| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Amazon Aurora | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Amazon Aurora is a global-scale relational database service built for the cloud with full MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility. | N/A |
| Amazon Aurora | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Amazon Aurora | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Amazon Aurora Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora All those products are very similar. the difference is the interface, the support and the API available for deploy the service. The main difference is cost Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora . Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora In my opinion, much better and is also more cost effective based on other products we've reviewed. We also utilize other products from AWS and it makes a perfect fit for not only our environment but the clients we work with as well. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora Aurora vs Athena: Aurora provided MySQL/Postgres/MariaDB as DB engine whereas Athena provides SQL interface over data stored in S3 as datalake. Aurora has high performance compared to Athena. Aurora vs Redshift:- Different Architectures. Redshift is faster as its engine is a … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora
Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora I wish Amazon Aurora was compatible with more than just PostgreSQL and MySQL. Mongodb Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora Microsoft Azure SQL Database Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora Because most of our resources were already deployed within our AWS account, we wanted to have everything under the same umbrella. Moreover, AWS workload identity layer was crucial in providing passwordless authentication to our Aurora endpoints. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora Each AWS service is best in its own way. Aurora is best in relational database. Codebuild is best when building and testing the application in SDLC and AWS CodePipeline is another solution for CI CD pipeline in Agile. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora Amazon Aurora s strength is in the cost as it is economical, secure, and offers a huge storage space of 128 terabytes. Compared to its competitors, Aurora has a nice console offering ease of use through the click, copy and drag options. As per the requirement, the database can … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Amazon Aurora Aurora vs RDS: Better replication and performance of Aurora as compared to RDS. Almost zero replication lag in most cases which is a big improvement over RDS. Scaling, maintenance, and overall ROI are higher in Aurora. Aurora vs Percona: Aurora comes well integrated with the … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
94% Would buy again 34 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
97% Delivers good value for the price 29 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
97% Happy with the feature set 35 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 24 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
100% Implementation went as expected 31 Answers | |
| Amazon Aurora | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Database-as-a-Service |
|
| Amazon Aurora | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Amazon ElastiCache Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon Aurora | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.9 |
| Usability | 9.1 |
| Availability | 9.7 |
| Support Rating | 1.0 |
| Online Training | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 |
| Amazon Aurora | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Reliability and Availability |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots | Amazon Aurora Screenshots |
