Adobe Campaign vs. BannerFlow

Adobe Campaign stands out as a powerful solution for efficiently handling multi-channel marketing campaigns, allowing me to connect with my audience through various channels such as email, mobile, social media, and more. Its centralized platform serves as a command centre, empowering to effortlessly design, implement, and track campaigns across diverse channels, ensuring a consistent and precisely targeted messaging approach.

Bannerflow works great for organisations who produce thousands of creatives in different formats every month and run creatives based advertising across multiple online channels- it helps you save redesign time and costs across your team by making the process easy and efficient. It also helps directly run ads and experiments and analyse the results using creative focussed data

Incentivized

• If we already have a list of subscribers to whom we want to send private newsletters about certain updates in our products and services, it is very easy to import them into the platform through text document formats, or directly from cloud platforms that have allowed us to save their information
• It integrates very well with platforms oriented to the development of help desk operations, as in the case of Zendesk, where we store all the information of the customers that communicate with us to improve their user experience through technical assistance, and to have a better feedback with them.
• Adobe Campaign allows us to create our own forms that can be added to the company's page, so that depending on the type of potential customer that is accessing them, we can show personalized information that is of interest to them as customers, and thus ensure more business.

Incentivized

• Designs can be easily copied and adapted to different sizes to save time
• Extensive processes for collaboration and approvals within the tool
• allows you to share direct links to advertiser

Incentivized

• We have had problems with the usability of their platform. When we communicate with the integrated technical support via e-mail, it takes hours to respond.
• On the other hand, the application does not allow us to multitask, your platform becomes very slow.
• Also, it is a bit complicated to adapt to using the application completely.

Incentivized

• It can be a bit slow at times.
• More flexibility in design templates.
• Occasional bugs.

Incentivized

Once you go for Neolane you are a bit stuck with it, so we will most likely stay with Neolane. Cost of investment and training are the main factors at work here. We havesimply have invested too much in the product to stop using it after 2 years. That said, my score of 8 does not imply that the product is worthy of getting an 8 but reflects our willingness to renew. Given that upgrading to a new version will cost again a substantial sum, we most likely will keep using the current version we are on which is 6X.

Thanks to this tool we are taking more internal control of the creation and deployment of campaigns with less dependency on an ESP. We can pre-program marketing publications, being able to concentrate on the target audience. It helps me manage email campaigns with real-time tracking.

Aside from frequent error prompts, the program is quite dependable

Adobe Campaign has supported our marketing campaigns with 100% assurance of positive results. It has the capability to boost company growth within a short period of time as compared to other marketing tools. It has automated marketing campaigns and reached a large group of our targeted customers. The customer support team has been reliable and when we request support they respond quickly.

All these applications are very similar, adobe has a differential for the company's expertise, for the way cloud services and their specialists are treated. I believe that it also has a differential in the metrics and management of flows where it is possible to have a broader view of the entire process. The availability to be able to manage everything on several different channels is also an important point.

BannerFlow is much better than handling everything in-house (i.e. creating advertisements yourself and manually adding them to each social media platform). It doesn't require the same bandwidth and time requirement as creating everything in-house, along with analyzing advertisements. Everything is accessible in one place, the creation, the publishing, the A/B testing, etc. so it is much simpler.

Incentivized

The licensing terms after purchasing this platform are manageable. The set price is relatively low as compared to that of similar products and there is a guarantee in Returns on Investment after the agreed period of time. We are able to manage the billing frequency without any failure due to the stability and positive performance of this platform in marketing campaigns.

• Saved the three business units we have of huge marketing automation platform costs for three years
• Streamlined and centralised our marketing automation operations
• The downside is that due to the varying nature of businesses and sales cycles of the three business units of the enterprise I worked for, it became hard to tweak one platform into 3 varying, different needs and so many different business models and scenarios.

Incentivized

• Saved us many man hours in redesign
• Helped us launch campaigns faster
• Saved us collaboration costs for marketing agencies
• Helped maintain brand guideline consistency

Incentivized