BILL is an online service for SMBs which provides a central dashboard for managing Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, and cash flow management. It syncs with all major accounting systems like QuickBooks, Sage, Intaact, and NetSuite.
$45
per month
Certinia FM Cloud
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Pricing
BILL
Certinia FM Cloud
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$45
per user/per month
Team
$55
per user/per month
Corporate
$79
per user/per month
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BILL
Certinia FM Cloud
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BILL
Certinia FM Cloud
Features
BILL
Certinia FM Cloud
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
BILL
7.9
8 Ratings
5% above category average
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Customizable Approval Policies
8.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
Financial Document Management
7.68 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking
8.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail
8.28 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection
8.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced OCR
7.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic Funds Transfer
7.77 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts Payable
Comparison of Accounts Payable features of Product A and Product B
BILL
7.8
5 Ratings
11% above category average
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Automated Accounts Payable Processes
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Vendor Management
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tax Form Preparation
6.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
12% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
8.65 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
7% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.45 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.55 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.85 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
7.14 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
8.73 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
23% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
It depends, Bill.com certainly has a strong reputation and I agree it can be a great solution in the right scenario but I think the implementation and initial setup are critical and need to be well thought out based on the setup of the organization you are a part of.
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
Currently, our company uses a different platform to submit expenses, we only use bill.com to receive them. So perhaps this isn't actually a place where bill.com could improve, but the expense submission process may not have been robust enough for our company.
The bill.com platform wasn't the most beautiful or pleasing to use, but this is a minor fault.
I'd love a way to set up recurring payments (e.g., my phone bill is reimbursed each month).
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
While our firm does not use Bill.com internally, we know many customers that use Bill.com and are very happy with it. Based on the feedback from current users, I would say that the product should have a strong renewal forecast. Once customers move their AP to the cloud, they would be unlikely to move it back given a choice.
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Bill.com continues to raise the bar with new features and improved interface. The Fast Pay option is another innovation that reduces administrative time when you have to get an overnight check out. The new Chat Support interface, powered by Zopim, which is world-class, adds to the responsiveness of Bill.com's support team and makes getting real-time answers that much easier.
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
The only time Bill.com was ever "unavailable" was then the Sync to Quickbooks function failed. That happened a time or two but was usually quickly remedied. I'm not sure if that's an issue with newer online versions of Quickbooks Enterprise -- at the time we were using a remotely hosted Quickbooks instance accessed via terminal server (vs a cloud offering like Bill.com is)
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
I could not explain to them how I was trying to remove an old email account from my company page while granting the new email account access to the bank account that the first email account had added. The "set a bank account as inactive" button is labeled delete, but they don't seem to recognize that. I requested my Bill.com account be deleted on Wednesday so I could start all over with a fresh account; this seemed to be completed Wednesday night, but when I tried to create a new Bill.com account from the same email, it took me to my old bill.com account.
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
The online training provided by Bill.com is concise and since the firm consistently improves the platform functionality, users are able to select the training for the modules they specifically need.
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
1. Automation & Workflow Efficiency.2. Integration Capabilities with other softwaresWe needed a centralized, automated, and scalable solution for managing both payables and receivables. The strong integration with our existing accounting software was a key factor.The platform gave us better visibility and control over cash flow and approval processes.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
After receiving an offer to 'finance' outstanding invoices, I was enticed by the promise of a 3% total cost for a 60-day period, with the possibility of extending the financing for an additional 10 months (for an additional fee). Eager to access funds, I decided to finance an invoice worth $17,160.00. Within 24 hours, BILL deposited $16,645.20 (97% of the invoice amount) into my account.
However, when the customer paid their $17,160 invoice four days later, instead of the funds being deposited into my checking account as I expected, BILL chose to retire the loan and retain my $514.80 fee for the 4 day advance period. This unexpected turn of events resulted in an effective interest rate of a staggering 273.75%. It was clear that this arrangement was far from what I had initially understood, and the financial impact was outrageously high.
Frustratingly, my attempts to resolve this issue through customer service were in vain, as I spoke with three agents who provided no satisfactory solutions. To anyone contemplating using BILL's services, I strongly urge you to carefully scrutinize the fine print and consider opting for a more reputable finance company."