AWS - still good
June 24, 2025

AWS - still good

Michael Bravo | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Amazon Web Services

We use AWS as a primary cloud provider across a range of services. That includes managed compute fleet, networking, covers some of the load balancing and multi region disaster recover scenarios, as well as some higher level things like managed Kubernetes, some databases, logging, analytics and many other elements across AWS offerings

Pros

  • Reliability
  • Comprehensive offerings
  • Support that works

Cons

  • Web console UI is sometimes inconsistent
  • Some services have historical feature gaps that take time to get addressed
  • Things can always be cheaper
  • IF you plan and execute well, in many cases you can get very positive outcomes for buy vs build
  • IF you are not careful and diligent, you can get very negative runaway costs - and it will be on *you*
  • Always try to honestly think if you *need* to build on the cloud. Some things are possible to build and maintain on your own, cheaper AND better. But you need to be on top of all the aspects.
I am generally very satisfied with AWS. It can be somewhat plodding, UI/UX in some places is behind the times or strangely inconsistent, very occasionally some services, usually some very new ones, require a bit of back and forth to get set up properly. But ultimately, it's an extremely reliable workhorse, and I can't overstate how important it is that they have an actual really working support system.
In my personal experience, AWS is superior to both GCP and Azure in the majority of usable applications. GCP suffers from the near total misunderstanding of how support system is even supposed to work, and while _some_ services are pretty nifty and well-polished, some are mindbogglingly designed black boxes with self-conflicting documentation. Some of it comes from having legacy systems, sure, but AWS somehow manages, even having a rather big lead start. Azure, from my limited experience, is limited to people somehow coerced into its usage by external constraints. That being said, IF you can design and implement something there, it will probably run fine.

Do you think Amazon Web Services delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Amazon Web Services's feature set?

Yes

Did Amazon Web Services live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Amazon Web Services go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Amazon Web Services again?

Yes

This is something that is actually common across most cloud providers. A comprehensive understanding of one's use cases, constraints and future directions is key to determining if you even need a cloud solution. If you are a 2-person startup developing something with a best-scenario audience of 1k DAU in a year, you would very likely best served by a dirt-cheap dedicated Linux server somewhere (and your options to graduate to a cloud solution will still be open). If, however, you are a bigger fish, and/or you are actively considering build-vs-buy decisions for complicated, highly-loaded, six-figure requests per minute systems, global loadbalancing, extreme growth projections - then MAYBE you solve all or part of it with a cloud provider. And depending on your taste for risk, reliability, flexibility, track record - it might be AWS.

Amazon Web Services Feature Ratings

Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime
10
Dynamic scaling
8
Elastic load balancing
10
Pre-configured templates
8
Monitoring tools
7
Pre-defined machine images
9
Operating system support
9
Security controls
10
Automation
8

Comments

More Reviews of Amazon Web Services