Airship vs. Google Content Experiments (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Airship
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The Airship Experience Platform provides an end-to-end solution for unifying experiences across channels and capturing value across the entire customer lifecycle.N/A
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.N/A
Pricing
AirshipGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AirshipGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AirshipGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Features
AirshipGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Airship
-
Ratings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
1 Ratings
10% above category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Airship
-
Ratings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Airship
-
Ratings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.9
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Click analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Conversion tracking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Goal tracking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AirshipGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Small Businesses
OneSignal
OneSignal
Score 8.0 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AirshipGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(18 ratings)
9.0
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(10 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AirshipGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Airship (formerly Urban Airship)
Well-Suited for: 1. Mobile App Notifications: Ideal for targeted push notifications in apps. 2. Customer Segmentation: Effective for personalized marketing campaigns based on user data. 3. Event-Triggered Automation: Great for automated messaging based on user actions. 4. A/B Testing: Useful for optimizing campaign messages and strategies. Less Appropriate for: 1. Non-Mobile Channels: Less effective if the primary focus is on non-mobile communications like email or direct mail. 2. Basic Email Marketing: Other platforms might be better suited for simple, broad email campaigns without complex segmentation or personalization needs.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Do you already have Google Analytics? If so content experiments is a good, free, starting point to dip your toes in A/B testing. Do you need to run Multivariate experiments? If so, Google Content Experiments is not going to fit your needs.
Read full review
Pros
Airship (formerly Urban Airship)
  • The marketing push notifications are very effective, and it gives us free hand to define different business criteria to target user groups
  • The user experience or the message content could differ from Android and iOS, and this is a huge benefit for us
  • As an Architect, troubleshooting an issue is very detailed and the time it takes to troubleshoot an issue is considerably less from our previous product
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Quick and easy to create and set up experiments
  • Results are presented in a way that is familiar and easy for any Google Analytics user to understand. So is great for beginners to conversion testing
  • Already integrated into Google Analytics and can measure results against your existing conversion goals
  • Allows nine possible variants to be A/B tested
  • Features more than one testing methodology, Bayesian (Multi-Armed Bandit,) and Full Factorial
  • Allows the user to select one of three possible confidence thresholds to ensure that experiment results are robust
  • Great value, it is free!
Read full review
Cons
Airship (formerly Urban Airship)
  • The automated A/B testing winner selection and application should be added
  • The flexibility of message shape, specifically incorporating transparency so messages do not need to be a rectangular shape
  • Faster and more reliable servers around the globe
  • Making more detailed use cases and tutorials to be followed can simplify things for users
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Their documentation is not the best and it's quite a steep learning curve.
  • They also don't tell you particularly well what sorts of things you should be testing.
  • Compared to other suppliers of A/B testing tools- it needs a simpler interface. Optimize is starting to answer that - but is still quite Beta-like.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Airship (formerly Urban Airship)
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
Read full review
Usability
Airship (formerly Urban Airship)
The interface takes a bit getting used to in order to know how to take advantage of everything. Some of the analytics that are available are particularly hard to find, so it's important to pay attention when customer support reviews everything, but everything I'd want and need in terms of Push and In-App messaging is all there.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Airship (formerly Urban Airship)
I have not had to interact much with customer support as I have been able to find the vast majority of the answers I'm looking for within their documentation, which I very much appreciate because it saves me a lot of time. Customer support has been responsive and helpful for the most part during the couple of interactions I've had.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Airship (formerly Urban Airship)
We've tested a bunch of different CRM tools over the years and Airship has been a winner for its functionality, features, cost, and ability to integrate with other softwares that we use. It has been great for SMS and mobile in particular. It could certainly be a one stop shop for CRM.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Airship (formerly Urban Airship)
  • The ROI has increased more than approx. 50% (exact details to be confirmed) based on cross-channel orchestration
  • Using push notifications alone, we have seen a huge increase in app engagement which was a challenge before to nudge users to get back to the App after initial download
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • CE has made efficient time use easy and fool-proof when it comes to learning the software
  • Because it integrates with other Google programs there is a benefit to track with Google Analytics
  • The learning curve can create initiate time investment that may go beyond what companies are willing to dedicate.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Airship Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of