268 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.4 out of 100
22 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.7 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Platform-as-a-Service

    8.3

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    83%

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk ranks higher in 11/11 features

    Ease of building user interfaces

    9.3
    93%
    18 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Scalability

    8.9
    89%
    29 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Platform management overhead

    8.9
    89%
    28 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Workflow engine capability

    8.9
    89%
    23 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Platform access control

    7.3
    73%
    28 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Services-enabled integration

    6.8
    68%
    28 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Development environment creation

    8.6
    86%
    28 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Development environment replication

    8.3
    83%
    29 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Issue monitoring and notification

    7.6
    76%
    28 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Issue recovery

    8.5
    85%
    26 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Upgrades and platform fixes

    7.9
    79%
    27 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • AWS Elastic Beanstalk is rated higher in 1 area: Support Rating
    • Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.0

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    80%
    29 Ratings
    8.8

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    88%
    9 Ratings

    Likelihood to Renew

    7.9

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    79%
    2 Ratings

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Usability

    7.7

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    77%
    9 Ratings

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support Rating

    8.0

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    80%
    24 Ratings
    7.0

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    70%
    2 Ratings

    Implementation Rating

    7.0

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    70%
    4 Ratings

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk is well suited for [the] rapid development of applications that use standard compute platforms based on popular programming languages. So getting a Go, Python, Ruby, or Node.js app going in AWS Elastic Beanstalk will be easy. For non-standard applications, containers provide another option for using AWS Elastic Beanstalk. In either case, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is well suited for applications that are [self-contained]. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is also good for development or test environments that need a built-in deployment method.AWS Elastic Beanstalk is less appropriate for complex applications that rely on multiple AWS services. While deploying and running the base code might be easy to get going, it may be difficult to apply permissions and integrations with the other services.
    Michael Jenkins | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    OpenShift is well suited if you want to use docker and [Kubernetes] but you want to hide the complexity of these two technologies. It gives a developer much more freedom in terms of code deployment, builds process, and implementation. One of its strengths is scaling and you can easily configure it for each application.
    Lavish Garg | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pros

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    • AWS Elastic Beanstalk was easy to implement, we only had to insert the application code to have it up and running in a few minutes. This helps us to launch company campaigns for different areas such as marketing, commercial and human resources.
    • It has a fast learning curve, since the training material of the platform is public on the manufacturer's portal, furthermore it is easy to interact and intuitive for developers.
    • The productivity of the equipment is optimized since they are not worrying about preparing the platform or infrastructure, they only have to attend to what is required by the application and its operation and this maintenance.
    • The indicators and metrics that it has, ensure that the application cannot be saturated and have a performance problem, with AWS Elastic Beanstalk the application can scale resources when needed automatically.
    Diego Gamez | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    • Implementing and integration platform to move infrastructure from on-premise hardware to the cloud[.]
    • Establishes a robust network and an updated infrastructure to develop intelligent and integrated services[.]
    • Makes internal development easier and faster and improves data access to developers[.]
    Stuart Anderson | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Cons

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    • Limited to the frameworks and configurations that AWS supports. There is no native way to use Elastic Beanstalk to deploy a Go application behind Nginx, for example.
    • It's not always clear what's changed on an underlying system when AWS updates an EB stack; the new version is announced, but AWS does not say what specifically changed in the underlying configuration. This can have unintended consequences and result in additional work in order to figure out what changes were made.
    Joshua Dickson | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    • Better API integration with a wider eco system
    • CLI, UI and API could be better in terms of usability
    • More security feature for east and west traffic, proxy and load balancing
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pricing Details

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    General

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Yes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    $35 per month

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk Editions & Modules

    Edition
    No Charge$01
    1. Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
    Additional Pricing Details

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    General

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Editions & Modules

    Additional Pricing Details

    Likelihood to Renew

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk 7.9
    Based on 2 answers
    As our technology grows, it makes more sense to individually provision each server rather than have it done via beanstalk. There are several reasons to do so, which I cannot explain without further diving into the architecture itself, but I can tell you this. With automation, you also loose the flexibility to morph the system for your specific needs. So if you expect that in future you need more customization to your deployment process, then there is a good chance that you might try to do things individually rather than use an automation like beanstalk.
    Rahul Chaudhary | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Usability

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk 7.7
    Based on 9 answers
    It is a great tool to manage your applications. You just need to write the codes, and after that with one click, your app will be online and accessible from the internet. That is a huge help for people who do not know about infrastructure or do not want to spend money on maintaining infrastructure.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Support Rating

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk 8.0
    Based on 24 answers
    As I described earlier it has been really cost effective and really easy for fellow developers who don't want to waste weeks and weeks into learning and manually deploying stuff which basically takes month to create and go live with the Minimal viable product (MVP). With AWS Beanstalk within a week a developer can go live with the Minimal viable product easily.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud 7.0
    Based on 2 answers
    I think response time for IBM Cloud support should be improved.
    Gonzalo Angeleri | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Implementation Rating

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk 7.0
    Based on 4 answers
    - Do as many experiments as you can before you commit on using beanstalk or other AWS features.- Keep future state in mind. Think through what comes next, and if that is technically possible to do so.- Always factor in cost in terms of scaling.- We learned a valuable lesson when we wanted to go multi-region, because then we realized many things needs to change in code. So if you plan on using this a lot, factor multiple regions.
    Rahul Chaudhary | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Alternatives Considered

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk handles better in server autoscaling, load balancers,networking infrastructure for databases.It also helps in creating all of the architecture needed to run our apps and services.[AWS] Elastic Beanstalk also handles all of the provisioning, scaling, and implementation of the application stack unlike other competitors without a fuss.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    We are using IBM Cloud App ID as a simple method to get an OIDC provider for our applications, that are running within the OpenShift cluster. Also, IBM Cloud Object Storage is used within the workload to store data via an s3 compliant way. The IBM Cloud Container Registry is an easy way to store the container images, that are used within the OpenShift cluster. Especially we configured the system in such a way to stop the image delivery if the container images are vulnerable. IBMs Cloud Pak for Integration and Business Automation is providing a rich feature set, that is tackling a lot of use-cases. They are both installable in the provided cluster easily.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Return on Investment

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    • Greatly reduced time in setting up and deploying test environments has saved a lot of hours and money.
    • Near-zero maintenance means that we don't spend any time tending to servers, the app containers just work.
    • The initial learning curve is a little steep to get services hosted in Elastic Beanstalk talking to external services like Redis, MongoDB, etc; but once one understands the pattern, development is a breeze.
    • The command line interface has enabled us to build many utility scripts that simplify our development workflow, thereby saving time.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

    • Helped us migrate on perm apps to cloud
    • Provided easy to use dev experience for devs without kube experience
    • Provided a secure rbac solution for many different teams running workloads on the same cluster
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Add comparison