AVNARO vs. Azure DevOps Server vs. IBM Targetprocess

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AVNARO
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Azure DevOps Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Targetprocess is a Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) SaaS that connects strategy, funding, and execution. It helps enterprises prioritize work, dynamically allocate resources, and continuously adapt plans. With real-time visibility and financial insights, organizations can deliver faster, clearer business outcomes.N/A
Pricing
AVNAROAzure DevOps ServerIBM Targetprocess
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AVNAROAzure DevOps ServerIBM Targetprocess
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AVNAROAzure DevOps ServerIBM Targetprocess
Considered Multiple Products
AVNARO

No answer on this topic

Azure DevOps Server

No answer on this topic

IBM Targetprocess
Chose IBM Targetprocess
It really depends what you are looking for as a company. Targetprocess is basically a very powerful engine that requires a lot of thinking and maintenance to get a positive ROI. It is nowhere near a plug and play solution that you could present to your teams right away. On that …
Features
AVNAROAzure DevOps ServerIBM Targetprocess
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
AVNARO
-
Ratings
Azure DevOps Server
-
Ratings
IBM Targetprocess
7.1
39 Ratings
6% below category average
Task Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.537 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.335 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings00 Ratings6.426 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings00 Ratings6.629 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings00 Ratings8.338 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings00 Ratings5.933 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.326 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.327 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings00 Ratings6.519 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings00 Ratings8.223 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings00 Ratings6.923 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.725 Ratings
Search00 Ratings00 Ratings5.336 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings00 Ratings6.835 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
AVNARO
-
Ratings
Azure DevOps Server
-
Ratings
IBM Targetprocess
7.3
40 Ratings
8% below category average
DevOps Tool Integrations00 Ratings00 Ratings8.131 Ratings
Code Review00 Ratings00 Ratings7.521 Ratings
Code Collaboration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.620 Ratings
Velocity Calculation00 Ratings00 Ratings6.732 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers00 Ratings00 Ratings6.838 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AVNAROAzure DevOps ServerIBM Targetprocess
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.6 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AVNAROAzure DevOps ServerIBM Targetprocess
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(48 ratings)
8.7
(42 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(4 ratings)
6.9
(4 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(10 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AVNAROAzure DevOps ServerIBM Targetprocess
Likelihood to Recommend
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Azure DevOps is good to use if you are all-in on the Microsoft Azure stack. It's fully integrated across Azure so it is a point-and-click for most of what you will need to achieve. If you are new to Azure make sure you get some outside experience to help you otherwise it is very easy to overcomplicate things and go down the wrong track, or for you to manually create things that come out of the box.
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
Apptio Targetprocess is well suited to track work and progress of that work. In addition it is easy to tie that work to OKRs. Cost and hours rollup across the work hierarchy works well. Our users like the flexibility of Targetprocess and the ability to develop their own views and reports Scenarios where it is less appropriate is to do executive level reporting and develop reports that can pull in all of our time data since there is a 300k record limit
Read full review
Pros
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • Reporting Integration- Azure boards provides Kanban and other dashboard, their templates for easy management of project.
  • Project Pipeline- easy integration and development of CI/CD pipelines, helped in testing, releasing project artifacts.
  • Version Control- Integration with Git and code IDE made it easy to share, review our code, fix bugs and do testing.
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
  • Extremely flexible: We are able to setup work for different groups in ways that work best for them.
  • Fantastic support group: They are extremely knowledgeable and helpful. I enjoy working with them.
  • Automation: Their automation capabilities have saved us a lot of time.
  • Customizing screens: We can go into code for the different entities, move fields around or hide them, add tabs or additional sections as needed to make for a streamlined user experience.
  • Reporting: Their reporting is flexible and phenomenal. There are so many different ways to pull data and the interface is easy to use.
  • Their user guide is well built and extremely helpful.
Read full review
Cons
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • Can add more build templates for specific technology requirements
  • Can have more features in dashboards which can help dev teams stream line their tasks and priorities
  • Can have raise alarm feature in case of any sort of failure in devops pipeline execution
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
  • The UI is bit complex for new users who never used it. i think this can be sorted out by providing the steps to access?
  • dashboards with large datasets can cause performance lags or timeouts
  • Introduce more flexible, template-based RBAC configurations.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
Targetprocess is the most flexible application for tracking work among teams that we have found. This power comes from near limitless ability to customize your views on the work tracked in the system, and from the myriad reporting options to draw metrics and stats out of the data there. Custom fields, processes, and mashups all add to this flexibility and appeal.
Read full review
Usability
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
Overall Targetprocess's usability is good. the tool is easy to use and has features which most BUs and organizations can use. Additional features like AI integration would help the tool and its overall usability. providing additional dashboards for specific roles and executives within the tool would benefit Targetprocess with its scale
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Apptio an IBM Company
Some minor outages are experienced, though these tend to pass within an hour usually and work can continue
Read full review
Performance
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Apptio an IBM Company
Reports are fast loading, considering they can refresh in a second or less and we have 7 years of work tracked in over 40k entities. Pages can load slowly when the views are very busy, but not frustratingly. I am a console user most of my career and generally prefer it over webUI interfaces, but Targetprocess won me over from the beginning and I spend half my day using it now.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
TargetProcess' support is one of its strengths. The support team is very responsive and helpful when there is a problem but they're also proactive in providing good release notes and engaging with the community through a voting scheme to influence the priority of new features.
The team also releases new versions frequently with new features but with no knock-ons to currently working features.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
You should take some time to get everyone to agree how the system should be setup before work starts being tracked in Targetprocess, this avoids difficult and disruptive changes to processes or plugins later when everyone relies on it daily.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
In my opinion, DevOps covers the development process end to end way better than Jira or GitHub. Both competitors are nice in their specific fields but DevOps provides a more comprehensive package in my opinion. It is still crazy to see that the whole suite can be used for free. The productivity increase we realized with DevOps is worth real money!
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
I would say TargetProcess is an incredibly wonderful tool. As compare to JIRA Software, it is a fully featured product. It fulfills all my business needs. Tracking efficiency of this application is quite favorable
in order to track all the details from a certain project in just a few minutes.
Read full review
Scalability
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Apptio an IBM Company
We use the hosted version of Targetprocess and have never run into limitations or degraded performance due to scalability. Excellent performance over 7 years!
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apex Technology Systems
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
  • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
  • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
Read full review
Apptio an IBM Company
  • No direct positive business ROI has caused executive leadership to play down use of the tool
  • We are hoping to use this to track progress of OKRs and business strategy, but don't have but in from executives on the value of this yet.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Targetprocess Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demandScreenshot of Program Management: To deliver value throughout a strategic portfolioScreenshot of Portfolio Budgeting: Shifting from project to product fundingScreenshot of Strategic Planning: Continuously links work, labor, and investments to business strategyScreenshot of Workforce ManagementScreenshot of Work