AWS - still good
Overall Satisfaction with Amazon Web Services
We use AWS as a primary cloud provider across a range of services. That includes managed compute fleet, networking, covers some of the load balancing and multi region disaster recover scenarios, as well as some higher level things like managed Kubernetes, some databases, logging, analytics and many other elements across AWS offerings
Pros
- Reliability
- Comprehensive offerings
- Support that works
Cons
- Web console UI is sometimes inconsistent
- Some services have historical feature gaps that take time to get addressed
- Things can always be cheaper
- IF you plan and execute well, in many cases you can get very positive outcomes for buy vs build
- IF you are not careful and diligent, you can get very negative runaway costs - and it will be on *you*
- Always try to honestly think if you *need* to build on the cloud. Some things are possible to build and maintain on your own, cheaper AND better. But you need to be on top of all the aspects.
In my personal experience, AWS is superior to both GCP and Azure in the majority of usable applications. GCP suffers from the near total misunderstanding of how support system is even supposed to work, and while _some_ services are pretty nifty and well-polished, some are mindbogglingly designed black boxes with self-conflicting documentation. Some of it comes from having legacy systems, sure, but AWS somehow manages, even having a rather big lead start. Azure, from my limited experience, is limited to people somehow coerced into its usage by external constraints. That being said, IF you can design and implement something there, it will probably run fine.
Do you think Amazon Web Services delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Amazon Web Services's feature set?
Yes
Did Amazon Web Services live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Amazon Web Services go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Amazon Web Services again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation