Amazon Aurora

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Aurora
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Aurora is a global-scale relational database service built for the cloud with full MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Aurora
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Aurora
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Aurora
Considered Both Products
Amazon Aurora
Chose Amazon Aurora
SQL Server requires a license, and it's another hectic our organization did not want to go with.
Chose Amazon Aurora
Both Acquia Digital Experience Platform and Amazon Aurora use MySQL and PostgreSQL. Acquia of course has more compatibility with other database system like MariaDB. But Amazon Aurora provides maximum 100GB for a single subscription and in subscription we can have multiple …
Chose Amazon Aurora
Aurora offers automatic scaling for both read and write operations. While Azure does provide that option too, the easy of using Aurora and higher. Also, Aurora has a very high availability too.
Chose Amazon Aurora
They're all great products to use and it really varies on your business use case. We picked Amazon Aurora because of its high availability support and scales very well
Chose Amazon Aurora
Just about the same. We use Azure SQL for some of our larger projects.
Chose Amazon Aurora
We selected Aurora for the possibility of both MySQL and PostgreSQL.
Chose Amazon Aurora
MongoDB is also powerful and efficient with a large amount of data, well RavenDB is much powerful than Mongo, and has more facilities which I like and is better than Mongo. But, Amazon Aurora is much more powerful and confidential data management system, having a cool …
Chose Amazon Aurora
All those products are very similar. the difference is the interface, the support and the API available for deploy the service.
The main difference is cost
Chose Amazon Aurora
I have selected because of its in built security feature which makes my data secure and also have an ability to create backup automatically. It is a fully managed relation database engine that is compatible with MySql and PostgreSQL. It has server less computing.
Chose Amazon Aurora
Fully managed
cost effective
backups
Chose Amazon Aurora
In my opinion, much better and is also more cost effective based on other products we've reviewed. We also utilize other products from AWS and it makes a perfect fit for not only our environment but the clients we work with as well.
Chose Amazon Aurora
In my opinion, Amazon Aurora has all of the advantages of Amazon RDS for MySQL, with additional performance benefits.
Chose Amazon Aurora
Aurora vs Athena: Aurora provided MySQL/Postgres/MariaDB as DB engine whereas Athena provides SQL interface over data stored in S3 as datalake. Aurora has high performance compared to Athena.

Aurora vs Redshift:- Different Architectures. Redshift is faster as its engine is a …
Chose Amazon Aurora
  • Performance and Scalability: If an organization requires high performance and the ability to scale seamlessly to handle varying workloads, Amazon Aurora's architecture is well-suited for these needs.
  • High Availability: Organizations that prioritize uptime and require automatic …
Chose Amazon Aurora
Because most of our resources were already deployed within our AWS account, we wanted to have everything under the same umbrella. Moreover, AWS workload identity layer was crucial in providing passwordless authentication to our Aurora endpoints.
Chose Amazon Aurora
Each AWS service is best in its own way. Aurora is best in relational database. Codebuild is best when building and testing the application in SDLC and AWS CodePipeline is another solution for CI CD pipeline in Agile.
Chose Amazon Aurora
The scalability, availability, and the iOPS are clearly the winners for Aurora. Other offerings are more managed solutions where again the focus shifts to the resources rather than the product.
Chose Amazon Aurora

Unlike proprietary solutions like Microsoft SQL Server, Amazon Aurora does not need proprietary licensing, so we can use this budget to get cloud solutions with high availability and performance, at a similar rate. When compared to MySQL or Postgres SQL, it allows us to have a …

Chose Amazon Aurora
Aurora exists to provide the convenience of a MySQL style language with as many automated features as possible where AWS can manage them independently or provide a user interface or CLI to easily allow us as administrators and developers to configure the settings beyond the …
Chose Amazon Aurora
Aurora vs RDS: Better replication and performance of Aurora as compared to RDS. Almost zero replication lag in most cases which is a big improvement over RDS. Scaling, maintenance, and overall ROI are higher in Aurora.

Aurora vs Percona: Aurora comes well integrated with the …
Chose Amazon Aurora
Aurora offers an easy-to-use MySQL or Postgres compatible database that is cloud native. This is great for LAMP / LAPP stack applications as it shortens development time considerably as you no longer need to spend time setting up databases, setting up database backups, and so …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Amazon Aurora
Database-as-a-Service
Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Aurora
9.1
26 Ratings
4% above category average
Automatic software patching8.926 Ratings
Database scalability9.426 Ratings
Automated backups9.425 Ratings
Database security provisions9.224 Ratings
Monitoring and metrics8.725 Ratings
Automatic host deployment9.123 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Aurora
Small Businesses
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Enterprises

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Aurora
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(44 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(4 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
9.6
(24 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(5 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Aurora
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Amazon Aurora is very well suited in situations where the application requires high scalability and has variable and unpredictable workloads. Also, real-time analysis and reporting could be performed easily using Aurora's read replica feature. Aurora might not be a good fit for applications that rely more on other cloud-based services such as Azure since there are some issues with regards to integrations
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • No need to provision storage nor IOPS for the disks
  • Automatics continuos backups with the possibility to point-in-time restore in new database or backtrack to a point in time in the same database
  • Increase availability by using Read Replicas and also distributing read capacity using them for queries
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Access to slow query, and error logs is a little cumbersome. Maybe, stream that to an AWS Elasticsearch, and provide searching out of the box (even if it means additional costs).
  • Upgrade to higher versions of MySQL is a problem.
  • Failovers to replica, although, they are not needed often, they can be made more seamless.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
We have an entire infrastructure around Amazon Aurora. We ara confident on our decision, as Amazon Aurora has been able to evolve as database solution, keeping up with the latest trends, and is very well integrated on all the AWS environment. Furthermore, we use lots of services from AWS, and it's important that they all can be easily connected to improve each individual contribution.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Aurora is easy to deploy and operate from the AWS console, the command line, and with Infrastructure as Code tools like Cloudformation and Terraform. Integrating the endpoints into an application is easy because from the outside, the Aurora clusters look just like any other open source database. I have also seen benefit from using the instances within the cluster as distinct read and write endpoints allowing for further customization in our applications.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Amazon AWS
This is a cost effective software for large data handlers who find difficulty in placing their data in a confidential manner, this provides almost everything which one needs for powerful data handling softwares , even though I find it lacking in somewhat interactiveness but yet this is worth effective and efficient for working and relating datas in several tuples.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
The support as a whole cannot be applied to just Aurora, but I must say that the response to our tickets from the AWS side was a bit anemic. Despite that, there is plenty of documentation and forum articles that should make anybody self-serviced. Again, let me stress this out - the product (in either MySQL or Postgres form) was used by many people and thus now well understood, explained and there are plenty of books and other material available. This is not the case that we encountered with NoSQL.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
  • Performance and Scalability: If an organization requires high performance and the ability to scale seamlessly to handle varying workloads, Amazon Aurora's architecture is well-suited for these needs.
  • High Availability: Organizations that prioritize uptime and require automatic failover in case of AZ failures can benefit from Aurora's multi-AZ deployments.
  • Ease of Management: AWS's managed service approach reduces administrative burden, allowing organizations to focus on their applications rather than database maintenance.
  • Security and Compliance: Aurora's security features make it appealing to organizations that deal with sensitive data or are subject to compliance regulations.
  • Compatibility: Organizations already using MySQL or PostgreSQL may find it easier to migrate to Aurora while maintaining familiarity with the database engine.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • After migrating to Amazon Aurora, our speed of the query, database availability, and security has increased a lot from before.
  • It has an inbuilt autodetection and correction mechanism for locks in the database, which is a great asset for any team. It also enhances our database schema if it not properly structured.
  • If your requirements are not clear at the moment, but you know based on the project that it is going to be a big database, then you should go with Amazon Aurora as you can scale and descale based on your needs.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Amazon Aurora Screenshots

Screenshot of A look inside the RDS console.