Beeceptor vs. BrowserStack

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Beeceptor
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Beeceptor is a no-code Service Virtualization platform for all kinds of HTTP services including REST APIs, SOAP & GraphQL. It can be used to create mock server, define service behaviors in a few seconds, and simulate services without writing any code. Beeceptor features include a realtime traffic inspection, rule-based mocking, stateful mocks, and flexible environment switching. Beeceptor simplifies service mocking, and debugging, and shifts-left the software development. It's an affordable…
$10
per month Per Mock Server, 15K requests
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
BrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.
$0
per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
Pricing
BeeceptorBrowserStack
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Percy - Free
$0
per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
App Percy - Free
$0
per month 5000 free screenshots and 100 minutes of infrastructure
Test Observability - Unlimited Free
$0
Accessibility Testing - Free
$0
Test Observability - Observability Pro
$0.01
per month per test execution
Percy - Desktop
$0.02
per month per screenshot
App Percy - Visual Core
$0.02
per month per screenshot
Percy - Desktop & Mobile
$0.02
per month per screenshot
App Percy - Visual Cloud
$0.03
per month per screenshot
Live - Desktop
$39
per month per user
Live - Desktop & Mobile
$49
per month per user
App Live - Individual
$49
per month per user
Automate - Desktop
$129
per month 1 parallel test
Live - Team
$175
per month 5 users
App Live - Team
$175
per month 5 users
Accessibility Testing - Team
$199
per month 5 users
Automate - Desktop & Mobile
$225
per month 1 parallel test
App Automate - Device Cloud
$249
per month 1 parallel test
App Live - Team Pro
$289
per month 5 users
App Automate - Device Cloud Pro
$299
per month 1 parallel test
Automate - Enterprise
Contact sales team
Percy - Enterprise
Contact Sales
App Automate - Enterprise
Contact Sales
App Live - Enterprise
Contact sales team
Live - Enterprise
Contact sales team
App Automate - Device Cloud Pro + Visual Cloud
Contact Sales
App Percy - Enterprise
Contact Sales
Test Observability - Enterprise
Contact Sales
Accessibility Testing - Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BeeceptorBrowserStack
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsBeeceptor is available in both cloud-based and on-premise editions, offering flexible deployment options tailored to your organization's unique needs. It has successfully met rigorous security standards by achieving SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance. For more information on pricing, and to request a comprehensive data sheet, please get in touch with our team.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BeeceptorBrowserStack
Best Alternatives
BeeceptorBrowserStack
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

TestComplete
TestComplete
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BeeceptorBrowserStack
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(244 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(19 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(23 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(5 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(78 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(24 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(8 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(6 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(6 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
BeeceptorBrowserStack
Likelihood to Recommend
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
Browserstack is great if you have a need for cross-browser or cross-device testing. You can even load in native apps/websites that might not be live on the public internet but are hosted on a secure network, which makes it easier to test against QA and STG environments as well. There might be better tools out there if you don't really have a need for that cross browser and device testing though and are just looking to set up some type of automation or only have a few devices or OSes that you need to test with. The value of the product will vary wildly depending on what you want to do with it.
Read full review
Pros
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
  • Test client website on 5x more platform.
  • Provide a real device with features like media injection and Physical SIM testing for manual testing of a specific feature.
  • Automate regression suite to execute parallel on multiple device.
  • Provide an accessibility report for the website through automated scanning of the site using site.xml.
Read full review
Cons
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
  • I wish it didn't time out so quickly. I often move back and forth between my native Mac OS system and browsers to BrowserStack for Windows browsers and it often times out so I have to start over.
  • I am not sure why, but when I've been testing in BrowserStack for a long period of time - maybe over a couple of hours, it sometimes gets buggy and unresponsive or slow to respond. It makes it hard to tell if I'm experiencing an issue with the site I'm testing or if it's an issue with BrowserStack.
  • If I'm wishing for the moon and stars, I'd ask for the ability to use BrowserStack to also test with JAWS screen reader. But I'm happy having NVDA.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
It's almost the 3rd year for us and it's renewal time for us. So yes, we are already discussing how many licenses we need to increase as users are increasing internally. So it's 100% sure that we are already planning renewal this year as well BrowserStack with live and app automate.
Read full review
Usability
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
So many options that it can be a little overwhelming, but the core functions are easy to find and use and it's usually not too hard to figure things out for the more complex tasks. Very easy to boot up a device and a specific browser from the dashboard to begin a manual website test.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
I rated BrowserStack's availability a 10 because it is consistently reliable, with minimal to no downtime or unplanned outages. The platform is accessible whenever needed, ensuring uninterrupted testing. Its robust infrastructure and proactive monitoring ensure a seamless experience, allowing us to meet deadlines without delays caused by availability issues and all
Read full review
Performance
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
The tests are fast considering the fact that they're Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI.
Read full review
Support Rating
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
I've not had much direct interaction with the BrowserStack support team. The help and community are great and we've not run into any issue that has really required us to reach out. I guess having a stable and easy to use system means you may never need to contact support.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training.
Read full review
Online Training
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
I rated the implementation satisfaction an 8 because while it went smoothly overall, there were some challenges during the initial learning phase and integration with existing tools. Key insights include the importance of providing sufficient training upfront and ensuring seamless integration with other systems to minimize disruptions and improve adoption speed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
BrowserStack products has been found better for low code automations and visual regression techniques. We have been struggling to maintain the API endpoint sanity tests and writing a lot of code for them while releasing the builds, while we chose BrowserStack accessibility solutions, we found it a way easier than we thought and worked it up.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
No Vendors were involved, directly dealt with Browserstack
Read full review
Scalability
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
I may not be the best person to answer this as I am only using it for 1 department and at 1 site but will still try my best As far as Scalability for Devices for Mobile Automation is concerned, it gets a Solid 10, as the users can run cases on upto 10 device parallel and also have the best choices of devices to choose
Read full review
Professional Services
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
Not used
Read full review
Return on Investment
Beeceptor
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
  • It reduced the cost of buying multiple devices as we have multiple devices access in it
  • Easily accessible from anywhere due to it cloud availability
  • Introducing this to our client also helped us in building trust as well as winning their confidence during deliverables
Read full review
ScreenShots

Beeceptor Screenshots

Screenshot of API Mock ServerScreenshot of Mock Rules Listing

BrowserStack Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of