AkkenCloud
is a cloud-based ATS developed by Akken Inc in New Hampshire. This product
offers the full suite of features typical of applicant tracking systems:
A
user-friendly interface and mobile device integration Batch
or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels such as
email or by leveraging its integration with social networking sites (e.g.
LinkedIn) Instantaneous
posting to multiple job boards Job
alerts and category sorted…
N/A
Cornerstone Galaxy
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Cornerstone Galaxy is a cloud-based application for talent management. Cornerstone offers suites for recruiting, training, performance monitoring and planning, learning, and HR data management. It is scaled for enterprises.
N/A
Pricing
AkkenCloud
Cornerstone Galaxy
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AkkenCloud
Cornerstone Galaxy
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AkkenCloud
Cornerstone Galaxy
Features
AkkenCloud
Cornerstone Galaxy
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
AkkenCloud
7.7
8 Ratings
3% below category average
Cornerstone Galaxy
5.8
67 Ratings
20% below category average
Job Requisition Management
6.18 Ratings
7.045 Ratings
Company Website Posting
8.67 Ratings
8.041 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
8.65 Ratings
9.038 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
8.75 Ratings
9.038 Ratings
Resume Management
9.47 Ratings
5.043 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
9.28 Ratings
5.040 Ratings
Candidate Search
4.08 Ratings
6.041 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
7.58 Ratings
6.041 Ratings
Collaboration
4.88 Ratings
4.036 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
8.27 Ratings
5.038 Ratings
Email Templates
8.05 Ratings
4.560 Ratings
User Permissions
9.05 Ratings
3.061 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.05 Ratings
3.556 Ratings
Reporting
8.06 Ratings
3.564 Ratings
Customized Application Form
00 Ratings
8.040 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
AkkenCloud
-
Ratings
Cornerstone Galaxy
6.5
134 Ratings
11% below category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.569 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
5.7116 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
6.4127 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
AkkenCloud
-
Ratings
Cornerstone Galaxy
8.4
115 Ratings
14% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.596 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.099 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.0107 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.595 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
9.0110 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
AkkenCloud
-
Ratings
Cornerstone Galaxy
8.5
122 Ratings
21% above category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.594 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
8.581 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
9.070 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
9.082 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
9.097 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
8.064 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.094 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
9.086 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
9.083 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.3116 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
AkkenCloud
-
Ratings
Cornerstone Galaxy
6.5
58 Ratings
4% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
6.049 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
5.049 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
8.052 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
7.049 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
I don't know many other scenarios, as I have been with this company for 13 years and in this industry for roughly 25 years. It is a tool that is well suited for our company and this industry in general. As a staffing company, you can accomplish nearly everything imaginable with this tool. The only area I have seen that might not be ideal is if you wanted to run all kinds of metrics. You can run a variety of reports in Akken, the data fields are limited sometimes and one would think that wouldn't need to be the case. You should be able to put whatever data you want in any field to create the report you need.
Cornerstone Galaxy is a good solution for larger companies that focus on training and want to offer a variety of options to their employees and departments. It is highly customizable. It does require a tech savvy team to set-up, and maintain. This is not a set-it-and-forget-it system. From an LMS perspective, it wouldn't be my top choice for employees who only need a mobile-friendly approach.
Ability to provide multiple customizable access roles from general end user to full system admin and anything in between
Powerful reporting system in the LMS to track a plethora of data points within the platform (user data, training information, transcript information)
Great options to customize the look and feel of your "home page" to best meet your company's needs and goals.
Ability to customize the transcript view for learners (i.e. when Completed training will move to their Archived transcript, what to do with Inactive training on transcripts)
This is the worst ATS I've ever used. It's hard to find what you need. It's not set up in a coherent manner and things are all over the place.
I have to download a resume just to view it.
The parse function only works in Internet Explorer and it works poorly then. Makes it impossible to tell if its actually a duplicate because it flags everything.
No section for meaningful notes. Notes are all just reports of action.
No way to make it efficient for direct hires. All geared towards staffing so it makes you fill out non-sense information that will be inaccurate and irrelevant just to satisfy field requirements.
Sometimes finding the right answer to your support question can be a bit more difficult than it should be.
I would like to see more OSHA related courses.
At times, the administrative interface seems to need to be updated, but the tradeoff honestly might be the absolute rock-solid stability of the platform.
There is no reason for us to make a switch. Everybody in the office is familiar with it and it allows us to get our work done faster. There are no pressing issues that would warrant a change at this point
As long as pricing stays reasonable, we will likely stay with Cornerstone for at least one more contract renewal. It would be a large task to migrate all of our content to a new system. However, the LMS landscape is diversifying with new startups that are showing some real innovation.
Easy to use, easy to learn, lots of support during the learning process. There are a few parts of the system we don't use and I'm hesitant to begin using because other clients have said they're difficult and cumbersome (certifications) or outdated (libraries)
I haven't really had any major availability problems. The service is practically impeccable but it is true that at times, due to server and latency problems, the application has been slower. But these have been specific issues that have resolved themselves.
It's an average tool. The calendar function isn't great, email is slow, and there always seem to be day-to-day issues. The functionality is mostly there for a staffing firm, but there are plenty of areas of improvement still needed
I haven't seen many issues at all with load times. Sometimes learning assignments will take longer then expected but it is still reasonable. They have taken great effort over the last couple years to speed things up like reports and search results so I expect that effort to continue in the coming year.
The best support we have received has been from sales. Customer success is pretty much a joke. We have been yelled at by customer success reps; been told to take a screenshot of something we are not seeing; been told there are no issues on there in when Akken hadn't been working for hours, only to have it magically fixed shortly after we reported the problem; and been told engineering was working on a problem for weeks without resolution. If you are going to be working with IT Staffing companies, you have to understand that we have a modicum of knowledge in IT, and you can't BS us. Honesty will get you a lot farther than stringing us along with BS.
Its always important to have support when you are facing problems and when you are the main admin of the organization. Cornerstone Support is very supporting when you have not found the answer in the help guide. its very useful to have a team support to guide you.
we use also to admin all our training in person events and sessions. Its easy to admin this kind of trainings and automatize some processes we have. Also de user experience and the integration with other systems helps to the employees to use more. All modules integrated oriented to develop people is the principal reason to have CSOD. The training administration is very complete and allows to automate many processes.
The online modules are pretty good. You can access them at any time, which we have done. You learn a lot in the beginning, but having the ability to retake short lessons when you are working on those items was very helpful.
The implementation was pretty difficult. We felt they (Cornerstone) didn’t properly allocate the resources to complete our implementation in the timetable we wanted.
For example, we worked on Workday and SSO integrations - work that we had specifically contracted for in advance. When we were ready to work on that project, they didn’t have the people ready to help us, so it took a lot longer than necessary. That was my biggest pain point.
The implementation approach we went with was a self-led implementation. We would speak to the implementation manager once per week, and self-trained. We met with implementation manager to discuss issues, review things that we’d learned for 1 hour. We found that wasn’t enough. Other things would come up outside that one hour window that we couldn’t get answers to. We didn’t have anyone to ask about those things and we had to wait to ask during our weekly meeting.
The advantage of the self-led implementation approach was that it was really inexpensive – significantly less than the implementation cost for the other systems that we looked at. I also liked that we could pace ourselves. There were however big roadblocks. We would have to make sure the right resources were available. We had an implementation/project manager with a lot of experience and felt that the person was knowledgeable but missed on a few things.
In hindsight, I would still go with the self-led implementation, but knowing what I know now, I would ask for the integration person to be available more. I would work that into the contract. With single sign-on, we needed deep linking to build direct links through a Single Sign-On tool, e.g. when someone gets an email, it directs them to training. But it has to go through SSO to get them to the correct link. Deep linking wasn’t turned on in our system and they had to activate it. We encountered little things like that – sequencing pre-requisites which were problematic. We tried to troubleshoot ourselves.
I recommend you consider contracting for some extra implementation hours and determine when they are going to be available. Work it into the contract that you have the ability to call tech support during implementation. In addition to weekly implementation meetings, they have technical webexes – 4 every week, but 2 didn’t apply to us – one as we were using SSO. The challenge is they were not always relevant – we had specific questions that didn’t fall into those categories
We preferred the ability to go with Mac computers. That was the number one selling point for us. Besides that we liked the ease of the product. The email interface looked exactly like Outlook. The calendar the same. The price was also a big selling point. It came in slightly cheaper than Bullhorn and other systems and in our opinion a better product.
The user experience is a lot better than using SumTotal as an admin CSOD makes working easy. Without having workarounds. Reporting is a lot better than both platforms. Reporting in CSOD is complex however easy to manage and create when you understand the data points collected
It is important to be familiar with the terms and annual increases in licenses and other aspects of the contract. I recommend analyzing this from the beginning and the permanence is relevant because Cornerstone updates its modules and brings out new features that may allow you to leave a module to acquire another
As I have said before, I have no doubt that the services of the Cornerstone sales people were very good. In particular, our salesperson spent a lot of time in contact with us to make the process go smoothly. Perhaps being a large company in some cases the times were slowed down but it is something normal to take into account.
Sometimes the system is slow and the process of hiring someone is lengthy so it takes a long time to complete it so it takes away from other things I could be working on
It’s easy and quick to manage candidates to show what process they’re in