec Client Management Suite
We use Symantec Client Management Suite across the whole environment. We use it to manage all our workstations and several of our servers. Specifically, we use it for patching, software deployment, blacklisting applications, and asset inventory. We particularly like the direction that Symantec has gone with software deployment. Symantec allows the use of Peer to Peer software deployment which limits the need for distribution servers in the network. We've been using it quite successfully with some of our smaller locations.
- Patch management.
- Software deployment.
- Licensing is a pain.
- Application metering while works can bog down a computer if not careful.
- Reduction in infrastructure with new peer-to-peer functionality.
- Reporting on assets in environment is really good.
- KACE Asset Management Appliance, KACE Systems Deployment Appliance (SDA) and Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM)
Kace is very fast to set-up and it's good for a lot of companies if patch and software deployment is all you care about but I don't think that it is as strong as SCCM or Symantec CMS. SCCM is a strong competitor to Symantec Client Management Suite and they both share a lot of the same functionality. Our company uses SCCM on servers and Symantec Client Management Suite on workstations. Symantec has a lot of products that interconnect rather easily like Change Management, Service Desk, and SEP.
Do you think Symantec Client Management Suite delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Symantec Client Management Suite's feature set?
Yes
Did Symantec Client Management Suite live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Symantec Client Management Suite go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Symantec Client Management Suite again?
Yes