TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Datastore vs. Redis Software

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon DynamoDB

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AAmazon DynamoDB is a cloud-native, NoSQL, serverless database service.

    $0

    capacity unit per hour

    Google Cloud Datastore

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL "schemaless" database as a service, supporting diverse data types. The database is managed; Google manages sharding and replication and prices according to storage and activity.N/A

    Redis Software

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ARedis is an open source in-memory data structure server and NoSQL database.N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon DynamoDBGoogle Cloud DatastoreRedis Software
    Editions & Modules
    Provisioned - Read Operation
    $0.00013
    capacity unit per hour
    Provisioned - Write Operation
    $0.00065
    capacity unit per hour
    Provisioned - Global Tables
    $0.000975
    per Read Capacity
    On-Demand Streams
    $0.02
    per 100,000 read operations
    Provisioned - Streams
    $0.02
    per 100,000 read operations
    On-Demand Data Requests Outside AWS Regions
    $0.09
    per GB
    Provisioned - Data Requests Outside AWS Regions
    $0.09
    per GB
    On-Demand Snapshot
    $0.10
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Snapshot
    $0.10
    per GB per month
    On-Demand Restoring a Backup
    $0.15
    per GB
    Provisioned - Restoring a Backup
    $0.15
    per GB
    On-Demand Point-in-Time Recovery
    $0.20
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Point-in-Time Recovery
    $0.20
    per GB per month
    On-Demand Read Operation
    $0.25
    per million requests
    On-Demand Data Stored
    $0.25
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Data Stored
    $0.25
    per GB per month
    On-Demand - Write Operation
    $1.25
    per million requests
    On-Demand Global Tables
    $1.875
    per million write operations replicated
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon DynamoDBGoogle Cloud DatastoreRedis Software
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon DynamoDBGoogle Cloud DatastoreRedis Software
    Considered Multiple Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    MongoDB vs. Amazon DynamoDB:• MongoDB requires more human management than DynamoDB, which is a fully managed service.• DynamoDB's scalability is automatic, whereas MongoDB's horizontal scaling may require more work.• When compared to DynamoDB, MongoDB offers more extensive data …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    Performance, Scalability, durability , fully managed
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    MongoDB is mostly document store while Amazon DynamoDB supports both key/value and document store making it more versatile. Azure Cosmos DB is multi-modal like Amazon DynamoDB and it makes more sense when you have data already in Azure Cloud. If you are mostly using AWS then …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    We started using DynamoDB because of the AWS ecosystem; it integrates well with everything. The IAM for role management as well. But using MongoDB with other AWS products was not seamless; we had to create custom APIs to make it work. But if the need for your organization is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    We have been preferring DynamoDB over Redis for persistent data. It has a better encryption model and is operationally simpler. For materialized views we've been using Elasticsearch, but are starting to consider using DynamoDB there too.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    We use all of them in different scenarios. The reason we use DynamoDb is that we have already implemented AWS Services in our production environment. Deploying DynamoDB service is relatively easier than others. Therefore, we choose to use DynamoDB. it also brings great benefits …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    I've used SQL and NoSQL solutions, such as MongoDB and MySQL. I would not choose Dynamo to be a primary datastore and one of the others is likely a better option. Dynamo is good as almost viewed as a large cache. If you want something that is more supported and easier to work …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    DynamoDB is a natural fit for anyone using the AWS environment for their code. If we were using Google or not tied to anything then Firebase might have been a better choice as it supports pub / sub among other things. It doesn't really act as a cache like redis does, but it can …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    As a fully managed NoSQL service, DynamoDB provides a lot of functionality for relatively low cost. Scaling, sharding, throughput performance is managed for you, and you only pay for the bandwidth you provision.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    9/10 times I would recommend using MongoDB over DynamoDB. The only real benefit of DynamoDB over MongoDB is that it's already deeply nested in the Amazon ecosystem with tight integration with other AWS tools. Working with Amazons sdks is clunky compared to Mongo, it lacks a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    Sql is much more feature rich yet costly and harder to maintain. Requires physical servers while dynamo everything is in the cloud across multiple AZs. Redis is actually great to put on top of dynamo to use as a read cache which is much faster and cheaper, but the storage and …
    Incentivized
    Google
    Chose Google Cloud Datastore
    We selected Google Cloud Datastore as one of our candidates for our NoSQL data is because it is provided by Google Cloud, which fits our needs. Most of our infrastructure is on Google Cloud, so when we think about the NoSQL database, the first thing we thought about is Google …
    Incentivized
    Redis
    Chose Redis Software
    We divide projects between Redis and Elasticsearch Service. In some parts or modules one of these two databases fit better than the other.
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    DynamoDB is a fully managed key-value store by Amazon. It provides more powerful indexing to the tables, which certainly increases the performance if searching is what you need. However, it is also a lot more expensive to use compared to Redis. If your use case is more on the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    We evaluated Oracle and at first it seems competitive but after the contract term pricing would jump. Heard this from business associates and online communities
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    It's cheaper than Microsoft Azure offerings.
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    We prefer DynamoDB whenever possible. We have more predictable performance at the tail end, better isolation and cheaper costs per GB of storage.
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    We use Redis because our engineer's tech team know how to use it.
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    Redshift has relatively high latency and thus produces unscalable solution.
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    NCache, MemcacheD
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    Faster response time. Overall cleaner API.
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    Redis was our first and last choice.
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    Couchbase doesn't keep up with what they offer and what really does.
    MongoDB just doesn't scale out, reads are performed across multiple nodes but writes still go to the single master.
    DynamoDB is good overall but just way too expensive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Redis Software
    Redis is had higher performance at a cheaper cost than any of these alternatives. The downside is the data is not as durable as these alternatives. Redis is like SQL where you pay of the instance running 24/7 where dynamo and s3 you pay per usage. Redis schema most closely …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    47 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    44 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    46 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    39 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    40 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    Amazon DynamoDBGoogle Cloud DatastoreRedis Software
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Datastore and Redis Software
    Feature
    Amazon DynamoDB
    9.2
    69 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Google Cloud Datastore
    8.4
    3 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Redis Software
    -
    Ratings
    Performance9.368 Ratings10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability9.569 Ratings7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency9.067 Ratings9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security9.269 Ratings9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability9.468 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility8.266 Ratings4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility10.023 Ratings9.92 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon DynamoDBGoogle Cloud DatastoreRedis Software
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon DynamoDBGoogle Cloud DatastoreRedis Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (79 ratings)
    6.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (76 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (34 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.7
    (12 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (42 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.2
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (42 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon DynamoDBGoogle Cloud DatastoreRedis Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    It’s great for server less and real-time applications. It would be great for gaming and mobile apps. However, if you need relational database and have fixed budget, do not use it. While budget can be managed, you need to be careful. Also this is not a tool for storing big data, there are other wide-column database types you could use for it ins the ad
    Read full review
    Google
    I feel like Google Cloud Datastore is well suited when the data models are simple and the possible filtering and sorting operation are not complex. With more complex filtering, the amount of required indexes increase, and so does the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Redis
    Redis has been a great investment for our organization as we needed a solution for high speed data caching. The ramp up and integration was quite easy. Redis handles automatic failover internally, so no crashes provides high availability. On the fly scaling scale to more/less cores and memory as and when needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • To manage varying workloads, it enables users to increase capacity as necessary and decrease it as needed.
    • Users can take advantage of its auto-scaling, in-memory caching, and backup without paying for the services of a database administrator.
    • We can use it for low scale operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • It is hosted in GCP, our primary cloud provider.
    • It integrates with all the services we use in GCP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Redis
    • Easy for developers to understand. Unlike Riak, which I've used in the past, it's fast without having to worry about eventual consistency.
    • Reliable. With a proper multi-node configuration, it can handle failover instantly.
    • Configurable. We primarily still use Memcache for caching but one of the teams uses Redis for both long-term storage and temporary expiry keys without taking on another external dependency.
    • Fast. We process tens of thousands of RPS and it doesn't skip a beat.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Cost model may not be easy to control and may lead to higher costs if not carefully planned
    • Indexing may be a cost culprit when not planned, because it's not included on the data costs
    • The Query Language may not fulfill everybody's expectations, as it has less features than those of competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Part of the Google Cloud Platform walled garden.
    • Pay for read/writes to the datastore, in addition to storage.
    • Not many libraries exist.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Redis
    • We had some difficulty scaling Redis without it becoming prohibitively expensive.
    • Redis has very simple search capabilities, which means its not suitable for all use cases.
    • Redis doesn't have good native support for storing data in object form and many libraries built over it return data as a string, meaning you need build your own serialization layer over it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    It's core to our business, we couldn't survive without it. We use it to drive everything from FTP logins to processing stories and delivering them to clients. It's reliable and easy to query from all of our pipeline services. Integration with things like AWS Lambda makes it easy to trigger events and run code whenever something changes in the database.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    I give Google Cloud a full score because it satisfies our needs so well. We host most of our infrastructure on Google Cloud and using Google Cloud Datastore helps us to solve our NoSQL storage problem. and Google Cloud Datastore is so scalable and elastic. It saves us lots of time to maintain and saves us money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Redis
    We will definitely continue using Redis because: 1. It is free and open source. 2. We already use it in so many applications, it will be hard for us to let go. 3. There isn't another competitive product that we know of that gives a better performance. 4. We never had any major issues with Redis, so no point turning our backs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Functionally, DynamoDB has the features needed to use it. The interface is not as easy to use, which impacts its usability. Being familiar with AWS in general is helpful in understanding the interface, however it would be better if the interface more closely aligned with traditional tools for managing datastores.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    The simple implementation, together with the Google Cloud dashboard that allows data inspection, editing and querying, makes Google Cloud Datastore a comprehensive choice when it comes to NoSQL databases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Redis
    It is quite simple to set up for the purpose of managing user sessions in the backend. It can be easily integrated with other products or technologies, such as Spring in Java. If you need to actually display the data stored in Redis in your application this is a bit difficult to understand initially but is possible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Amazon AWS
    It works very well across all the regions and response time is also very quick due to AWS's internal data transfer. Plus if your product requires HIPPA or some other regulations needs to be followed, you can easily replicate the DB into multiple regions and they manage all by it's own.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Redis
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    I have not had to contact support for this service, however I have had to contact AWS for other services and their support has been good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Redis
    The support team has always been excellent in handling our mostly questions, rarely problems. They are responsive, find the solution and get us moving forward again. I have never had to escalate a case with them. They have always solved our problems in a very timely manner. I highly commend the support team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Redis
    Whitelisting of the AWS lambda functions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    The only thing that can be compared to DynamoDB from the selected services can be Aurora. It is just that we use Aurora for High-Performance requirements as it can be 6 times faster than normal RDS DB. Both of them have served as well in the required scenario and we are very happy with most of the AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    If deploying an application in Google Cloud Platform, using Google Cloud Datastore is a no brainer because of the simplicity of setup. Other options would require more setup and configuration, and do not come with the same level of guaranteed uptime as Google Cloud Datastore. In our case, we've been using Google Cloud Datastore for 4 years without any issues and have never had to think about it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Redis
    We are big users of MySQL and PostgreSQL. We were looking at replacing our aging web page caching technology and found that we could do it in SQL, but there was a NoSQL movement happening at the time. We dabbled a bit in the NoSQL scene just to get an idea of what it was about and whether it was for us. We tried a bunch, but I can only seem to remember Mongo and Couch. Mongo had big issues early on that drove us to Redis and we couldn't quite figure out how to deploy couch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Amazon AWS
    I have taken one point away due to its size limits. In case the application requires queries, it becomes really complicated to read and write data. When it comes to extremely large data sets such as the case in my company, a third-party logistics company, where huge amount of data is generated on a daily basis, even though the scalability is good, it becomes difficult to manage all the data due to limits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Redis
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Some developers see DynamoDB and try to fit problems to it, instead of picking the best solution for a given problem. This is true of any newer tool that people are trying to adopt.
    • It has allowed us to add more scalability to some of our systems.
    • As with any new technology there was a ramp up/rework phase as we learned best practices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • It solves our NoSQL database problem.
    • It it highly scalable and available to meets our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Redis
    • Redis has helped us increase our throughput and server data to a growing amount of traffic while keeping our app fast. We couldn't have grown without the ability to easily cache data that Redis provides.
    • Redis has helped us decrease the load on our database. By being able to scale up and cache important data, we reduce the load on our database reducing costs and infra issues.
    • Running a Redis node on something like AWS can be costly, but it is often a requirement for scaling a company. If you need data quickly and your business is already a positive ROI, Redis is worth the investment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Amazon DynamoDB Screenshots

    Screenshot of Amazon DynamoDB in the AWS Console

    Redis Software Screenshots

    Screenshot of Database configurationScreenshot of Database metricsScreenshot of DatabasesScreenshot of NodesScreenshot of Alerts