Adobe Learning Manager vs. Quantive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe Learning Manager
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Adobe Learning Manager is a Learning Management System developed by Adobe Inc. that offers personalized learning at scale to employees, partners and customers alike. Compliant with GDPR guidelines, SOC2 TYPE 2 and FedRAMP Certifications, Adobe Learning Manager integrates with Adobe Experience Manager Sites, Adobe Commerce, Marketo Engage with out-of-the-box components and any other application through Open APIs, offering hybrid learning programs and detailed analytics.…N/A
Quantive
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Quantive helps organizations to achieve their strategic potential. Quantive’s Strategy Execution Platform is based on the OKR management methodology. By embedding strategic context, priorities, and progress into the day-to-day, Quantive aims to help users to create organizations that excel at execution, boasting users among 2,000 global customers across enterprises, not-for-profits, startups, and governments, helping them to accelerate growth and transformational change by creating better…
$0
per month per user
Pricing
Adobe Learning ManagerQuantive
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$0
per month per user
Scale
$9
per month per user
Enterprise
Upon request
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Learning ManagerQuantive
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsEnterprise pricing is available upon request.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Learning ManagerQuantive
Features
Adobe Learning ManagerQuantive
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Learning Manager
7.6
144 Ratings
7% below category average
Quantive
-
Ratings
Course authoring8.1126 Ratings00 Ratings
Course catalog or library8.0139 Ratings00 Ratings
Player/Portal7.8134 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning content7.0127 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile friendly6.8117 Ratings00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications6.0135 Ratings00 Ratings
Assignments7.8125 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance management8.0107 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning administration7.0132 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics7.0133 Ratings00 Ratings
Social learning8.0114 Ratings00 Ratings
Gamification8.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign On (SSO) Enabled Learning9.029 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adobe Learning ManagerQuantive
Small Businesses
iSpring LMS
iSpring LMS
Score 9.5 out of 10
Coda by Grammarly
Coda by Grammarly
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
iSpring LMS
iSpring LMS
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM Targetprocess
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Axonify
Axonify
Score 10.0 out of 10
IBM Targetprocess
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adobe Learning ManagerQuantive
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(149 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(12 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(45 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.4
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(30 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.7
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe Learning ManagerQuantive
Likelihood to Recommend
Adobe
It's good if you have a good use case for that feed. I do know that you have to incorporate it in a process in isolation. It's not you don't realize the full value, so you have to incorporate it into an overall improvement process. I would say the pro cases are marketing optimization with respect to campaigns. And I would say that the areas it's not well suited is in distilling attribution. So if you were to take all of the improvements that it suggested, the numbers exceed revenue, which isn't real, but that's a hard problem to solve. Nobody's really solved that problem well. So distilling the attribution piece would be good. And it is well suited for marketing campaigns in the ideation phase of so
Read full review
Quantive
Gtmhub is great for aligning cross-functional marketing team members on centralized goals. In general, different positions have different tactics to support the same goal and Gtmhub provides really easy visibility into how each person is contributing. OKRs are a relatively straightforward framework but Gtmhub helps make the planning process much more straightforward than a makeshift or manual solution.
Read full review
Pros
Adobe
  • Rich and engaging learning experiences that capture employees' attention.
  • Is multi-device capable so our teams can take classes where it's most convenient for them during the day, especially if they don't have an assigned static workstation?
  • Allows us to personalize compliance training based on where our employees are at in the organizational chart, competencies, and requirements.
Read full review
Quantive
  • Aligning to overarching goals
  • Relatively simple to use UI with a great recommendation engine as you are building OKRs
  • A lot of support resources for the product as well as for orgs implementing OKRs for the first time
Read full review
Cons
Adobe
  • High initial set-up cost and licensing fees for all employees at one go
  • Once a courses been enrolled by employee, there's no function to remove those courses by themselves.
  • Mobile version not working very well and some contents not able to load, e.g. Leaderboard, Level.
Read full review
Quantive
  • Sometimes can lag a bit - not a deal breaker but an opportunity to be a bit more zippy
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Adobe
Currently, our company uses this program and another competitor for our learning management software. We like the adaptability of this program and appreciate the customer service that Adobe provides, however the other program is starting to turn out to be a better value for our company as they improve their compatibility.
Read full review
Quantive
No answers on this topic
Usability
Adobe
In general, the user experience in Adobe Learning Manager is very satisfactory. The layout of the interface, the structure and the order of the available functionalities make it very intuitive and usable. The adaptation to mobile devices is very convenient since most of the participants connect through these electronic devices.
Read full review
Quantive
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Adobe
On a few occasions, I've logged in to issue a test to a staff member and my course would just spin. I've had to reschedule several test attempts due to this. In my opinion, the issue was not resolved by Adobe
Read full review
Quantive
No answers on this topic
Performance
Adobe
The performance of Adobe Captivate Prime is also extremely good. The user interface is fast and easy to load. The complexity is not nearly as bad as some of the other programs on the market. Speed was not impacted.
Read full review
Quantive
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Adobe
I think they have a competent, friendly and "resolving" team. I have only ever been met with a willingness to assist any and every query I have come across. Roy who is one of the technical people is amazing, and so is my Customer Success Manager, Hema! I do not know what I would do without them.
Read full review
Quantive
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Adobe
Training by my staff was quick. Could have been a bit longer. Had to pick up on things myself
Read full review
Quantive
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Adobe
Trial period was great, and It let me plenty of time to try the different feature of the platform. However, when we decided to move forward, the ADOBE team was slow and not reactive at all. Actually after 2 years, I am still waiting for answers which is quite unacceptable.
Read full review
Quantive
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Adobe
360 keeps up the Adobe learning manager. It even outclasses it in certain parts, but with a huge stalwart tech giant like Adobe, it is hard to keep up. Many of the features are present, but there's always that final touch missing. And it is always trying to play catchup.
Read full review
Quantive
Ease of use, Cost Effective, Continuos evolution of the software
Read full review
Scalability
Adobe
The product's overall scalability and flexibility is extremely good. I wish that the other products our company uses were this flexible! The product is easy to deploy across multiple departments and teams as needed.
Read full review
Quantive
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Adobe
  • We are a small organization, so for now, we aren't quite sure if our ROI is working. But are confident in how this system will help us grow.
  • Our consumers have been truly delighted about the LMS and view us at a much more professional level now.
  • High level of security is very positive.
Read full review
Quantive
  • Better visibility and support across the team
  • Much easier to maintain than a spreadsheet
  • High completion rate of tactics to support goals
Read full review
ScreenShots

Adobe Learning Manager Screenshots

Screenshot of the platform for all learning needs.Screenshot of guided learning journeys.Screenshot of gamification.Screenshot of actionable insight from analytics.Screenshot of learning that’s engaging.Screenshot of measurable analytics.

Quantive Screenshots

Screenshot of Brainstorm OKRsScreenshot of Strategic alignmentScreenshot of Automatic progress measurementScreenshot of performance trackingScreenshot of Progress reports to review organizational strategy