AppSheet vs. ProcessMaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AppSheet
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Acquired by Google in Spring 2020, AppSheet is an intelligent, no-code app platform for everyone. Users can create apps to transform the workplace. Common use cases include field service, transportation, customer surveys, incident reports, field data capture, compliance reports, delivery tracking, and property surveys. Used by the Fortune 500 & Industry Leaders Customers include Clearlink, Enterprise Holdings, ESPN, Pepsi, the University of Michigan, and the State of…
$5
per user/per month
ProcessMaker
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
Pricing
AppSheetProcessMaker
Editions & Modules
Premium
$5.00
per user/per month
Pro
$10.00
per user/per month
Business
Contact sales team
Enterprise
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppSheetProcessMaker
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPersonal apps and prototype are always free to build. Don't pay until you're ready to deploy. What can I do for free? Use the complete set of AppSheet features for free while building one or many app prototypes (for as long as you like). Invite up to 10 users for free to use your apps & share feedback. How do Business Subscription pricing work? Business Subscriptions enable a suite of performance & management features for organizations with cross-departmental app creators, and pricing is based on each unique requirements. Connect with the AppSheet team at solutions.appsheet.com/contact to learn more.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppSheetProcessMaker
Features
AppSheetProcessMaker
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
AppSheet
8.5
65 Ratings
1% above category average
ProcessMaker
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling7.559 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security10.061 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management8.560 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability8.062 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability8.057 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
AppSheet
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
7.8
3 Ratings
7% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings7.83 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
AppSheet
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
8.6
11 Ratings
10% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings8.911 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.911 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
AppSheet
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
8.9
10 Ratings
22% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings8.38 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings9.910 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings8.38 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
AppSheet
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
8.1
3 Ratings
16% above category average
Business Process Modeling00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Decision Modeling00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Code-Based Automation00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
No-Code Automation00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AppSheetProcessMaker
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppSheetProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(66 ratings)
8.9
(11 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.9
(6 ratings)
6.8
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppSheetProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
If you need to manage special assets with unique characteristics and keep data in spreadsheets, Appsheet is ideal for replacing these sheets with a system. Once you start using it, you find yourself trying to move everything into Appsheet. It is perfect for generating internal software that would otherwise never be developed due to programming costs.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Calculations - I have several apps that do some pretty complicated calculations, and decision making to build things like Shopping Lists for a Kanban assembly team, where the app will help a stocker determine whats low in a kanban assembly line stock box.
  • Document generation and record keeping - I have an app that users digitally sign and receive PDF contracts, and the system automatically records all records from the transaction. Everything is held in files on YOUR OWN DRIVE (Google Drive) so when you're done with the project or AppSheet you DONT loose your data.
  • Client/Customer Management - I follow the old school "Swimming with Sharks" model for client retention and customer engagement, and have built several small customer tracking tools for local businesses. This tool is limited ONLY by your imagine and desire to learn.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
  • The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
  • Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Once the tables / UX Views get way too many in number, it can become a little daunting to manage. This part of the UX may need something really smarter.
  • Ability to Undo.
  • Could provide more UI Look and Feel options. BTW, the new Graphs look great, but have some bugs, while the new INPUT() feature is a great addition too.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
We are still less than 10 users and probably may continue to be so. But, this being a franchisor set up, could be of use to other users like us.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google
It's just great. The usability is the best thing about Appsheet. You must choose which things will really be used later. You have to be careful of not generating something too big and then it feels like something that need to be learned. This is something that resolve problems, but you had to be able to think before doing. It will not solve problems itself. You need to find the problem, think a solution, and then use appsheet to make this solution a reality
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
AppSsheet has a support group and they show videos to help app builders. Though I have truck drivers' hours and can't join the webinars. Support groups with better assists me on a Saturday evening or a Sunday that I have time off. It's hard to watch videos driving down the highway.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Google
I did everything on my own
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
The ease that AppSheet provides to the developer is limitless. Before starting with AppSheet I used other software, but they didn't give me the tools at my fingertips.
When I learned about AppSheet and everything it could do, I understood that it was what I was looking for, the ease with which everything is related within the app with a few clicks is impressive.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • A good impact in general at the beginning since the free version allows great development so the investment in the implementation is of knowledge and time.
  • As a consultant I have expanded my services through this platform including new low code application building services.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
  • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
  • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
Read full review
ScreenShots

AppSheet Screenshots

Screenshot of Capture rich data through customizable mobile appsScreenshot of Deploy apps on any device.Screenshot of Track inventory from supplier to warehouse to customer.Screenshot of Enable sales and marketing on-the-go.