AWS Backup vs. HPE Zerto Software

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Backup
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
AWS Backup is a fully managed backup service from AWS, designed to make it easy to centralize and automate the back up of data across AWS services in the cloud as well as on premises using the AWS Storage Gateway. Using AWS Backup, users can centrally configure backup policies and monitor backup activity for AWS resources, such as Amazon EBS volumes, Amazon RDS databases, Amazon DynamoDB tables, Amazon EFS file systems, and AWS Storage Gateway volumes.
$0.01
per GB per month
HPE Zerto Software
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
HPE Zerto Software aims to enable customers to run an always-on business by simplifying the protection, recovery, and mobility of on-premises and cloud applications.N/A
Pricing
AWS BackupHPE Zerto Software
Editions & Modules
Backup Storage - Cold Storage
$0.01
per GB per month
Restore - Warm Storage
$0.02
per GB per month
Restore - Cold Storage
$0.03
per GB per month
Backup Storage - Warm Storage
$0.095
per GB per month
Restore - Item-Level Restore
$0.50
per request
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS BackupHPE Zerto Software
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS BackupHPE Zerto Software
Features
AWS BackupHPE Zerto Software
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
AWS Backup
8.9
6 Ratings
4% above category average
HPE Zerto Software
8.3
3 Ratings
3% above category average
Management dashboard8.36 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Retention options7.26 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Encryption8.36 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Universal recovery00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Instant recovery00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
Business application protection00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Incremental backup identification00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Backup to the cloud00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Snapshots00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
AWS Backup
7.8
3 Ratings
2% below category average
HPE Zerto Software
8.3
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Operational reporting and analytics7.93 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Malware protection7.93 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery7.63 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Continuous data protection00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Replication00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
SaaS Backup
Comparison of SaaS Backup features of Product A and Product B
AWS Backup
7.9
3 Ratings
9% below category average
HPE Zerto Software
-
Ratings
SaaS Product Integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Data Restoration Options7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Auditing and Search7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Storage in the Cloud or On-Premises8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Disaster Recovery
Comparison of Disaster Recovery features of Product A and Product B
AWS Backup
-
Ratings
HPE Zerto Software
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Disaster Recovery Planning00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Hot Sites00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Disaster Recovery Testing00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
Automated Disaster Recovery00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AWS BackupHPE Zerto Software
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Keepit
Keepit
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS BackupHPE Zerto Software
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(12 ratings)
8.3
(54 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(5 ratings)
8.0
(29 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(4 ratings)
4.0
(34 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(16 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS BackupHPE Zerto Software
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
There is a cost involved with data retrieval. AWS Backup is truly that, a backup. If you need to access this data on a regular basis, there are better options out there. For long term, just in case incremental backups, AWS [Backup] checks all the boxes. Just set it up, start your backups, and rest assured your data is safe.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Zerto is well suited for disaster recovery and virtual machine replication between multiple data centers. DR testing for audit or regulations is much easier with Zerto, great reporting, dashboard etc. It is not well suited for physical server replication for disaster recovery or as a primary backup solution.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Centralized management - single pane of glass to manage backups for multiple AWS services.
  • Encryption - integrates with KMS to encrypt backup data at rest and in transit.
  • Cross Account management - manage backups across multiple AWS accounts with AWS organizations.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • Anyone with a large disk (VMDK) knows the issues of VMware snapshots. Most backup software is a "point in time backup" that uses snapshots. While the backup can be run multiple times per day the stress of the snapshot on the host and storage is eliminated by the continuous protection of Zerto log replication.
  • A client had a the disks on a VM go missing for some reason. We had them "flip the switch" for a real fail over and press the fail over button. The VM on our DR site started to come alive as the VM at the customer site was brought down. When the DR VM was fully up, automatic reverse replication started. The DR machine was available in a few minutes (to take into account different host hardware) for access. One the vm at both sites were in sync, we had the customer again repeat the fail over process and the DR site VM was turned off and the Production site VM was brought back on line. This was a 200 GB VM and the whole process was finished in about 3 hours.
  • Zerto also allows for "Test" fail overs that can be configured on many different functions, such as host, datastore, network and IP usage. Configuring the IPs is crucial to avoid inadvertent site cross contamination of the same VM.
  • Zerto can also retrieve files from any VM disk on the DR site without starting a VM. Very handy for retrieving files or directories.
  • Since Zerto is running continuous log replication, changes on the production VM are nearly instantaneously copied to the DR site. As with any data process, having sufficient bandwidth for "churn" peaks minimizes the delay in updating the DR site.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Restoring the compute nodes of the cluster should be done always
  • Having the default Roles all the necessary permission, you have to add some depending on your configurations
  • Being able to see the Jobs status in a centralize account more graphically
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • Moving a VM from one protection group to another could be simplified.
  • I would like to see an executive-style report of recovery and testing for upper management.
  • The ability to deploy Zerto as a virtual appliance, without the need for a windows server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
We really like the easy setup of this replication solution, as well as the ease of management. Not to mention, our internal IT Economist determined that the Zerto solution would provide the best ROI out of the competing solutions we analyzed. So far, his calculations have been spot on, and we have saved substantially
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Overall because I can sell it white labeled and use my white labeled software like CloudBerry and the native backup apps on my synology NAS servers to store things in real time and do duplication and disaster recovery directly to it was game changing for my client in the advertising world they are never down now.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Zerto is very easy to implement and support. Uses are broad, only issues are once something doesn't sync it is difficult to get assistance until your reach tier 2 or tier 3 support. Basic file and folder recovery is great. Live and test fail overs are also easy to implement without issue.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
Support for AWS Backup is by Amazon itself so it is solid as always. If you have a business or higher level support plan you'll have no trouble getting engineers or other staff on the job to help you with whatever comes up.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Overall support is very good. We sometimes get pushback when asking Level 1 support to escalate to Level 2. This causes undue frustrations when you need a more knowledgeable support person to get involved. We've had to escalate to account reps a few times for this scenario. Zerto is very responsive and normally handles our requests very quickly.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Make sure the end goal is in mind before implementing. That way results meet expectations.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
I've tried a lot of different products. Backblaze, at least from a birds-eye view is significantly cheaper than AWS/the rest. Backblaze is a little more simpler, but it's well worth it. Linode also provides backup options, however I'm only familiar with their backup on their VPS's (however you make that plural), which never gave me a problem.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
We started out using Backup Exec which was in service until we virtualized our environment where it didn't perform as well at the time. Then we switched to Veeam which worked well, but then as we started needing to do migrations and off-site DR, we found ourselves relying on Zerto more often.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
For my organization, the pricing model was an upfront investment for the Zerto licenses. My organization prefers to pay upfront and not deal with month-to-month or year-to-year pricing models that most companies are moving to. But for some, the investment may be more than they can afford, and would prefer the year-to-year pricing model.
Read full review
Professional Services
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
I mean, it was 6 years ago, but we were up and going with all applications synchronizing in short order. The longest tasks was getting the 30 TB of application data synchronized between the datacenters.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Offsite means a failure at our cloud provider means we can redeploy quickly to another data center or another provider quickly.
  • The cost can't be best.
  • Pay only for what you use. No need to pay for extra data that you don't need.
  • No minimums
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • Zerto is like having the best possible insurance ... it just works, and often provides the backups taken overnight that are key in recovering data/work between overnight backups.
  • Zerto easily enabled the move of primary datacenters by allowing easy failover to a secondary site, and failback to the primary site.
Read full review
ScreenShots

HPE Zerto Software Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of AnalyticsScreenshot of DashboardScreenshot of Failover TestScreenshot of vSphere