Acumatica delivers a set of cloud-based business software applications with dashboards, reporting tools, integrated document management, centralized security, and customization tools.
$1,000
per year
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly Dynamics NAV) is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
The technology is based on the Navision product acquired by Microsoft in 2002. This product is the best-selling Microsoft ERP platform, and is often used by companies in the manufacturing and distribution verticals.
$8
per month per user
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
N/A
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Enterprise
Resource Planning is a tool to manage, control and optimize
business processes. It helps in streamlining all the operations under one roof
and helps in improving the overall productivity of the business. With TYASuite
Cloud ERP Software, users can launch campaigns, enhance workflows and lead
teams on one page. It is a package in itself and can integrate with all the
processes involved in the business.
N/A
Pricing
Acumatica
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Dynamics 365 Business Central Team Members
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Essentials
$70
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Premium
$100
per month (billed annually) per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Acumatica
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Free Trial
No
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
Pricing is always consumption-based with no five-year lock-ins or termination penalties.
The Acumatica ERP pricing structure allows adding casual users, suppliers, and customers without paying for additional licenses.
The cost is based on the features and resources utilized, not on the number of users who access the system. An Acumatica partner works with users to understand specific requirements, determine the proper resources and modules for the company, and presents a price for the license.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Acumatica
We used Business Central for 8 years and after 8 months of implementing Acumatica our processes are more efficient and our reporting is miles ahead of where we were with Business Central, and at a fraction of the cost. Acumatica's cloud first approach and customizability puts …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Controller in Finance and Accounting at Northern Plains Rail Services (Accounting, 201-500 employees)
Chose Acumatica
I’m really happy we went with Acumatica over Microsoft. To me, they are more innovative and pushing out changes all the time which is important to me. There are some serious settings that need to change that I wish it would adopt from Microsoft like the user security which is …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose Acumatica
I have preferred the flexibility within Acumatica quite a bit more but I do prefer the others data analysis better
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Acumatica
The ease of customization and the network of integrate-able ISV’s really stood out to us over the competitive products.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose Acumatica
Dynamics SL is our current platform that we are migrating away from due to the lack of new features and future support. We attempted to launch with Dynamics 365 but found many screens and work flows do not work as intended. We left those project deployments and went with …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose Acumatica
Transaction based pricing is better suited for us, the ability to not have to rely on so many customisations or addons
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.5
169 Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
6.6
11 Ratings
13% below category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.6150 Ratings
6.211 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.4118 Ratings
6.39 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.7145 Ratings
6.610 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.3
498 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.0
25 Ratings
6% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.3469 Ratings
8.124 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.4422 Ratings
7.922 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.2
611 Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.4
29 Ratings
0% below category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.6505 Ratings
8.525 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.9601 Ratings
8.428 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
7.5
630 Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.4
30 Ratings
11% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Dashboards
7.7598 Ratings
8.326 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.1618 Ratings
8.430 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.7606 Ratings
8.629 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.7
910 Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.4
30 Ratings
9% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
8.5877 Ratings
8.429 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
8.4764 Ratings
8.328 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
7.8349 Ratings
8.417 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.3498 Ratings
8.416 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.3722 Ratings
8.919 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.2571 Ratings
7.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.3620 Ratings
8.720 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.2
607 Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.6
26 Ratings
7% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
8.0593 Ratings
8.526 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.3309 Ratings
7.618 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
7.8423 Ratings
8.222 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.5
617 Ratings
7% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.0
28 Ratings
1% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Pricing
7.9524 Ratings
8.225 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.3555 Ratings
8.925 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.8375 Ratings
7.417 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.9515 Ratings
8.422 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.6307 Ratings
8.313 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.6
722 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.2
20 Ratings
8% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.2531 Ratings
8.518 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.0649 Ratings
8.619 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.2382 Ratings
7.614 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.7396 Ratings
8.216 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.4574 Ratings
8.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
9.9
4 Ratings
27% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
8 Ratings
14% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.64 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.93 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
9.93 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
10.02 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.02 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
9.93 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
7.6
275 Ratings
7% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.6
11 Ratings
7% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.4248 Ratings
7.510 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.3245 Ratings
7.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.0218 Ratings
7.19 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
6.8152 Ratings
6.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
7.9
114 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.9
8 Ratings
17% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
7.7114 Ratings
6.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
7.3
355 Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.9
16 Ratings
11% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
7.4152 Ratings
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
7.1122 Ratings
7.210 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
7.8290 Ratings
8.114 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
7.8231 Ratings
7.613 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
7.510 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
7.6
176 Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.3
12 Ratings
21% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
7.6130 Ratings
7.211 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
7.7156 Ratings
7.411 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
7.8138 Ratings
6.711 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.5142 Ratings
7.511 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.7115 Ratings
7.69 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.5
217 Ratings
19% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
10 Ratings
9% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.0158 Ratings
7.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.3149 Ratings
7.48 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.0123 Ratings
7.98 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.7175 Ratings
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
7.1167 Ratings
9.17 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.7
237 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.0
10 Ratings
7% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
7.6196 Ratings
9.17 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
7.9221 Ratings
8.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.6192 Ratings
7.17 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
7.6186 Ratings
9.17 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
8.1208 Ratings
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
Feature
Acumatica
8.1
282 Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.4
12 Ratings
1% above category average
TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Forecasting
7.4232 Ratings
6.512 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
7.6268 Ratings
7.212 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
7.5228 Ratings
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Acumatica and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and TYASuite Plug and Play Cloud ERP
I think it’s a great product. I think it’s very customizable, which is a big plus. For manufacturing, it’s excellent because of creating the inventory, turning it into an actual product to sell, and also tracking the status of each process within that system. I can’t think of any areas where it’s not suited, because otherwise we would be looking for something else or making changes, and at this time, we’re just growing with the system.
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is well suited for inventory management in all aspects. Its accessibility, along with my other apps, when out of the office is unparalleled. I find it easy to work with on a desktop or laptop; however, it could use some work on a mobile device.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Particularly well is just the ease of it being able to be used. We're coming from Sage, that's the product that we used before. Sage was limited, five people could get into the system at a time. Acumatica is unlimited.
The amount of information that's so easily accessible has made us more efficient, more productive, and it just makes for an easier workday when everybody can see the same information real time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Automate the creation of bills of materials for production. We can now generate a BoM from a sales order.
Organization of all data pertaining to thousands of parts, assemblies, and finished goods. Engineering and purchasing have a common portal.
We can create sales orders from quotations instead of re-entering them (this did require some bolt-on software). Less redundant work with fewer entry errors.
Accounting can provide reports based on specific criteria stored in NAV. We can pull better and more detailed intelligence.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Acumatica's open API is very powerful but doesn't get integrated cleanly across every external system, challenge arises with integration of legacy systems
Some of the platform feature's requires third-party add-ons or custom developments like advance finance report & BI.
Sometimes it gets glitch in the system leading slower processing speed
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We are highly likely to renew because Acumatica has become the foundation of our ERP strategy replacing another ERP system with a more flexible, scalable platform while improving governance, planning, and operational visibility. Ongoing stabilization, roadmap investment in IBP and automation, and strong alignment across Finance and Operations give us long‑term confidence in the platform.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We've already decided to continue using this software. It is too expensive for us to upgrade so we made a workaround by using the virtual computer with Windows XP installed on it. We did research replacing this software, but it was a better financial decision to keep what we had instead
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The processes are very intuitive and easy to use. Whether you are entering AP bills, timecards for payroll, or AR invoices, the processes are similar and easy to use. The drill-down capability is also a huge plus as you can easily toggle between different modules without having to leave the screen you are in and navigating through a menu to get the information you need. We found that the standard reports out of the box are lacking. Our implementation did not go so well and when we were finally ready to run financial reports, it was both disappointing and frustrating to discover that the P&L was highly summarized and to get a detailed report required having to do a lot of formatting myself. I was able to figure it out on my own, but when our financials were already delayed getting published, I did not really have the time to spend trying to figure out how to build my own P&L.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Ever since we deployed it, it has been a one-stop-shop for our organization. Everything we do has been through it, and we do not need to use other vendors to access student records, accounts receivable, procurement records, grades, transcripts, and report cards... they are all in one interface, which has been a solid plus for our organization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would rate the overall support for Acumatica an 8 out of 10. The support team is generally responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful when resolving issues or answering questions. Documentation and community resources are also useful. However, response times can occasionally vary depending on the complexity of the issue or support queue, which slightly affects the overall experience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It provides one to efficiently be able to manage bookkeeping and inventory without much challenges. One can easily navigate through workflow processes while managing usages and budgets. Being able to produce reports in Word, Excel or PDF means one is able to have a working document to produce trends and graphs or produce pivot tables.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I'd say the partner selection is critically important. I think the software is very easy to implement. It's very customizable to your business. Finding a partner that will work with you to understand your business and your needs is the critical piece to make sure that the system goes along with it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Having used Pastel for a long time in the business, it lacked certain features, or the system was not probably setup for our business needs and requirements at the time. It was also not 100% cloud based and needed to be used through remote desktop which had its limitations. Zero just had 10% of what our business needed.
I have personally supported all of the Dynamic family of ERP systems and made the decision to concentrate on NAV as the solution of choice. From a support and development standpoint there are few if any packages that can compare. It is not uncommon for most of the companies that I support to only call me once or twice a month after the first year. This is due to the ease of tracking down problems and errors and the ability for a developer to provide the end-user with routines that automatically correct the most basic kind of error
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
From my understanding, the P.O. module is not very robust, at least the last time I inquired about it. At the time, it had a one-to-one match, with one invoice for one P.O. and that isn't practical for many businesses. I don't believe it would be an easy system to use for sending out invoices, if we had thousands of retail utility customers. We do a small number of invoices because we sell wholesale power, not retail, so we only Invoice the municipality. Not each utility customer.
They are very responsive and knowledgeable about the product. If the rep doesn't have the ability to solve the issue, they quickly get someone else involved to assist us.
We are able to send automated notifications through business Events, which ensures that information travels seamlessly and without the possibility of someone forgetting an email.
We save time being able to read our demand and level it against our current inventory qty on hand and our supply to make better strategic decisions when purchasing.
Better our business and see our pitfalls that were once hidden in our factory by establishing an On-Time Delivery system within a generic inquiry that uses data that is readily available in Acumatica.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info