Agiloft offers contract lifecycle management (CLM) software, connecting contractual commitments to real business outcomes using its Data-first Agreement Platform (DAP). With contract data as the foundation, customers can collaboratively reach agreement and leverage contract visibility. Employing artificial intelligence as a legal force multiplier, and integration capabilities as a data liberator, organizations can use Agiloft’s certified implementers to deliver connected,…
N/A
ConnectWise PSA
Score 8.1 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
ConnectWise PSA (formerly Manage) is a business management platform for companies that sell, service, and support technology. The platform is cloud-based and integrates automation, help desk and customer service, sales, marketing, project management, and business analytics. It is the hub of the ConnectWise suite.
$35
Per Tech Per Month
Pricing
Agiloft
ConnectWise PSA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Subscription
$35.00
Per Tech Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agiloft
ConnectWise PSA
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agiloft
ConnectWise PSA
Features
Agiloft
ConnectWise PSA
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
9.5
4 Ratings
16% above category average
ConnectWise PSA
-
Ratings
Contract creation
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract templates
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided logic
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
8.8
4 Ratings
8% above category average
ConnectWise PSA
-
Ratings
Contract sharing
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract editing
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval process
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
7.7
4 Ratings
7% below category average
ConnectWise PSA
-
Ratings
Contract database
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract search
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom contract reports
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tracking contract status
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance check
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
7.4
1 Ratings
6% below category average
ConnectWise PSA
-
Ratings
Contract Storage
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced Search and Filtering
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable Contract Templates
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Acceleration
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
E-Signatures
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reminders and Alerts
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with other Systems
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
-
Ratings
ConnectWise PSA
8.8
89 Ratings
7% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
9.489 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
6.950 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
8.562 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
8.169 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
00 Ratings
9.989 Ratings
Ticket response
00 Ratings
9.788 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
-
Ratings
ConnectWise PSA
7.8
83 Ratings
3% below category average
External knowledge base
00 Ratings
8.768 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
00 Ratings
6.978 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft is great for storing contracts and being able to run reports on those contracts. Where is lacks is when there are amendments to the contracts which change information that you will run a report on. Since the data doesn't stack, if I wanted to run a report on any agreement with unpaid time off and there was unpaid time off added in the first amendment but removed in the second amendment, the first amendment would still hit the report even though the unpaid time off was removed in a later amendment
BrightGauge lets us know when we have critical issues that need solving. A massive influx of tickets all at the same time triggers an investigation. Usually, it is tied to a server going down, which we can address. It would not be helpful for a small MSP or IT department with just a few daily tickets. The stats are better used to track a large amount of clients.
Tickets- Customers can email and a ticket is generated and falls under their profile for historical records. You can save documents and select if they are customer facing or only internal facing. The option as well to have communication in tickets whether its internal facing or customer facing is nice to have when you're trying to keep a record or important details for just internal means and the customer doesn't have to see all the jargon.
Procurement - It's great to have this integrate with Quosal Sell. Quotes being processed into opportunities and then into a sales order which connects to a ticket or project is pretty easy to use. It does have a learning curve but once you get the hang of it, it's straightforward. Everything is pretty connected, whether keeping track of products customers have purchased historically through us, to knowing what ticket is associated to an RMA.
Annual or more than annualized data is desperately needed for MSPs to show trends, current limitation is previous 240 days for ConnectWise tickets
Alerts when datasets do not sync properly, I have to rely on my team to notice vs get an automated alert from BrightGauge
Small thing, but it would be nice to have more options on the report scheduler to enable a start date. If you wish to do it quarterly, you have to start the schedule exactly 3 months from the next run.
ConnectWise has uniquely positioned themselves with the Modern Office Suite to have direct integration with a nearly full suite of tools for MSPs. Although each tool may not necessarily be the absolute best tool on the market, the efficiencies leveraged through direct integration make the entire suite an obvious choice for most companies.
As with our brains, we only use 10% of its capability. It can be as complex as you want it to be or as simple. The training requirements to use it have been minimal depending on the application. This is really a reflection as to how the workflow was configured
I have been using ConnectWise since 2004 and I am impressed with the progress they have made. However, there are still bugs that don't work quite like they should. If I were to run reports and get consistent answers along with a couple other annoyances, then I would score CW as a 10
We use the cloud version of ConnectWise and in the last 5 years it has never been down for us during business hours. I can only recall 1 time when it was not available during off hours when we wanted to use it.
Some tab for certain areas load speeds could be better. Dashboards can load slowly when they reference multiple reports. Some reports can load slowly based on the tables and views they are accessing. At times the SQL queries being performed in the background can actually timeout and a tab or screen will fail to load.
Implementation was relatively easy and I have not had any issues with the support. UI change created some challenges for the end-users, but overall, it was a smooth experience. I hope the company will continue investing in the product and not consider it as something to not care about too much. I believe Agiloft does not make any other software, so I think the focus on it should not wane.
The front line support techs are wildly inconsistent when it comes to the level of support. Sometimes you get someone who just wants to throw links to University documentation at you, sometimes you get someone who truly tries to understand your issue and confers with peers and managers to find an answer, and sometimes you get someone who just wants to create a ticket and escalate immediately. If you ask three different techs the same question you will probably get three different answers, one of them being, "That's not possible."
We are a telecoms company. Whilst CW were very happy to sell us their product and tell us how good it is for telecoms. All the training material is geared towards IT MSP's. The on-line training material was virtually useless. We found the implementation a bit of a joke. They tried telling us 12 hours of implementation time would be sufficient to launch the product. We erred on the side of caution and paid for 24 hours. This was quickly eaten away and we were nowhere near ready to go-live. I find the on-line chat facility is of much more use for us.
Rather than letting them sell you a block of time for implementation, create a list of things that must be completed do declare the implementation complete. The implementer will have the discretion on what they set up and in what order. They will be trying to end their services in as little time as possible and may not get things set up right. You are best advised to hire a third-party wizard that has done many of these setups. Record the audio and video of all of your implementation sessions.
Prior to implementing Agiloft, we used ProLaw. ProLaw acts as an electronic library for all contracts across the company. We were able to get this to work for us but it was limited in what functionality it provided. Agiloft is far superior when it comes to tracking and contract generation. Both systems store the agreements; however, Agiloft does a lot of the work for us. It creates the agreements with the click of a button, manages user permissions, sends automated reminders without requiring setup. These are all things ProLaw either didn't have or had but required manual entry. I was not the one who selected Agiloft as our new system, but after using it I can see why it was chosen.
Everyone but dynamics had holes in it. Dynamics is good, but it requires more development time. I spoke with some people that have CW and liked it. But when I inquired after our frustrations, I discovered they had a full time scheduling & logistics CW manager and the field people were using it purely like any other more simplistic ticket system. They said it would be impossible otherwise. The one big difference is the transparency of the sales effort. The other sales people were honest on the limitations or potential challenges and worked with us. They also worked with our agenda. At CW they don't have that option. The consulting time is eaten through a pre-formatted agenda which they communicate too you, not with you.
ConnectWise seems to have a good understanding of the IT service industry. During the required onboarding training, they even preach configuring only features that you need right now, as you can always scale up later. The feature set for the most part takes into considerations all aspects of an IT business, whether small or enterprise, or growing from one to the next.