Adobe Experience Manager is a combined web content management system and digital asset management system. The combined applications of Adobe Experience Manager Sites and Adobe Experience Manager Assets is offered by the vendor as an end-to-end solution for managing and delivering marketing content.
N/A
Experro
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Experro is an agentic product discovery and personalization platform built to optimize eCommerce experiences, used by brands to deliver search, discovery, and content that is hyper-personalized for every shopper and automatically optimized to drive key business KPIs. Available for B2C, B2B, and DTC brands, Experro creates intelligent, intent-driven journeys by analyzing real-time shopper behavior and surfacing high-performing products through advanced text and image…
Adobe Experience Manager, built on Java, means that the pool of developers available to work on the platform is large. Adobe Experience Manager's front-ends and client library management tooling mean that front-end developers can feel at home despite a lack of Java knowledge.
We wanted a CMS which is known in market, which have a good ecosystem. With Adobe Experience Manager, we get integration with Target, Tag management, and other Adobe products.
Adobe Experience Manager provides way more. It is a much more holistic tool to help us manage the entire customer Journey. I, however, do not have enough power to make those decisions. I did not in fact choose Adobe Experience Manager, but I do like it better.
Adobe's integration with all of its other products requires digital marketing, making its system stand out from the rest. AI integration takes it to the next level.
I selected Adobe Experience Manager because it was the easiest to connect to our platforms, the best cost for the size of our company, and I was using Adobe for almost everything else at the time. I think this was the best solution for our smaller company at the time.
So we chose Experro over Contentstack and Shogun because it is an all-in-one DXP. It has everything built-in that a business would need to flourish and grow.
Before Experro, we were using a content management system that was slow, high maintenance and limited in features, which not only took a toll on our SEO performance but hindered our overall content management process.
We were looking for something more agile and streamlined …
Firstly the pricing plans have a vast difference. We were amazed at how feather-light Experro was on our pockets. On top of that, the ease of comprehension and use of the platform was higher in Experro as compared to Vue Storefront. Relying on Experro was totally worth the …
We considered Bloomreach, Contentstack, Contentful, and Experro. After comparing the services, integration capabilities, and pricing, we went ahead with Experro. The experience of working with them has been a smooth ride. We are looking forward to more success with Experro …
In my experience, Experro is Highly affordable, no operational overhead, fully-managed so you can focus on your business whereas contentful has a Higher license, development, and maintenance costs.Experro integrates with any eCommerce platform and offers a fully-managed …
In my opinion, setting up Experro is much easier compare to Bloomreach and we also didn't have to integrate with whole lot of tools to get the end results. Also, Experro is DXP with a combination of multiple tools like Headless CMS, Search, Merchandising, etc. giving us all the …
I'll answer the second one because I mean, the first one I don't have an issue with. The second scenario is we oftentimes have the need to spin off very small campaign style sites or sites that generate leads but are unbranded and that sort of thing. So that's hard to do in AEM because you have to then create another organization within AEM to do that. And we're talking about sites that are maybe five to 10 pages in size. So we've been investigating Edge, but then that's a different workflow, so we'd have to train people on that. So it would be nice if there was something within the AEM structure that could allow you to do something very similar to Edge, where you make some small micro sites that are not necessarily branded, that you could still host within the platform and not have to retrain everybody on a completely different platform.
Experro's seamless integration and powerful features have elevated our eCommerce game. We would enthusiastically recommend Experro to any business seeking a complete solution for creating stunning and high-performing online stores. Its user-friendly nature and compatibility with BigCommerce make it an ideal choice for those aiming to surpass customer expectations.
It allows us to scale so that we can make a change on a global footer. And it applies to all of the different property websites. It allows us to set up components and compartmentalize things in a way. The big thing is that it's scalable. And then it also ties into Adobe Analytics and other Adobe products. So we are a complete Adobe shop. Every Adobe product that we can use, we use. I don't think we do it for marketing so much, but for doing target testing and analytics, data scientists are using the same product and so it all speaks.
Experro's Headless Store Frontend integrated with our existing backend on Shopify, creating rich, lightning-fast, headless content and commerce experiences without requiring us to overhaul our system.
It bundled all the necessary components for headless eCommerce implementation, eliminating the need for separate hosting, CDN, or CMS.
Experro offered revenue-generating search experiences for each customer, significantly increasing our conversions.
There are some glitches in permissions inheritance that require us to toggle a save on permissions in groups that inherit from a group that was recently updated.
Large packages require stopping the workflow launcher OSGi components or many workflows will slow down the server.
Locked pages are hard to find unless I use /siteadmin... I often hear that the CQ tools will go away, but if we lose that, some small things might be harder to do, like finding locked pages.
We had and still have a fantastic experience using Adobe CQ. Lots of flexibility, great integration with other Adobe products we already use and a powerful technology make it a great fit for our corporate environment. Also as the community grows, it makes it easier to network with other developers and users to get new ideas on how to continue to get the best out of the software.
Considering I'm completely self-taught on Adobe Experience Manager, I have to rate usability quite high since plenty of aspects were easy to figure out on my own. With its cloud-based platform, access from anywhere it super great for overall usability. Edits can also be made pretty quick and easy, which is another great feature.
The ease of use is top-notch! Honestly, the platform is intuitive. Whether it i uploading new content or managing the digital assets of a landing page - we got the hang of it pretty quickly.
Being part of Adobe Suite means you are already notified when the tool has any outages. However, I have never faced unplanned outages. Whenever you face any issue with the site, it is clearly stated if there were any planned outages and how quickly you will be back to normal. So, I will say that even the outages are planned and managed in a great way like their other services.
With respect to performance, Adobe experience manager is one of the best in the CMS space. We didn't observe frequent slowness on platform, however the systems which are accessing experience manager should be of good specifications without which slowness would be observed. Adobe experience manager works well in integration with other solutions, unless the destination application is designed to trigger frequent calls to AEM.
Adobe Experience Manager, in all its capacity, is a great alternative to any other CMS you are using. It helps in rapid development and makes life easier for maintaining the website for multi-language sites. Technical know-how is eliminated at content authoring. Better documentation in terms of live examples with videos would be appreciated.
We had contacted the support team to solve our doubts about the theme integration. The team was quick. Apparently they are available 24x5, it is pretty much enough to cover all our needs in the real-time.
Depending on your individual needs, It is really quite simple to create an authoring experience for a website that looks really good. I have been part of many implementations and many teams and have seen many projects that were super successful and others that were not implemented well. AEM has room for a lot of flexibility in the implementation process compared to other CMS like SharePoint
SSO is one fits all, so we don't have to have a separate SSO for each application of Adobe The integration with Analytics works perfectly and bring directly value really quickly Target remains more complicated to set up, but can also bring a lot of value once integrated with the rest of the Adobe platform The fact that the solution is Cloud services is also a big advantage for maintenance
In my experience, Experro is Highly affordable, no operational overhead, fully-managed so you can focus on your business whereas Contentful has a Higher license, development, and maintenance costs.Experro integrates with any eCommerce platform and offers a fully-managed frontend out-of-the-box while there is a need to hire developers to stitch Contentstack, eCommerce APIs, and third-party apps into a “custom” build frontend.
Switching to Experro has saved a lot of our developers' time, getting them to focus on other pertinent tasks instead of making daily updates on the website
