Acumatica vs. Finmark from BILL
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Acumatica | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Acumatica delivers a set of cloud-based business software applications with dashboards, reporting tools, integrated document management, centralized security, and customization tools. | $1,000 per year |
Finmark from BILL | N/A | N/A | Finmark, now from BILL (acquired November 2022), provides financial planning and modeling software for startups. Finmark’s platform aims to take complex financial concepts and calculations and distill them down into a simple to use interface so companies can update, inspect, and share their financial metrics. Companies, from pre-revenue to pre-IPO, can use on Finmark to align teams, drive collaboration, reduce costs and resources. | $50 per month |
| Acumatica | Finmark from BILL | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pricing is always consumption-based with no five-year lock-ins or termination penalties. The Acumatica ERP pricing structure allows adding casual users, suppliers, and customers without paying for additional licenses. The cost is based on the features and resources utilized, not on the number of users who access the system. An Acumatica partner works with users to understand specific requirements, determine the proper resources and modules for the company, and presents a price for the license. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Acumatica | Finmark from BILL | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 991 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
99% Delivers good value for the price 886 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 978 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 619 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
69% Implementation went as expected 549 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Acumatica | Finmark from BILL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Customization |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reporting & Analytics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| General Ledger and Configurable Accounting |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Order Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subledger and Financial Process |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Financial Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Execution Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grants Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Procurement |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Risk Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Logistics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturing |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supply Chain |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Product Lifecycle Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acumatica | Finmark from BILL | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Zoho One Score9.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Zoho One Score9.2 out of 10 | Oracle Hyperion (legacy) Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) Score4.8 out of 10 | Oracle Hyperion (legacy) Score7.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Acumatica | Finmark from BILL | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.5 | - |
| Usability | 8.2 | - |
| Availability | 8.7 | - |
| Performance | 7.4 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.7 | - |
| In-Person Training | 7.0 | - |
| Online Training | 7.8 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 7.0 | - |
| Configurability | 7.5 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 8.5 | - |
| Ease of integration | 7.8 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.0 | - |
| Professional Services | 8.4 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 6.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 7.1 | - |
| Acumatica | Finmark from BILL | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| In-Person Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Online Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Professional Services |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Acumatica Screenshots |










