What users are saying about

Adobe Experience Manager

Top Rated
149 Ratings

Evoq Content

24 Ratings

Adobe Experience Manager

Top Rated
149 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8 out of 101

Evoq Content

24 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 6.6 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Adobe Experience Manager

If the employees in charge of creating pages are not developers, this is a great platform since everything is easy and drag and drop style. For a developer, this might be more frustrating since small code tweaks are not as accessible.
Vanessa Suarez profile photo

Evoq Content

Very well suited for any community based DNN site.
Sid Childers profile photo

Feature Rating Comparison

Security

Adobe Experience Manager
8.2
Evoq Content
10.0
Role-based user permissions
Adobe Experience Manager
8.2
Evoq Content
10.0

Platform & Infrastructure

Adobe Experience Manager
7.9
Evoq Content
9.6
API
Adobe Experience Manager
7.8
Evoq Content
10.0
Internationalization / multi-language
Adobe Experience Manager
8.1
Evoq Content
9.1

Web Content Creation

Adobe Experience Manager
7.2
Evoq Content
7.3
WYSIWYG editor
Adobe Experience Manager
8.6
Evoq Content
8.6
Code quality / cleanliness
Adobe Experience Manager
7.1
Evoq Content
9.1
Admin section
Adobe Experience Manager
7.4
Evoq Content
7.7
Page templates
Adobe Experience Manager
6.7
Evoq Content
6.8
Library of website themes
Adobe Experience Manager
5.6
Evoq Content
8.6
Mobile optimization / responsive design
Adobe Experience Manager
7.3
Evoq Content
6.2
Publishing workflow
Adobe Experience Manager
8.0
Evoq Content
5.9
Form generator
Adobe Experience Manager
6.5
Evoq Content
5.7

Web Content Management

Adobe Experience Manager
6.1
Evoq Content
6.7
Content taxonomy
Adobe Experience Manager
6.6
Evoq Content
5.9
SEO support
Adobe Experience Manager
6.4
Evoq Content
7.2
Bulk management
Adobe Experience Manager
6.1
Evoq Content
6.6
Availability / breadth of extensions
Adobe Experience Manager
6.2
Evoq Content
8.2
Community / comment management
Adobe Experience Manager
5.2
Evoq Content
5.4

Pros

  • Easily searchable with the proper meta data
  • Creating links to assets, publishing assets and sharing assets is very easy and fast
  • Uploading files and creating folders is fast and easy
Meghan Hays profile photo
  • DNN is easy to install, configure and administer
  • DNN is a full-scale content management system that offers many options for managing blogs, photo galleries, files and communication
  • DNN is secure and offers flexible role-based security architecture
Boris Skylar profile photo

Cons

  • Adding meta data to batch files would make it much more efficient
  • You still need to convert any Word or Excel docs to PDFs if this was on auto when you have multiple files, it would also save time
Meghan Hays profile photo
  • Skin customization has room to be improved.
  • Mobile friendly platform, e.g.: make use of the Bootstrap as default skin
  • DNN is more into software developer. It will nice to have some tools for web designers.
  • Lacking of complete facilities for disabled people (see WCAG). In this case Sitecore is much more powerful.
Yudhistira Yu profile photo

Likelihood to Renew

Adobe Experience Manager9.0
Based on 5 answers
I'll continue to use this product for many years. Adobe is making it clear they are taking customer feedback seriously and there continues to be growing demand for Adobe CQ implementations. As a developer, I find that there is still lots of room in this platform to try new techniques and really keep our implementations up to par with the latest standards.
Curtis Mortensen profile photo
Evoq Content9.7
Based on 7 answers
DNN seems to have lots of support from their team of founders and its community.The store also lots of solutions.It seems pretty safe to continue using this CMS.
Yudhistira Yu profile photo

Usability

Adobe Experience Manager10.0
Based on 2 answers
I personally feel that AEM is very intuitive to use from an authoring standpoint. The entire CMS was engineered around the author. Everything about AEM is geared to helping authors generate and maintain content. There are ways that tool tips can be customized so that any individual could simply hover over and be guided step by step on how to author web content
Vagner Polund profile photo
Evoq Content9.1
Based on 1 answer
I have not found anything that was as user friendly and easy to use with tons of Community Support as well as Corporate Support like Training Videos, Forums, Blogs, Documentation, Wiki, Free CodePlex downloads, Free Modules and then the DNN Store that has thousands of Skins and Application Modules to accomplish everything you need.
Dennis Ashe profile photo

Support

Adobe Experience Manager9.0
Based on 1 answer
Its so far the best Content Management System, available in market.
No photo available
Evoq Content9.1
Based on 1 answer
I don't see how it could get any better unless they moved their staff into our offices. You have available to you any type of Support you need or want, both paid and free from thousands of developers and consultants all over the world. You might even find some on Mars if you look hard enough.Also, with all of the available resources available from your Browser you can literally find the answer to any question you have in a matter of minutes.
Dennis Ashe profile photo

Implementation

Adobe Experience Manager8.7
Based on 2 answers
Depending on your individual needs, It is really quite simple to create an authoring experience for a website that looks really good. I have been part of many implementations and many teams and have seen many projects that were super successful and others that were not implemented well. AEM has room for a lot of flexibility in the implementation process compared to other CMS like SharePoint
Vagner Polund profile photo
Evoq Content9.1
Based on 1 answer
I would never look back and question our decision to implement DNN not only as the Platform for our own use but also to use it to develop a complete turnkey system for our Clients worldwide. Everything you need is available and there is more expertise around the globe than you could ever imagine
Dennis Ashe profile photo

Alternatives Considered

Have used a handful of other content management systems, all of which tend to be either proprietary or freeware -- and the latter presents a security issue. Adobe Experience Manager is easily the most feature-rich content management system I have used, but more features sometimes comes with inconveniences -- taking longer to load when accessing remotely (times out on slow Internet connections), slower taxonomy tagging, etc. It is also the most well-supported system I have used; Adobe is more responsive than most if glitches happen or in response to changes in Google practices for SEO, etc
Courtney E. Howard profile photo
DNN is more cost effective, and has powerful backing of .NET platform.Very much modular and skinning is relatively easy to do.
Yudhistira Yu profile photo

Return on Investment

  • A few clients see no ROI but few are heavily dependent and align on it.. Mixed reviews from clients
Sujeet Sharma profile photo
  • Faster Web development
  • Less amount spent in maintaining the website unless the site required new modules.
  • Many free and paid modules readily available
No photo available

Pricing Details

Adobe Experience Manager

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Evoq Content

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details