Assistant.to vs. Chili Piper

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Assistant.to
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Assistant.to is online scheduling software from the San Francisco based company of the same name.N/A
Chili Piper
Score 8.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Chili Piper is scheduling and routing software for B2B revenue teams. Its products help revenue teams increase their inbound conversion rates, increase customer satisfaction, and reach new levels of productivity. The vendor states Companies like Twilio, Forrester, Spotify, and Gong use Chili Piper with the goal of increasing their inbound conversion rates, eliminating manual lead routing, and streamlining critical processes around meetings. Chili Piper…
$15
per month per user
Pricing
Assistant.toChili Piper
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Instant Booker
$15
per month per user
Handoff
$25
per month per user
Concierge Inbound Scheduling
$30
per month per user
Distro
Starting at $20
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Assistant.toChili Piper
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOnboarding and Support are included at no additional charge.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Assistant.toChili Piper
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Assistant.toChili Piper
Small Businesses
vCita
vCita
Score 9.7 out of 10
vCita
vCita
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Chili Piper
Chili Piper
Score 8.8 out of 10
Calendly
Calendly
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Zoom
Zoom
Score 8.2 out of 10
Zoom
Zoom
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Assistant.toChili Piper
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(3 ratings)
9.6
(29 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
Assistant.toChili Piper
Likelihood to Recommend
Assistant.to
Assistant.to is well suited for anyone working with a large number of clients at once who need to schedule multiple meetings. If those clients do not have a background in online scheduling, then using this tool may not be the best solution. Assistant.to is a great tool for quickly scheduling meetings with options across 3 days, but for those wanting more flexibility you may want to consider Calendly.
Read full review
Chili Piper, Inc.
Chili Piper is GREAT for sales development teams booking for sales people. This is especially true when there is a "round robin" system that needs to be abided by. I've experienced a lot of bad round robin systems and Chili Piper's is fantastic. This is also a great tool to schedule with people across multiple time zones, which I don't want to have to focus on while speaking. It enables sales reps to focus on the prospect, not the time change. Chili piper would not be a good fit for underperforming sales teams that don't book any meetings (:
Read full review
Pros
Assistant.to
  • Schedule client meetings.
  • Schedule sales calls or demos.
  • Easy integration with Google Apps.
Read full review
Chili Piper, Inc.
  • Chili Piper integrates with Salesforce very well which I haven't seen other calendar apps do yet.
  • Meeting Buffer functionality assures that AEs won't be booked back-to back.
  • I can send the link to each of my meeting templates for different prospects
Read full review
Cons
Assistant.to
  • The app currently does not save the availability times that I select, therefore I have to re-select my availability every time I sent meeting options.
  • The app does not have the ability to customize the theme or styles of the meeting times. It'd be nice to allow users to choose between a set of themes to better fit their company's brand.
  • If Assistant.to had a scheduling link option like Calendly has, that would be another improvement. Sometimes we'll have customers who cannot meet until the following week, so having a scheduler link would be helpful in those situations.
Read full review
Chili Piper, Inc.
  • They are continually improving their offering and we've seen great leaps over the past 2 years.
  • Would be nice to be able to modify the email reminders for every single contact and event versus have set templates
  • Faster load times, but we can’t complain too much!
Read full review
Support Rating
Assistant.to
No answers on this topic
Chili Piper, Inc.
  • Support was very responsive during our integration phase, and after that too.
  • They have the whole infrastructure built to notify customers about bug/outages, which is excellent. Entire System outage only happened once, but being updated on fix progress helped a lot to keep our team calm.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Assistant.to
When I first started at my current company, I used this tool because it was what the rest of the team used. However, since I learned about Calendly, who recently released a feature similar to Assistant.to, I've actually switched to Calendly. Calendly also has the ability to create a scheduling link where someone can choose a time based on the parameters you set. This has proven to be more helpful for certain clients.
Read full review
Chili Piper, Inc.
Calendly was being used at the company by some other departments and still is to some extent. However adding Chili Piper fore the marketing and sales departments was a no brainer once we saw the demo. It's Calendly on steroids and the company is just getting started using it. I'm sure we will see even more benefits as the years go on.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Assistant.to
  • It has reduced our back and forth setting up appointments allowing sales to get more appointments faster.
  • Our client success team is able to quickly provide their available time.
  • Only real con is that the calendar is not real time and if a person clicks on a time that is not open, they don't find out until after they've gone to the site. But that is a limit of emails, not their tech.
Read full review
Chili Piper, Inc.
  • More demos held by simplifying the scheduling process. More demos = more opportunities
  • Initial set up was frustrating and created a lot of mix up which allowed some leads to slip through the cracks early
  • Integration with Salesforce.com saved our reps time because they didn't have to log activities manually
Read full review
ScreenShots