TestComplete Functional Testing
Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete
We have been using TestComplete for over 3 years. The tools we purchased are for the WEB module and planning to purchase the Desktop later. I am using the test complete for my Functional and Smoke Testing as I created lots of test scenarios and worked as per requirements. The challenge I have is when the test fails because of the Name Mapping. The name mapping on each object changes a lot and makes my job a little complicated. Intelligent Quality is another extension, that helps with the name mapping issues, and We are planning to purchase.
Pros
- Smoketest
- Functional testing
- Testsuite executions
Cons
- Name Mapping
- Progress Telerik UI and Micro Focus UFT One (formerly HP UFT)
Very close evaluations on all tools
Do you think TestComplete delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with TestComplete's feature set?
Yes
Did TestComplete live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of TestComplete go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy TestComplete again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation