BigHand Pitching and Proposals vs. PandaDoc
BigHand Pitching and Proposals vs. PandaDoc
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() BigHand Pitching and Proposals | N/A | BigHand Pitching and Proposals is an advanced legal pitching solution with a searchable data warehouse for optimized experience management. The solution allows business development and marketing teams to access relevant expertise and evidence from across the firm and present it in professional and compelling pitch documentation. | N/A | |
PandaDoc | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
| BigHand Pitching and Proposals | PandaDoc | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| BigHand Pitching and Proposals | PandaDoc |
|---|
| BigHand Pitching and Proposals | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | QuoteWerks Score 9.6 out of 10 | Foxit eSign Score 9.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | QuoteWerks Score 9.6 out of 10 | MSB Docs Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Conga CLM Score 8.7 out of 10 | DocuSign Score 8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| BigHand Pitching and Proposals | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.7 (329 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (18 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.3 (23 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.6 (21 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 6.1 (23 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 6.3 (4 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 2.8 (3 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (20 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 8.6 (4 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.7 (20 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 6.7 (4 ratings) |
| BigHand Pitching and Proposals | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Pros | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Cons | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Usability | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Performance | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Support Rating | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Scalability | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() BigHand No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots |








