Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appian
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
IBM Datacap
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM® Datacap helps users streamline the capture, recognition and classification of business documents and extract important information. Datacap supports multiple-channel capture by processing paper documents on scanners, mobile devices, multi-function peripherals and fax. It uses natural language processing, text analytics and machine learning technologies, to automatically identify, classify and extract content from unstructured or variable documents. The software can reduce labor and paper…N/A
Tungsten Capture
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.
$3,500
per year
Pricing
AppianIBM DatacapTungsten Capture
Editions & Modules
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
No answers on this topic
Kofax Capture
$3,500
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppianIBM DatacapTungsten Capture
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppianIBM DatacapTungsten Capture
Considered Multiple Products
Appian
Chose Appian
As a matter of fact, I was not part of the selection process when Appian was selected for SADIE project. Appian was selected because of its quick application development capability. I heard - someone from the 3rd party development company mentioned - that anything can be built …
IBM Datacap
Chose IBM Datacap
It was cheaper with a better support package offered and no price per page scanned!
Tungsten Capture
Chose Tungsten Capture
Kofax Capture was less expensive than the IBM product and was easier to use than both IBM and Amazon in my opinion. The unlimited scripting of Kofax Capture allowed us to fully integrate the tool into our business processes to improve our automation and reduce errors. We …
Features
AppianIBM DatacapTungsten Capture
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Appian
8.1
9 Ratings
4% above category average
IBM Datacap
-
Ratings
Tungsten Capture
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.29 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.59 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports7.69 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Appian
7.4
9 Ratings
1% above category average
IBM Datacap
-
Ratings
Tungsten Capture
-
Ratings
Process designer7.99 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation6.49 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine6.49 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support8.29 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player7.39 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder7.69 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution8.59 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AppianIBM DatacapTungsten Capture
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Tungsten Power PDF
Tungsten Power PDF
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 10.0 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppianIBM DatacapTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(139 ratings)
9.5
(4 ratings)
9.2
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(19 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(95 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(118 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppianIBM DatacapTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
Appian
Appian works great for automating manual processes and integrating multiple systems through its toolset. It gives great flexibility for establishing rules for approvals, routings, escalations, and the like. Because of the low code toolset, it's very easy to deploy and make changes as needed as processes evolve and as the organization learns to utilize the system better. Minimal maintenance is required to support the applications build on the platform. Some of the automated testing integration with tools like Jenkins is limited so that may be an issue for some.
Read full review
IBM
Once highly customized, IBM Datacap can suit any business unit and scenario. To realize accurate knowledge and insight base on business documents, I would emphasize use of IBM Datacap since it has robust OCR tool that ease document capturing.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
Read full review
Pros
Appian
  • Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
  • Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
  • Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Read full review
IBM
  • Machine learning automates document processing from external applications and sources like scanners.
  • Exporting data with just a click to other content repositories.
  • Redaction of data based on requester role. Therefore, we are able to block irrelevant or sensitive information based on the specification of users.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
  • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
  • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
  • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
Read full review
Cons
Appian
  • Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
  • Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
  • Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
Read full review
IBM
  • Supporting documentation is poor
  • UI is old fashioned
Read full review
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
  • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
  • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
  • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Appian
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
Read full review
Usability
Appian
Appian is a low code environment, because of this, a very good visual interface is required. Appian is providing a feature-rich dashboard [that] we can use for building the dashboards and other interfaces. Appian also provides patches and releases to enhance these features. A developer can start off development just by going through a basic course from the Appian learning community.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
It's good.
Read full review
Support Rating
Appian
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
Read full review
IBM
Generally they are very good and reactive to our requests. if we find an issue our error they are quick to add a fix to the next release if needs be.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
Haven't really used their support yet
Read full review
In-Person Training
Appian
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Appian
Very boring; hard to get through quickly, but rather effective in demonstrating the use of the platform.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Appian
It was really seamless. SaaS in the true definition of the word. We logged on and started using the product. Very easy.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Appian
Appian has enormously transformed and keeps on updating the product every quarter to meet the latest needs of the world with new innovations & technologies being integrated within the platform. What gives more pleasure than a product that keeps on continuous[ly] improv[ing]?
Read full review
IBM
It's easier to extract data from documents for analytics, unlike other similar platforms.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
Quality of data capture. Automatic data integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic image integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic invoice booking in Oracle and SAP ERP.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Appian
  • I believe it has negatively impacted our release dates. There may have been a misunderstanding as to the learning curve, even though it is "low code."
  • The look and feel of the applications created using Appian have uniformity and it's easier to have "reuse" between applications.
  • There is less developer control when it comes to features. I think this mainly has to do with the amount of plugins available. I would think there should be many more available plugins. But again, our use case is probably different than most others.
Read full review
IBM
  • We have protected and safeguarded business information by redacting documents to ensure that confidential data doesn’t reach to irrelevant business users or cyber attackers.
  • Business procedures automation has been enhanced by IBM Datacap as part of the Cloud pak, which eases workflow and decision management.
  • Being based on modern modular, IBM Datacap allows us to pay for what we use, thus no losses are encountered.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
  • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Appian Screenshots

Screenshot of Low-Code DevelopmentScreenshot of Business Process Management SuiteScreenshot of Dynamic Case ManagementScreenshot of Mobile App DevelopmentScreenshot of Appian RPA with Blue Prism