Atlassian Bamboo vs. Jenkins

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Atlassian Bamboo
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Australian company Atlassian offers Bamboo, a continuous integration server.
$1,200
Jenkins
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Jenkins is an open source automation server. Jenkins provides hundreds of plugins to support building, deploying and automating any project. As an extensible automation server, Jenkins can be used as a simple CI server or turned into a continuous delivery hub for any project.N/A
Pricing
Atlassian BambooJenkins
Editions & Modules
1 Remote Agent
$1200
5 Remote Agents
$3200
10 Remote Agents
$5840
25 Remote Agents
$11,600
100 Remote Agents
$23,280
250 Remote Agents
$58,160
500 Remote Agents
$87,280
1000 Remote Agents
$133,840
2000 Remote Agents
$187,380
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Atlassian BambooJenkins
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian BambooJenkins
Considered Both Products
Atlassian Bamboo
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
We selected Bamboo because its capabilities to integrate with other Atlassian products specially Jira Software, Bitbucket and in some useful scenarios with Confluence. Also, we found these pros important for us: great user interface, easily agent deployment, Docker …
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Bamboo's ability to integrate with Bitbucket and Jira (the other two key systems we use) pretty much sealed the deal on our decision to choose Bamboo over other alternatives. Being able to map every build result back to the relevant code changes and Jira issues are just too …
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Jenkins is the only other we had briefly considered for continuous deployment type of products, but being open source could not get the same level of reliability and support offered from Bamboo's product maturity.
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Bamboo has a friendlier interface than either TeamCity or Jenkins and has better integration with Jira and Bitbucket
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
We looked at Bitbucket and some other providers but they did not have the full requirements that we needed from a customization perspective. We wanted customization while keeping a lot of the configurability intact.
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
In the beginning we had selected Bamboo and were down the path of going all in for all of our projects. However after about a year we decided that Azure DevOps was better suited for our business needs. We are now in the process of migrating everything off of the Bamboo …
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
We used Jenkins before for our projects.
While Jenkins has an extensive plugins list that makes it more flexible to integrate it with other tools, we switched to Bamboo for nicer User Interface but mostly for the seamless integration with Jira and Bitbucket. Also Bamboo has more …
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Bamboo is great tool when compared to the open-source alternative Jenkins, with mainly the same functionality in both it really shines with its integration of the Atlassian product line. Jenkins works really well with a huge community of users and plenty of plugins that are …
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
We chose Bamboo over Jenkins for 2 reasons - one, for its tight integration amongst all the products in the tool suite. We find explicit value in the traceability from JIRA issues all the way down to the Bamboo build that was triggered by the check in of those issues. The …
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Bamboo has these advantages while asana does not:
  • Easy to configure
  • Easy to use
  • Clean UI and easy permission controls
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Jenkins works great, but Bamboo is just fantastic when integrated with other Atlassian tools. Since we were using JIRA and Bitbucket, we went for Bamboo.
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Bamboo's seamless integration with Bitbucket made it a simple choice, and I couldn't be happier with its ease of use, logging, and reliability.
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
We selected bamboo after a thorough review process, we considered the following aspects:
  • Ease of use, cost, scalability, plugins, setup and maintenance, community and product support
  • Made sure it integrated with JIRA and Confluence
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
I use bamboo because it is mandated as the CI/CD solution to use across the organization that I work for. If I were working on my own project, I would almost certainly use a free solution like Travis CI or just spin up my own build servers using Docker, AWS, or something like …
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Bamboo won solely based on the fact we were "all-in" with Atlassian. TeamCity is now in the process of taking over as we transition off of Bamboo, and I think TeamCity stacks up nice against Bamboo thus far (too soon to tell).
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Bamboo integrates directly with our bug system (Jira) and source control system (Bitbucket). It allows us to get what we need to done without worrying about how it works with our other systems.
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
Bamboo is hands-down the best of these options if you rely on other products of Atlassian origin. Bamboo is not just built for teams, but teams-of-teams and teams of many workers. It has the administrative features you need to manage and maintain CI at scale. Enterprise model …
Chose Atlassian Bamboo
I didn't select Bamboo. I mentioned how it compared in other parts of this review, but to summarize:

  • Pros: easier to use and cleaner UI
Jenkins
Chose Jenkins
Jenkins is highly customizable, making it ideal for complex pipelines that require scripting, conditional logic, and integration with a variety of tools.Jenkins offers thousands of plugins, giving it unmatched versatility.
Chose Jenkins
Jenkins is highly customizable and flexible, supporting a wide range of plugins and integrations. Jenkins works with any version control system (Git, Subversion, etc.). Jenkins has a more mature ecosystem, and it may be better for large-scale, complex environments, especially …
Chose Jenkins
One of the most important factors for selecting Jenkins would be the cost. Since Jenkins is opensource, there is a good amount saved from licensing and software procurement costs. Apart from cost, Jenkins is easy to understand and there is wide range of documentation and …
Chose Jenkins
Bitbucket building was very slow, in order to improve that you have to upgrade to spend double or more minutes per build minute. The GUI was also very slow in updating on the progress of the builds, making things rather confusing. Gitlab worked a bit better in my opinion, but …
Chose Jenkins
Jenkins is very easy to use, open source tool. Its better for simple build and deployments.
Chose Jenkins
GitLab CI and Github Actions are other powerful options in the market also with a rising popularity and high interoperability with their respective platform.
But Jenkins is still a good option for complex pipelines that require scripting and logic. Also, Jenkins uses as runtime …
Chose Jenkins
I have used Spinnaker as a CD tool. Though it's a very powerful CD tool we still needed Jenkins for CI, so to save some hassle for us we opt Jenkins solely.
Chose Jenkins
Didn't really check other tools in detail since Jenkins served all our requirements and has been hugely popular.
Chose Jenkins
Overall, Jenkins is the easiest platform for someone who has no experience to come in and use effectively. We can get a junior engineer into Jenkins, give them access, and point them in the right direction with minimal hand-holding. The competing products I have used …
Chose Jenkins
Honestly, we use Jenkins for pretty much everything exclusively, so it's hard to compare.
Chose Jenkins
It's mostly stable and well-known within the DevOps community.
Chose Jenkins
We have not evaluated other similar products.
Chose Jenkins
Both Jenkins and TeamCity do a good job of automating CI/CD. Jenkins runs much leaner than TeamCity - it only needs about a Gig of free memory, whereas TeamCity needs a fat 4 Gig free. Many tasks in Jenkins yml config can be very cumbersome, especially running local and …
Chose Jenkins
Jenkins is the only solution that we've tried that just automatically generates builds.
Chose Jenkins
Jenkins is easy to set up and supports a wide range of plugins. So any type of deployment is very easy. We can easily deploy Node, Angular, React, Java, Python, etc. Projects. We can also provide different credentials to different employees. So easy to track what is done by …
Chose Jenkins
Team services, while very similar, did not really have that much more added features for the much higher price tag. The team has moved over to the subscription-based Visual Studio so we may be reevaluating this solution as now it is part of our subscription and no longer an …
Chose Jenkins
I don't have any experience with alternatives to Jenkins.
Chose Jenkins
Originally Jenkins was selected because it was the best around, but it has since been outclassed by more specific services or cloud-based services and tools that will do all of the heavy lifting for you. Jenkins still has a use case - but it's hard to argue the additional …
Chose Jenkins
The big difference between Jenkins and other alternative tools is that Jenkins is open source and it’s free. Jenkins is very much about simple functionality. It’s a general CI tool that offers basic automation. It’s the most common CI tool on the market with a large community …
Chose Jenkins
We went with drone.io ultimately for its first class support for container based workloads.
Chose Jenkins
We considered using Gitlab, but after some comparing, we found Jenkins was better in every way!
Chose Jenkins
Chef and Puppet Pipelines (formerly Distelli)
Best Alternatives
Atlassian BambooJenkins
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian BambooJenkins
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.3
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian BambooJenkins
Likelihood to Recommend
Large companies will find it particularly useful, but smaller companies and independent developers will not be able to afford the cost, and will not see many advantages compared to using an open source solution. However, having some software to handle continuous integration build servers as well as deployments, and doing this consistently between products, is absolutely essential.
Read full review
Jenkins is a highly customizable CI/CD tool with excellent community support. One can use Jenkins to build and deploy monolith services to microservices with ease. It can handle multiple "builds" per agent simultaneously, but the process can be resource hungry, and you need some impressive specs server for that. With Jenkins, you can automate almost any task. Also, as it is an open source, we can save a load of money by not spending on enterprise CI/CD tools.
Read full review
Pros
  • Continuous Deployment - you can use Bamboo to automatically build and deploy whenever there are changes in the source code.
  • Continuous Integration - by integrating the automated tests and the integration tests before deploying you make sure you know immediately if the latest code fits into the whole scheme of apps.
  • Integration with Jira and Bitbucket.
  • Flexibility with the program language used for builds: Maven, Ant, PowerShell, any command line tools.
Read full review
  • Automated Builds: Jenkins is configured to monitor the version control system for new pull requests. Once a pull request is created, Jenkins automatically triggers a build process. It checks out the code, compiles it, and performs any necessary build steps specified in the configuration.
  • Unit Testing: Jenkins runs the suite of unit tests defined for the project. These tests verify the functionality of individual components and catch any regressions or errors. If any unit tests fail, Jenkins marks the build as unsuccessful, and the developer is notified to fix the issues.
  • Code Analysis: Jenkins integrates with code analysis tools like SonarQube or Checkstyle. It analyzes the code for quality, adherence to coding standards, and potential bugs or vulnerabilities. The results are reported back to the developer and the product review team for further inspection.
Read full review
Cons
  • Extremely hard barrier to entry for non-backend developers
  • Blackbox makes it hard to customize functionality
  • The inability to add features without breaking core functionality
  • No cloud solution
  • Tasks cannot be put in if/else statements
  • No clear right way to form build plans
Read full review
  • Jenkins can be vulnerable to security issues due to its open-source nature and the availability of many third-party plugins. There have been instances where malicious plugins have been discovered, and these can pose a significant risk to organisations.
  • Jenkins can require a significant amount of maintenance, particularly when dealing with plugin updates and compatibility issues. Maintaining a stable and up-to-date Jenkins instance can be a challenge for organisations with limited resources.
  • Jenkins' reporting capabilities are limited, and it can be challenging to extract meaningful insights from the data that Jenkins provides.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We have a certain buy-in as we have made a lot of integrations and useful tools around jenkins, so it would cost us quite some time to change to another tool. Besides that, it is very versatile, and once you have things set up, it feels unnecessary to change tool. It is also a plus that it is open source.
Read full review
Usability
Bamboo offers solid usability for teams looking for an integrated, scalable CI/CD solution, especially those using Atlassian tools. Its interface is intuitive for existing Atlassian users, and its focus on deployment automation makes it a strong option for continuous delivery. However, its complexity and cost may pose challenges for small teams or those new to CI/CD. Overall, Bamboo’s usability shines in environments where ease of integration and streamlined workflows are prioritized. Still, it may require more effort for teams unfamiliar with its setup or without dedicated resources.
Read full review
Jenkins streamlines development and provides end to end automated integration and deployment. It even supports Docker and Kubernetes using which container instances can be managed effectively. It is easy to add documentation and apply role based access to files and services using Jenkins giving full control to the users. Any deviation can be easily tracked using the audit logs.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No, when we integrated this with GitHub, it becomes more easy and smart to manage and control our workforce. Our distributed workforce is now streamlined to a single bucket. All of our codes and production outputs are now automatically synced with all the workers. There are many cases when our in-house team makes changes in the release, our remote workers make another release with other environment variables. So it is better to get all of the work in control.
Read full review
Support Rating
Support for Bamboo has started lack a little over the years. Atlassian has been moving more towards Bitbucket Pipelines and away from the on-premise install of Bamboo. While the tool is still great, it may take a little bit of time to get a question answered by official support.
Read full review
As with all open source solutions, the support can be minimal and the information that you can find online can at times be misleading. Support may be one of the only real downsides to the overall software package. The user community can be helpful and is needed as the product is not the most user-friendly thing we have used.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It is worth well the time to setup Jenkins in a docker container. It is also well worth to take the time to move any "Jenkins configuration" into Jenkinsfiles and not take shortcuts.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We chose Bamboo over Jenkins for 2 reasons - one, for its tight integration amongst all the products in the tool suite. We find explicit value in the traceability from JIRA issues all the way down to the Bamboo build that was triggered by the check in of those issues. The second reason was for support - we didn't want the burden of figuring out how to support Jenkins in our production environment, as can be the case with so many open source products.
Read full review
Overall, Jenkins is the easiest platform for someone who has no experience to come in and use effectively. We can get a junior engineer into Jenkins, give them access, and point them in the right direction with minimal hand-holding. The competing products I have used (TravisCI/GitLab/Azure) provide other options but can obfuscate the process due to the lack of straightforward simplicity. In other areas (capability, power, customization), Jenkins keeps up with the competition and, in some areas, like customization, exceeds others.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Bamboo was neither very positive or negative. Most of our spend was in man hours on research and development
  • We felt it was worth it for larger projects
  • Smaller projects had too much setup and run and caused a negative ROI
Read full review
  • We run about 30 test projects through Jenkins every day, multiple times a day; this allows us to focus on new tests rather than manually running all these tests.
  • We rely heavily on reporting capabilities and email notifications; we have some jobs that send emails every time they run so we know if there is an issue with any of our services.
Read full review
ScreenShots