Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appian
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
Kissflow
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Kissflow is a low-code platform for custom application development tailored to business operations. Kissflow empowers process owners and IT developers to automate and build processes and applications for internal business operations.
$1,500
per month
UiPath Document Understanding
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
UiPath Document Understanding is an intelligent document processing software solution that trains RPA robots to understand and process a company's forms.N/A
Pricing
AppianKissflowUiPath Document Understanding
Editions & Modules
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
Small Business
$1500
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppianKissflowUiPath Document Understanding
Free Trial
YesYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppianKissflowUiPath Document Understanding
Considered Multiple Products
Appian
Chose Appian
I am a user of Appian, where we have a data connector application built in Appian that is integrated with various systems, and provide a summary in Appian UI. We as a user can initiate new requests to extract, Transform and Load data on a specific or selected system with just …
Chose Appian
There are a lot of reasons to select Appian the first is low code. We can create various interactive data connectors applications also it is best in terms of security with an interactive user interface which makes it unique from the other platforms.
Chose Appian
Appian's pricing model and co-selling is more interesting than that of Power platform. We used Appian because of its better case management and the learning curve is also not that huge. Power platform says it is Low code no code but it still requires certain some coding …
Chose Appian
Camunda is a powerful solution like Appian, however, it is somewhat difficult from the technical side, that is why I do preferer Appian instead.
Chose Appian
Appian compares favorably with other vendors in the space. It is strongest with business workflow automation and to create custom business applications. The tool base for coding is extremely straightforward and allows for faster coding and deployment. Handles very complex …
Chose Appian
We using this from long time. We're quite familiar with them. it's easy to use and understand. and it's documentation is quite helpful.
Chose Appian
much easier to navigate and design-centric.
Chose Appian
Have not used many BPM tools but we are using RPA to automate many technologies and business processes. We are also using Servicenow for incidents and change management.
Chose Appian
ease of use; inter-operability and scalability; great support and customer service
Chose Appian
Java is much more customizable but it is also a lot more work developing apps and setting up infrastructure. Appian is much easier to learn and code in. Also, apps are able to be built much quicker. This helps when time and money are an issue.
Chose Appian
We selected Appian against Kissflow for its maturity in end-to-end process automation for all kinds of industries.
Chose Appian
In the BPM space, there are a few areas that IBM BPM gives the flexibility to integrate different systems. Whereas in Cloud space [through] Appian has picked up, there are lot of features that Salesforce provide can be put in Appian
Chose Appian
It has reduced our time to market because of the feedback we got early on. The smooth movements and easy flow create a vast difference. The team gets ample time to innovate and increase performance. Tasks are well performed in sprints and ready to release with fewer errors and …
Chose Appian
I personally think Appian will win the discussion of pricing between itself and Microsoft Power Automate currently, but since I don't feel as though the average person would be able to learn how to automate processes on Appian, I have to give the nod to Microsoft Power Automate …
Chose Appian
To be honest, I have not used any other software that is similar to Appian. I am used to just using raw code when it comes to creating an application. I find Appian very useful to use in this fast-paced industry, and when the client wishes to see the iteration of the project. …
Chose Appian
I am not involved in evaluating different products. We have a specific team that is tasked with the responsibility of evaluating various products and choosing the one that is most appropriate for the organization. My team and I are the users of the products. Appian was the best …
Chose Appian
We used custom BPM solutions in the past and find greater value in using Appian. I was not a part of the architecture team that reviewed other BPM solutions when Appian was selected.
Chose Appian
Appian has a lesser learning curve than Pega. Pega uses a combination of directed and pattern inheritance and architects need to design bearing these in mind. While the intent behind this approach is to allow for reuse of rules to allow for efficient enterprise-wide design, …
Chose Appian
Appian is the only product I have used that is anything like low-code.
Chose Appian
I did not get chance to work on the other BPM tools but I am pretty sure that Appian will outstrip others in terms of Process Designing and Management, Scalability, Security, Performance and ease of use.
Chose Appian
The main product that my company uses is Microsoft Teams. I think that Appian is far superior to Microsoft Teams in many aspects but the most significant is the ability to use easily and move from reports to reports. I far prefer Appian to Teams. The design is much better and …
Chose Appian
Appian surpasses Microsoft PowerApps because of how much easier it is to code. I found Appian easier to code than the competitor because of how you could access the code behind the scene (SAIL). This allowed for even greater customization and helps with debugging when you have …
Kissflow
Chose Kissflow
Kissflow is less expensive, and it is still a great option.
Chose Kissflow
Stitch Labs was way better with easy of setting up and editing. However the system could handle large amounts of data and syncing it with other systems was a nightmare. Netsuite ERP and Sage Intacct are full robust systems that when setup properly can handle any volume and has …
Chose Kissflow
Kissflow [School Cloud] is much much much less expensive for the same type of work completion that we needed.
Chose Kissflow
I like Asana because it's free to use. While it's well suited for simple task management, it doesn't work well if you need a more formalized approval process or if you need to maintain an ongoing dialogue about the task. With a previous organization I utilized KACE, which I …
Chose Kissflow
The process mapping allowed by KiSSFLOW, combined with automatic task assignments by email, made Kissflow the winner for task management. We still use Basecamp for other project management.
Chose Kissflow
KiSSFLOW wants you to be able to increase productivity, make it possible to "manage the chaos" (their own words) and simply make things better. It is exactly what it sounds like. For a visual learner, KiSSFLOW is perfect. It really does make good on its promise to help you …
Chose Kissflow
To be honest, I have not used any other products to automate business processes.
Chose Kissflow
I've received a wealth of support and interaction from KiSSFLOW right off the bat. As soon as we reached out for a demo, KiSSFLOW was communicative above and beyond what I ever got from ProcessMaker. They gladly extended my KiSSFLOW demo for another week so I could test …
Chose Kissflow
KiSSFLOW has been by far been the best tool.
Chose Kissflow
KiSSFLOW is much easier to set up, less coding and easier to explain to those that are being trained. The company already had SharePoint, but it is a very difficult system to set up. A class had to be taken, along with getting books in order to understand the process of the …
Chose Kissflow
There is not a whole lot to write here. I can simply say that KiSSLFLOW is a great process management tool that can be used very easily used. Here at our organization we use JIRA\, Atlassian, Office365, however these tools are used in a different capacity. KiSSLFOW has been …
Chose Kissflow
Because it's online and has integration with Google Apps - and also has a app. It doesn´t work that good (it's quite slow).
UiPath Document Understanding
Chose UiPath Document Understanding
UiPath document understanding makes my work easier. My business requirement was to identify invoice page numbers from a PDF containing more than 2 pages. And DU makes my work easier. Especially if there are thousands of documents, DU works better for that.
Chose UiPath Document Understanding
Accuracy and ExtractionCapabilitiesUtilizes machine learning algorithms for adaptive learning.Well-suited for structured and semi-structured document extraction.Offers a high degree of accuracy in data extraction.Employs cognitive learning and natural language processing (NLP) …
Chose UiPath Document Understanding
Most important is Cost required towards licensing.

Uipath Document Understanding can be easily learned with no special training required
Features
AppianKissflowUiPath Document Understanding
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Appian
8.1
Ratings
4% above category average
Kissflow
-
Ratings
UiPath Document Understanding
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports7.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Appian
7.4
Ratings
1% above category average
Kissflow
-
Ratings
UiPath Document Understanding
-
Ratings
Process designer7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation6.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine6.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support8.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player7.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder7.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution8.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
Kissflow
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
UiPath Document Understanding
-
Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AppianKissflowUiPath Document Understanding
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppianKissflowUiPath Document Understanding
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppianKissflowUiPath Document Understanding
Likelihood to Recommend
Appian is well suited for the areas which involve a workflow. For Example: Consider there is a task and 3 teams are required to work on the task, with Appian we can create tasks for each team and monitor the comments and completion. Together with the integration capabilities, this tool can function in many areas. In our firm, we are using it to automate the workflows for our business teams and help them in capturing the OLA's and SLA's.
Read full review
KiSSFLOW is well suited for any information heavy paperwork that multiple people approve and have access to complete work. It is less suited for processes that require a lot of back and forth with a form initiator. The workflows like to be very linear without much back tracking. It can do that but it prefers to be forward linear.
Read full review
UiPath Document Understanding excels in scenarios where invoices follow a standardized format or template. Its ability to accurately extract data from consistent layouts ensures reliable automation for invoices with predictable structures.When dealing with a large volume of invoices, Document Understanding's automation capabilities shine. It streamlines the extraction process, allowing organizations to efficiently process a high number of invoices with reduced manual intervention.Document Understanding is particularly suitable for organizations that utilize SAP or other Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. Its seamless integration capabilities facilitate the automatic transfer of accurately extracted invoice data into these systems.In scenarios where invoices have a combination of structured and semi-structured elements, Document Understanding performs well. It can intelligently handle varying layouts, making it suitable for invoices with standardized sections and flexible content placement.Similar to invoices, Document Understanding can be effectively used for extracting data from receipts. Whether it's capturing transaction details, merchant information, or purchase amounts, the tool's template-based extraction is advantageous.Document Understanding can be employed for automating the extraction of data from various HR documents, including resumes, employee onboarding forms, and timesheets. This facilitates efficient HR document management.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
  • Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
  • Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Read full review
  • I appreciate the automatic email notifications when it is your turn to complete a task. This keeps everyone on track.
  • I appreciate being able to "reassign" a task as well--leaving flexibility for some folks to cover for others when needed.
  • I appreciate the personal check-ins from our rep, asking how things are going. That makes me feel like someone is paying attention and wants me to be happy with the product.
Read full review
  • Easy to integrate into larger automation flows
  • Production-ready; built-in logging, exception handling and retry mechanisms
  • Common architecture for both Attended and Unattended (+ Action Center) implementations
  • Meant to make development, deployment, debugging and scaling much easier.
Read full review
Cons
  • Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
  • Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
  • Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
Read full review
  • Learning. If you are coming from a 100% paper process and have employees who know nothing more, then there is definitely a learning curve. You will need to bring someone in to help you train employees on the core concept of the change (the "Why are we doing this" questions). KiSSFLOW does have support, but this is more getting down to the details in your own work environment.
  • Visual learners will love it, but not non-visual. If you are an accountant, and your brain works like an accountant, then this program will be difficult to learn. It is very visual, and I have seen more success with visual learners than any others.
  • Bugs. A few years ago, there were a lot of bugs. There are not that many anymore. This is to be expected with any program, so if you are training an impatient staff who doesn't do well with error messages, you will want to be sure to pad the training sessions. I have not seen error messages in a long time; however, the nature of the beast is that you won't see one until you actually find one...
Read full review
  • data extraction phase could be a bit easier.
  • create a output variable to store classification result for accuracy(ie, eg: 80% )
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
Read full review
Really love the product. Was pleasantly surprised that it has been easy to use for parents
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
There are many differences between using Appian and using other programming languages. Additionally, there are many trade offs that have to be made and that have to be accepted for using Appian. In some cases, you give up control of one small area, but in others, it may open settings that are unavailable to a developer when using other program languages.
Read full review
The system has room to grow as it's limited by not being able to edit POs after they've been approved. The system is great for registrations and syncing to other systems while including the attachments. The reporting from Kissflow is also easy to setup to link to other platforms such as Looker
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
Read full review
I haven't encountered a need for support with KiSSFLOW. It's not a perfect platform, but it's functional, dependable, and reasonably intuitive. I can't fault a support team just because their product works!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Very boring; hard to get through quickly, but rather effective in demonstrating the use of the platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It was really seamless. SaaS in the true definition of the word. We logged on and started using the product. Very easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Appian compares favorably with other vendors in the space. It is strongest with business workflow automation and to create custom business applications. The tool base for coding is extremely straightforward and allows for faster coding and deployment. Handles very complex process flows and has the ability to discover new opportunities for automation.
Read full review
KiSSFLOW wants you to be able to increase productivity, make it possible to "manage the chaos" (their own words) and simply make things better. It is exactly what it sounds like. For a visual learner, KiSSFLOW is perfect. It really does make good on its promise to help you manage the chaos, and it makes it easy for your employees to understand how your business works. More specifically, I recommended this program for a small school that had never automated anything. They knew nothing about the process. Bringing in KiSSFLOW allowed them to not only refine their process, but it gave awareness to other employees and ensure that they could work as a team, knowing the intricacies of how each department works (so, the Director would understand the many steps of Admissions before taking over after enrollment -- they would know what each family experienced).
Read full review
UiPath document understanding makes my work easier. My business requirement was to identify invoice page numbers from a PDF containing more than 2 pages. And DU makes my work easier. Especially if there are thousands of documents, DU works better for that.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our IT automated procurement process has sped up time to get paid by a few days on every transaction
  • Our approvals are more organized as a result of being put in digitally
  • Managing our own tenant requires more than we have available, given the quarterly updates
  • Since we have business-critical functions running in the platform, we have to thoroughly review every note of every update. Because of this we skip half of the updates since we don't have enough time to review these changes four times a year.
Read full review
  • Somewhat expensive compared to other cheap (or free) task management alternatives. ROI depends on your specific needs and the size of your organization.
  • ROI can be ambiguous since KiSSFLOW is primarily for internal company use. A simple email thread could accomplish many of the same things, but with less efficiency.
Read full review
  • More accurate results
  • Saved almost 2-3 Hours of Manual work on daily basis
  • High volume of Document processing
Read full review
ScreenShots

Appian Screenshots

Screenshot of Low-Code DevelopmentScreenshot of Business Process Management SuiteScreenshot of Dynamic Case ManagementScreenshot of Mobile App DevelopmentScreenshot of Appian RPA with Blue Prism

Kissflow Screenshots

Screenshot of overall efficiency monitoringScreenshot of workflow trackingScreenshot of process metricsScreenshot of the drag and drop form builderScreenshot of a parallel branches workflowScreenshot of where to change file permissions