Alauda Container Platform vs. GitLab vs. Jenkins

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Alauda Container Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Alauda Container Platform (ACP) is an enterprise-grade cloud-native platform designed to accelerate digital transformation. Built on Kubernetes, ACP automates the management of diverse and dynamic infrastructures and supports modern application development and operations. It simplifies the deployment of containerized applications across hybrid and multi-cloud environments, while providing enhanced security, observability, and scalability. With ACP, enterprises can unlock innovation, optimize IT…N/A
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. Differentiators, as described by Gitlab: Simplicity: With GitLab, DevSecOps can…
$0
per month per user
Jenkins
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Jenkins is an open source automation server. Jenkins provides hundreds of plugins to support building, deploying and automating any project. As an extensible automation server, Jenkins can be used as a simple CI server or turned into a continuous delivery hub for any project.N/A
Pricing
Alauda Container PlatformGitLabJenkins
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
GitLab Essential
$0
per month per user
GitLab Premium
$29
per month per user
GitLab Ultimate
$99
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Alauda Container PlatformGitLabJenkins
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Alauda Container PlatformGitLabJenkins
Considered Multiple Products
Alauda Container Platform

No answer on this topic

GitLab
Chose GitLab
The company has had prior experience with Bamboo. GitLab has much more functionality than Bamboo and worked better with some of our legacy projects. While Jenkins is free, it really isn't free - the amount of work required to get something up and running would have been …
Chose GitLab
GitLab fits our needs much better because it is a all-in-one solution and is easier to learn. We have a wide range of users - senior software developers and people who only write small, easy scripts or just start pipelines. Jenkins is rather useful when e.g. more fine-grained …
Chose GitLab
GitLab is an all-in-one Git and CI/CD platform that also offers generous credits in its free plan. It allows both private and public projects. The pipelines can be fully defined in YAML files put under version control.
Chose GitLab
We have recently migrated from Bamboo to GitLab across our enterprise as part of our tech modernization roadmap. GitLab provides a all-in-one platform for integrated code management. The only advantage that Bamboo had over GitLab was the integration with JIRA. The streamlined …
Chose GitLab
i have more exoerence in GitLab rather than Bitbucket . As personally , it is good for me to understand how things is going on. i have used personally and also in organisation . It is great for developer to see there 3 months ago code and also can come up with new solution to …
Chose GitLab
It was a management decision to use GitLab over other tools. It integrates well with RBAC using Terraform. Runners are easy to setup. Almost all the features the organization used before are available in GitLab.
Chose GitLab
Software delivery is the key objective and GitLab made it much easier to hit the group quickly. It worked well with automation, and integrations with other SDLC tools used in the Organization and it is really easy to use. It's widely adopted and has the power to deliver what we …
Chose GitLab
We migrated from Gerrit to GitLab, and minus a few minor bumps during migration, GitLab has been hands down better. Our devs have faster time to code review with notifications, the UI is easy to navigate and, and our pipeline is integrated and automated, so once everything is …
Chose GitLab
Gitlab provided on par functionality and it provided a good option for us to self host which is very important for our business. We think the business continuity story is more solid with Gitlab.
Chose GitLab
GitLab is easily the preferred tool when it comes to versioning and source control. With other tools the UI often feels outdated and clunky leading to inefficiency and confusion. With some of the sleeker tools such as GitKraken, while the aesthetic is pleasing, the experience …
Chose GitLab
More friendly interface and very intuitive.
Chose GitLab
Git has a Distributed Model. SVN has a Centralized Model. In git every user has their own copy of code on their local like their own branch. In SVN there is central repository has working copy that also make changes and committed in central repository
Chose GitLab
I was not part of the decision for GitLab.
Chose GitLab
1) Good support from the community.
2) Easy to implement and understand
3) Easy to manage GitLab runners.
Chose GitLab
Sometimes it gets very slow and provides a problem to connect or update the servers. Search is difficult on some pages. Some features are missing that are available on GitHub.
Chose GitLab
Even though all three tools are also useful for their own merit, we found GitLab to be the best supported and most customizable for our needs. It is useful to know that the product today is what we need it to be and the community is there to keep it updated if we need more …
Chose GitLab
  • GitLab was chosen for the auto dev ops feature over GitHub, but then GitHub shortly then came out with GitHub Actions.
  • We also moved from GitHub enterprise to GitLab, so cost-wise was cheaper as we didn't have to host GitLab.
  • GoCD was too slow and restrictive for our liking.
Chose GitLab
GitLab is the best combination of all the other tools. They are still viable in their own sense, but for the projects we were using, GitLab proved to be an excellent alternative.
Jenkins
Chose Jenkins
GitLab CI and GitHub Actions are other powerful options in the market also with a rising popularity and high interoperability with their respective platform.
But Jenkins is still a good option for complex pipelines that require scripting and logic. Also, Jenkins uses as runtime …
Chose Jenkins
Overall, Jenkins is the easiest platform for someone who has no experience to come in and use effectively. We can get a junior engineer into Jenkins, give them access, and point them in the right direction with minimal hand-holding. The competing products I have used (TravisCI/G…
Chose Jenkins
Bitbucket building was very slow, in order to improve that you have to upgrade to spend double or more minutes per build minute. The GUI was also very slow in updating on the progress of the builds, making things rather confusing. GitLab worked a bit better in my opinion, but …
Chose Jenkins
Jenkins is highly customizable, making it ideal for complex pipelines that require scripting, conditional logic, and integration with a variety of tools.Jenkins offers thousands of plugins, giving it unmatched versatility.
Chose Jenkins
Jenkins is highly customizable and flexible, supporting a wide range of plugins and integrations. Jenkins works with any version control system (Git, Subversion, etc.). Jenkins has a more mature ecosystem, and it may be better for large-scale, complex environments, especially …
Chose Jenkins
It's mostly stable and well-known within the DevOps community.
Chose Jenkins
Both Jenkins and TeamCity do a good job of automating CI/CD. Jenkins runs much leaner than TeamCity - it only needs about a Gig of free memory, whereas TeamCity needs a fat 4 Gig free. Many tasks in Jenkins yml config can be very cumbersome, especially running local and …
Chose Jenkins
Originally Jenkins was selected because it was the best around, but it has since been outclassed by more specific services or cloud-based services and tools that will do all of the heavy lifting for you. Jenkins still has a use case - but it's hard to argue the additional …
Chose Jenkins
Jenkins immense flexibility and its large and impressive selection of available community-driven plugins makes it ideal choice for solving non-traditional problems.

However, for CI/CD - consider the benefit of modern tools that enforce reusable, infrastructure as code design …
Chose Jenkins
I would use TeamCity if Jenkins was not already in place. TeamCity seems a lot more stable when it comes to upgrading the software and job templates the way TeamCity handles them is an absolute killer feature. Jenkins is a bit of a wild animal, quite unpredictable but with the …
Features
Alauda Container PlatformGitLabJenkins
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Alauda Container Platform
8.3
1 Ratings
4% above category average
GitLab
-
Ratings
Jenkins
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools7.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Alauda Container PlatformGitLabJenkins
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Alauda Container PlatformGitLabJenkins
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(154 ratings)
7.1
(74 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(6 ratings)
6.7
(8 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.9
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(12 ratings)
6.6
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Alauda Container PlatformGitLabJenkins
Likelihood to Recommend
Alauda Inc.
Scenario: A financial institution needs to use both private cloud (sensitive data) and public cloud (high-concurrency business) at the same time. Dispersed resources lead to high operation and maintenance costs.Solution: Use Alauda to uniformly manage heterogeneous clusters, achieve one-click deployment of cross-cloud applications, intelligent traffic scheduling, and visualized cost analysis.
Read full review
GitLab
GitLab is good if you work a lot with code and do complex repository actions. It gives you a very good overview of what were the states of your branches and the files in them at different stages in time. It's also way easier and more efficient to write pipelines for CI\CD. It's easier to read and it's easier to write them. It takes fewer clicks to achieve the same things with GitLab than it does for competitor products.
Read full review
Open Source
Jenkins is a highly customizable CI/CD tool with excellent community support. One can use Jenkins to build and deploy monolith services to microservices with ease. It can handle multiple "builds" per agent simultaneously, but the process can be resource hungry, and you need some impressive specs server for that. With Jenkins, you can automate almost any task. Also, as it is an open source, we can save a load of money by not spending on enterprise CI/CD tools.
Read full review
Pros
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
  • GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
  • It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
  • Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
  • Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Automated Builds: Jenkins is configured to monitor the version control system for new pull requests. Once a pull request is created, Jenkins automatically triggers a build process. It checks out the code, compiles it, and performs any necessary build steps specified in the configuration.
  • Unit Testing: Jenkins runs the suite of unit tests defined for the project. These tests verify the functionality of individual components and catch any regressions or errors. If any unit tests fail, Jenkins marks the build as unsuccessful, and the developer is notified to fix the issues.
  • Code Analysis: Jenkins integrates with code analysis tools like SonarQube or Checkstyle. It analyzes the code for quality, adherence to coding standards, and potential bugs or vulnerabilities. The results are reported back to the developer and the product review team for further inspection.
Read full review
Cons
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
  • CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
  • Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
  • Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.
Read full review
Open Source
  • The UI could be slightly better, it feels kind of like the 90s, but it works well.
  • An easier way to filter jobs other than views on the dashboard.
  • An easier way to read the console logs when tests do fail.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I really feel the platform has matured quite faster than others, and it is always at the top of its game compared to the different vendors like GitHub, Azure pipelines, CircleCI, Travis, Jenkins. Since it provides, agents, CI/CD, repository hosting, Secrets management, user management, and Single Sign on; among other features
Read full review
Open Source
We have a certain buy-in as we have made a lot of integrations and useful tools around jenkins, so it would cost us quite some time to change to another tool. Besides that, it is very versatile, and once you have things set up, it feels unnecessary to change tool. It is also a plus that it is open source.
Read full review
Usability
Alauda Inc.
1. Support unified orchestration and scheduling of cross-cloud resources to meet business elasticity requirements in complex environments. 2. Built-in CI/CD, monitoring and other functions, significantly improving the entire application delivery cycle. 3. Active in large and medium-sized clusters (thousands of nodes), low control failure rate, suitable for core business load.
Read full review
GitLab
I find it easy to use, I haven't had to do the integration work, so that's why it is a 9/10, cause I can't speak to how easy that part was or the initial set up, but day to day use is great!
Read full review
Open Source
Jenkins streamlines development and provides end to end automated integration and deployment. It even supports Docker and Kubernetes using which container instances can be managed effectively. It is easy to add documentation and apply role based access to files and services using Jenkins giving full control to the users. Any deviation can be easily tracked using the audit logs.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I've never had experienced outages from GItlab itself, but regarding the code I have deployed to Gitlab, the history helps a lot to trace the cause of the issue or performing a rollback to go back to a working version
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Performance
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
GItlab reponsiveness is amazing, has never left me IDLE. I've never had issues even with complex projects. I have not experienced any issues when integrating it with agents for example or SSO
Read full review
Open Source
No, when we integrated this with GitHub, it becomes more easy and smart to manage and control our workforce. Our distributed workforce is now streamlined to a single bucket. All of our codes and production outputs are now automatically synced with all the workers. There are many cases when our in-house team makes changes in the release, our remote workers make another release with other environment variables. So it is better to get all of the work in control.
Read full review
Support Rating
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft
Read full review
Open Source
As with all open source solutions, the support can be minimal and the information that you can find online can at times be misleading. Support may be one of the only real downsides to the overall software package. The user community can be helpful and is needed as the product is not the most user-friendly thing we have used.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
No answers on this topic
Open Source
It is worth well the time to setup Jenkins in a docker container. It is also well worth to take the time to move any "Jenkins configuration" into Jenkinsfiles and not take shortcuts.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
Gitlab seems more cutting-edge than GitHub; however, its AI tools are not yet as mature as those of CoPilot. It feels like the next-generation product, so as we selected a tool for our startup, we decided to invest in the disruptor in the space. While there are fewer out-of-the-box templates for Gitlab, we have never discovered a lack of feature parity.
Read full review
Open Source
Overall, Jenkins is the easiest platform for someone who has no experience to come in and use effectively. We can get a junior engineer into Jenkins, give them access, and point them in the right direction with minimal hand-holding. The competing products I have used (TravisCI/GitLab/Azure) provide other options but can obfuscate the process due to the lack of straightforward simplicity. In other areas (capability, power, customization), Jenkins keeps up with the competition and, in some areas, like customization, exceeds others.
Read full review
Scalability
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I think is very well designed, and like any VCS it works as intended
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Alauda Inc.
No answers on this topic
GitLab
  • GitLab cut down our spent on container, package and infrastructure registry
  • Best thing is we can now have everything in single platform which cost effective too
  • Quality of support is really good and they do have emergency support team as well which is great
Read full review
Open Source
  • Faster Time-to-Market: Jenkins automate the build, testing, and deployment process, enabling faster feedback and continuous improvement.
  • Improved Quality: Jenkins automatically run unit tests and integration tests, ensuring that code changes meet the necessary quality standards.
  • Cost Savings: Jenkins is an open-source tool that is free to use
Read full review
ScreenShots

GitLab Screenshots

Screenshot of GitLab, a comprehensive DevSecOps platform.Screenshot of Security DashboardScreenshot of Merge Request