Amazon Web Services vs. IBM Power Virtual Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Web Services
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a subsidiary of Amazon that provides on-demand cloud computing services. With over 165 services offered, AWS services can provide users with a comprehensive suite of infrastructure and computing building blocks and tools.
$100
per month
IBM Power Virtual Server
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM presents their Power Systems Virtual Server as a scalable, cost-effective way to run IBM AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads​.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Web ServicesIBM Power Virtual Server
Editions & Modules
Free Tier
$0
per month
Basic Environment
$100 - $200
per month
Intermediate Environment
$250 - $600
per month
Advanced Environment
$600-$2500
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Web ServicesIBM Power Virtual Server
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsAWS allows a “save when you commit” option that offers lower prices when you sign up for a 1- or 3- year term that includes an AWS service or category of services.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Web ServicesIBM Power Virtual Server
Considered Both Products
Amazon Web Services

No answer on this topic

IBM Power Virtual Server
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
At [first,] my team was working with Amazon Web Services and later we changed to IBM. I can say IBM suits best with our work requirements as it has all the features AWS has and also with new features included. one of the best this is its price which can be affordable by both …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
Amazon Web Services is slightly less in cost However this fact is far out shadowed by the superior customization and efficiency of the IBM Power system Virtual Server. IBM also provides far superior customer service.
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
Our team had evaluated IBM cloud along with Azure, AWS, GCP and Alibaba cloud providers based on our previous experience and we were stunned after only couple of months of usage with the IBM Power Virtual servers for its value for money as well as robust performance and the …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
They both have their own ups and downs and it totally depends on the team which suits them best. IBM Power Virtual Server has Performance, Scalability, Reliability and Availability, Compatibility, and Good Vendor Support. The specific use case and workload requirements played a …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
IBM Power System components are more reliable and have longer uptimes than those of competing systems. The IBM Power System Virtual Server setup and configuration process was simple. To now, no errors have been made in terms of placing an unreasonable burden on the server, …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
IBM POWER SYSTEM VIRTUAL SERVER is best no comparison with others. The system is trust worthy best in industry.
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
We don't have any comparison with IBM's excellent playing quality with proper security as Compared to other virtual servers. Overall IBM POWER SYSTEM VIRTUAL SERVER is the best.
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
Allows us to rapidly supply new workloads. Allows certain groups to have more control over their own resources. Enables the use of a single infrastructure to support numerous operating systems. When it comes to data copy, IBM Power Systems Virtual Server helps us out.
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
Despite the fact that we have utilized AWS and other solutions, IBM Power System virtual servers have provided superior outcomes for our customers. When it comes to heavy workload operation, IBM Power servers are well-suited for delivering the greatest performance. It allows …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
It is more effective and efficient at doing activities, and it is capable of functioning independently. Manual engagement is required due to the fact that it is extremely likely. It takes only a few minutes to be back up and running. Because of its quickness, it is normally …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
First and foremost, I believe that IBM Power System Virtual Server is significantly less expensive than Microsoft Azure, making it more affordable for small and medium-sized businesses. The IBM Cloud provides the finest load balancing, continuous performance, and network …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
This is due to the accuracy, efficiency, and speed with which it operates. It has been extremely beneficial to our organization, allowing us to complete a limited number of jobs in a shorter amount of time. It has always been our first pick since it is the greatest. It is the …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
When compared to the IBM Power System Virtual Server, Microsoft Azure is a little more costly. Because of its working abilities, IBM is a formidable rival in the software industry. It has the capability of supporting a wide range of operating-system configurations. In terms of …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
We'd previously utilized AWS, but because we have members of our team who are already familiar with IBM, we believe it's the ideal fit for our needs. IBM's pricing strategy is also ideal for us in comparison to AWS.
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
Installation of IBM Power System Virtual Server was simple. Because of the simplicity of scaling, no mistakes have been made in terms of overloading the server. When we switched from on-premises solutions to IBM Power System Virtual Server, we had 99.9% uptime and no …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
It's more versatile and dependable. It's up to my team to handle it any way they see fit. Quick and simple to operate. The customer service provided by the company's technical department is excellent. My intention is to keep using it. A government customer is using IBM Power
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
IBM Power System Virtual Server is cheaper than other cloud platforms. IBM is more suited to heavy computational workloads, and Amazon EC2 does not offer the same cost effectiveness. Amazon EC2 is often cheaper and offers better coverage around the world. It also has a wider …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
We use IBM Power System Virtual Server because other services are too expensive and we only need a server that is affordable with scalability. This one was a good choice for us as it provides efficiency in our day-to-day tasks and cloud software.
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
IBM Power System Virtual Server allows you to use powerful AI. IBM Systems are well designed to run any kind of application. It helps to use a single platform to avoid unnecessary activities and actions to maintain. It is going to be the one as competitive for all the virtual …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
We have been using many other systems in our projects like Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Microsoft Windows, etc. If someone is looking for a better stable environment with high system performance and better security updates and features, then I always prefer the IBM Power System …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
Firstly I can say IBM Power System Virtual Server is much better with respect to cost when compared to Microsoft Azure which is good for small and medium scale industries to afford. IBM facilitates Load Balancing, continuous Performance, and Network Monitoring features which …
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
One of the best advantages of IBM Power System Virtual Server is its price model because Amazon web service is a bit costlier than IBM's power system. IBM offers better cloud storage which is similar to AWS. IBM Power System Virtual Server is best for handling workload when you …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Amazon Web ServicesIBM Power Virtual Server
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Web Services
8.9
67 Ratings
9% above category average
IBM Power Virtual Server
8.5
189 Ratings
5% above category average
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime8.863 Ratings8.8188 Ratings
Dynamic scaling9.164 Ratings8.4187 Ratings
Elastic load balancing9.360 Ratings8.4184 Ratings
Pre-configured templates7.956 Ratings8.0183 Ratings
Monitoring tools9.164 Ratings9.1186 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images8.457 Ratings8.6183 Ratings
Operating system support9.062 Ratings8.5186 Ratings
Security controls9.365 Ratings8.9185 Ratings
Automation9.116 Ratings8.1162 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Web ServicesIBM Power Virtual Server
Small Businesses
Linode
Linode
Score 9.0 out of 10
Linode
Linode
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Web ServicesIBM Power Virtual Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(79 ratings)
8.6
(189 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.4
(10 ratings)
9.6
(4 ratings)
Usability
7.2
(9 ratings)
2.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.2
(24 ratings)
8.1
(2 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(3 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Web ServicesIBM Power Virtual Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
We recommend AWS Lightsail with Plesk Ubuntu Web Admin (free) edition for launching WordPress websites. Pricing starts with 3.5$ per month and they are providing 3 months free. In order to access advanced features of Plesk, consider upgrading to paid Plesk plans that starts with 13.50$ per month (10 websites supported). Up to 40% discount is available for the first year. Anyway, even the free Plesk Web Admin version is by itself self sufficient with free SSL.
Read full review
IBM
Due to its reliability, it is well-suited for mission-critical applications. It is also well suited for running multiple applications on a single server and fully utilizing the server's full capacity. However, it is not well suited for servers that require dedicated IO resources.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Starting an instance and accessing it for testing purpose, demo or production deployment its always easy.
  • All the things which are available over AWS are pretty well managed and easy to use.
  • You might find everything you required for an product and other development over AWS.
  • Its suitable for both either an enterprise or an startup
  • Various resources and documentation are available in case you struck somewhere.
Read full review
IBM
  • It is easy to segregate test environment with production environment
  • security and compliance
  • IBM server are scalable with - with increase in data it can dynamically allocate the resources with saves the company cost
  • it is very convenient to use with help of its hardware management console and integrated virtualization manager.
  • The best part it , it support our legacy system.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • If there is one thing I think AWS needs improvement on, it is the administration dashboard. It can be a nightmare to use especially when trying to access billing. This could be made better, honestly, as there should be a simplified way to access simple admin features.
  • While AWS was fairly easy to integrate into our solutions, it is not as easy to use without some IT knowledge. The dashboards are complicated and designed for someone who is computer savvy. If you are just want to keep track of billing, for example, you may need to take a course or spend a few hours with someone being walked through the admin console.
  • AWS does tend to be slow at times. If you do not have a fast internet connection, it can take time to access services that are hosted on AWS. This is not always the case but we have had clients complain about this if they are trying to access a service from multiple points (IP addresses). The only real fix we found was to make our files cache to another server and only keep current data accessible to clients.
Read full review
IBM
  • Having a wider selection of software to work with would be welcome.
  • Training and education is daunting at first and could be simplified.
  • Much of the automation is wonderful after it is set up but getting started has a steep learning curve.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
We are almost entirely satisfied with the service. In order to move off it, we'd have to build for ourselves many of the services that AWS provides and the cost would be prohibitive. Although there are cost savings and security benefits to returning to the colo facility, we could never afford to do it, and we'd hate to give up the innovation and constant cycle of new features that AWS gives us.
Read full review
IBM
At the moment we are 100% satisfied with the performance and our support team is well used to the process involved. So unless we have some major issues in adopting, we are sure to be with IBM itself.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Our cloud platform architecture was designed in order to collect, analyze, and optimize modern networks, from AWS-powered computing, networking, storage, and more. So, we needed a reliable, scalable, and secure global computing infrastructure. Auto Scaling and Elastic Load Balancing were key features in our evaluation and later on for scalability and high performance. We being a cybersecurity company, we needed to ensure that our cloud provider utilizes an end-to-end approach to secure and harden the infrastructure, including physical, operational, and software measures - which AWS had all in place.
Read full review
IBM
Power Systems Virtual Server on IBM Cloud for IBMi's overall usability is good, but it can be difficult for new users, some learning is needed, but there are tonns of online documentation.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Amazon AWS
Availability is very good, with the exception of occasional spectacular outages.
Read full review
IBM
Very easy to use.
Read full review
Performance
Amazon AWS
AWS does not provide the raw performance that you can get by building your own custom infrastructure. However, it is often the case that the benefits of specialized, high-performance hardware do not necessarily outweigh the significant extra cost and risk. Performance as perceived by the user is very different from raw throughput.
Read full review
IBM
Easy to use.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
The customer support of Amazon Web Services are quick in their responses. I appreciate its entire team, which works amazingly, and provides professional support. AWS is a great tool, indeed, to provide customers a suitable way to
immediately search for their compatible software's and also to guide them in a
good direction. Moreover, this product is a good suggestion for every type of
company because of its affordability and ease of use.
Read full review
IBM
As with most IBM products the ongoing support for IBM Power Virtual Server is solid and consistent. IBM provides a clear roadmap for receiving support of their products. Both voice and online response is offered. It is obvious that IBM has the internal systems and culture to maintain support functions. This starts from the initial support call to the problem analysis and continues through the problem resolution. Documentation and communication are consistent within this process.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Amazon AWS
The API's were very well documented and was Janova's main point of entry into the services.
Read full review
IBM
It is economic.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Amazon Web Services is well suited when we have a huge amount of data to store, process, manipulate and get meaningful information out of. It is also suitable when we need very fast data retrieval from the database. They provide a superior product at a fair price which allows us to further our goals and push the limits of what we are capable of as a team / company.
Read full review
IBM
They both have their own ups and downs and it totally depends on the team which suits them best. IBM Power Virtual Server has Performance, Scalability, Reliability and Availability, Compatibility, and Good Vendor Support. The specific use case and workload requirements played a significant role. Some workloads may benefit from IBM Power Systems' architecture, while others may perform equally well on alternative platforms.
Read full review
Scalability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
It is efficient.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • AWS has lowered our employee cost, because you don't have to hire Network/Server Admins to manage infrastructure.
  • Increased productivity by incorporating Continuous Integration with AWS and our development life cycle.
  • Increased customer confidence by being able to provide HIPAA level security in our development and production environments
Read full review
IBM
  • We have had a return on investment of 30%.
  • There have also been 80% fewer application crashes due to a lack of resources that previously ran on the X86 platform.
  • Administration management has been simplified and staff can dedicate themselves to the development of applications, instead of providing support to users when the applications do not respond efficiently, this made staff 45% more productive.
Read full review
ScreenShots