Azure Container Apps vs. SAP Business Technology Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Container Apps
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Container Apps, part of the Azure suite of products from Microsoft, is a service used to deploy containerized apps without managing complex infrastructure. Users can write code using a preferred programming language or framework, and build microservices with full support for Distributed Application Runtime (Dapr). Scale dynamically based on HTTP traffic or events powered by Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA).N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP) is the company's Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offering, that brings together intelligent enterprise applications with database and data management, analytics, integration and extension capabilities into one platform for both cloud and hybrid environments, including hundreds of pre-built integrations for SAP and third-party applications.N/A
Pricing
Azure Container AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Editions & Modules
vCPU (seconds)
active usage $0.000024 and idle usage $0.000003
per second 180,000 vCPU-seconds free grant per month
Memory (GiB-Seconds)
active usage $0.000003 and idle usage $0.000003
per second 360,000 GiB-seconds free grant per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Container AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Container AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Features
Azure Container AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Azure Container Apps
5.4
2 Ratings
36% below category average
SAP Business Technology Platform
7.5
790 Ratings
4% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces5.72 Ratings7.9756 Ratings
Scalability7.72 Ratings7.9752 Ratings
Platform management overhead6.62 Ratings7.3711 Ratings
Workflow engine capability5.72 Ratings7.5633 Ratings
Platform access control4.62 Ratings7.5723 Ratings
Services-enabled integration4.72 Ratings7.9709 Ratings
Development environment creation4.32 Ratings7.8698 Ratings
Development environment replication4.02 Ratings7.5612 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification5.42 Ratings7.0690 Ratings
Issue recovery4.02 Ratings6.8611 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes6.32 Ratings7.4657 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Container AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Container AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(2 ratings)
8.4
(676 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
2.0
(1 ratings)
8.8
(24 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.8
(661 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(456 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(11 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.7
(3 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(3 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
3.9
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
3.5
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Container AppsSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Container Apps is a welcome addition for sure. Based on my experience, this has enabled us to move fully to the cloud and managed everywhere in one spot and on the go. We can scale it to our end as much as we would like. It can be assess anywhere and it is fully secure
Read full review
SAP
SAP Business Technology Platform is highly suitable for AI agentic development, particularly when workflows require dynamic orchestration, modular service integration, and real-time decisioning. However, it may be less effective in environments where backend services are fully encapsulated and do not expose interfaces or events that SAP Business Technology Platform can interact with—limiting its ability to orchestrate or extend those services meaningfully.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Gives user a level of autonomous access
  • No control plane or node pool to manage
  • Less kubernetes experience required
  • Easily integrate with Azure devops
Read full review
SAP
  • Services are operated by SAP with outstanding support, always giving a helping hand even if it is custom code or solution provided on the platform
  • Services are easily connectable via standard approach to our backend SAP systems in SAP Rise/HEC
  • Secure access using identities from our existing identity management helping us to safeguard data security from within SAP systems up to custom frontend applications
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Continue to enhance security
  • Better pricing
  • Flexibility
Read full review
SAP
  • For IAG, if there are multiple roles it can be overwhelming from an UX standpoint.
  • Controlling and identifying shadow user creation is not as intuitive.
  • Unlocking admin rights to an environment seems very easy if having elevated permissions, this seems like something that should have more controls rather than being able to unlock admin rights yourself.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
I would rather use AKS for my critical applications. The fact that the deployment process is dependent on as cli makes it hard for us to integrate with our standard CI/CD tools
Read full review
SAP
Seamless integration with external system and dashboard to monitor the data flow and analysis are very essential for the business. The way the product is designed and modelled lead to minimum business disruptions. Adopting to the new and modern technology was easy. Keeping the central system as clean and adopting project bases development are advantages.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Azure Container Apps are fantastic and it is a game changer. I would recommend it to anyone considering it. As you can scale it to what you would like and it is fully cloud native with better security. It is a no brainier not to consider it. I do believe that with further improve it will become even more attractive
Read full review
SAP
Okay, so the content that we have built on the platform is limited to specific testing on the iFlows within integration suite. The visualization layer is nice to use and helps with the design elements, however with developers that are more used to markup languages, it doesn't have the same CLI type feel when you want it. Perhaps the majority of users are that deep, but other platforms have a better CLI type developer experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Services are generally available
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
The biggest problem we ran into was communication between SAP Business Technology Platform and onsite resources. Unfortunately our SAP Business Technology Platform and Cloud systems are under different customer numbers. I constantly had to open tickets under each customer number because I was unsure of where the issue lied. And having to create a dummy ticket for our ECC systems to open the ECC connections for another ticket under the Cloud customer is a pain.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Training material in Developers Community or from Learning hub are really good... also most of the time we route through Discovery center... so materials provided by SAP is really good.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Having a full cloud native environment for devlopment of microservices and digitals solutions while having standardized access to our core data on SAP via cloud connector is one of the main benefits of using BTP over others hypervisors. BTP is the standard hyperscaler as soon as something relies on data from SAP systems in our company now
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Read full review
SAP
Initially, SAP Business Technology Platform works hand in hand with S/4 HANA and the SAP product suite, but also can go and extra mile and integrate with other non-SAP products and services at hand. It's capable enough to understand the ERP use cases component and develop intelligent applications to satisfy the users.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
It's scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • As it is cloud native, we no longer required to have onsite prem
  • Reducing both from an energy and security perspective
  • It is worth the investment as we have saved about 10% of our ICT cost
Read full review
SAP
  • Still using traditional devops instead of using build. Very high cost in development.
  • Still using Node.js instead of REST ABAP. Additional cost of resources. Migration of current CAP to RAP will be costly and do not have a business case yet. Continue with multi-language is costly.
  • Integration suite is power but the migration from PIPO to IS has been more challenging than being advertised.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Business Technology Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Build Process Automation, an SAP BTP service