Easy Projects is a project management tool designed for a wide range of businesses (small to mid-sized and enterprise level). It includes both basic features like creating projects and tasks and filling in the calendar, and also some advanced ones, including an interactive Gantt chart, an executive dashboard, time tracking and billing. It provides integration with MS Outlook, is customizable and has SaaS/On-Premise options.
$15
per month
eSUB Construction Software
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
eSUB is a SaaS platform for commercial subcontractors running large, complex, long duration projects to proactively track and manage their costs, deadlines, deliverables and correspondence; the vendor says this can result in operational efficiencies and improved profits. eSUB is a cloud and mobile-based solution enabling real-time field updates from connected smartphones, tables and mobile PC users.
$39
per month per user
Projector PSA
Score 1.2 out of 10
N/A
Projector's cloud-based Professional Services Automation (PSA) software helps project-based services organizations track time and expenses, invoice clients, schedule resources, and manage projects. Its three modules span a more comprehensive set of uses than typical project management software. The Accounting module helps the user track time and expenses and manage invoices and billing. Also it syncs with the company's accounting systems as a sub-ledger. The Resource Scheduling module matches…
$15
per user
Pricing
Birdview
eSUB Construction Software
Projector PSA
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$6
per month
Business
$12
per month
Platform
$19
per month
Base
$39
per month (annually) per user
Advanced
$59
per month (annually) per user
Premium
Contact
Team Edition
$15
per user
Professional Edition
$25
per user
Enterprise Edition
$30
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Birdview
eSUB Construction Software
Projector PSA
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Birdview
eSUB Construction Software
Projector PSA
Features
Birdview
eSUB Construction Software
Projector PSA
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
8.1
15 Ratings
5% above category average
eSUB Construction Software
-
Ratings
Projector PSA
7.4
11 Ratings
4% below category average
Task Management
8.514 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.510 Ratings
Resource Management
7.113 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.510 Ratings
Gantt Charts
8.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Scheduling
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.511 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.57 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.82 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.23 Ratings
Document Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.57 Ratings
Email integration
7.911 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.65 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
3.77 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.511 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.23 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.19 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
8.3
5 Ratings
7% above category average
eSUB Construction Software
-
Ratings
Projector PSA
7.9
3 Ratings
2% above category average
Project & financial reporting
7.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Invoicing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
eSUB Construction Software
1.0
1 Ratings
150% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
eSUB Construction Software
1.0
1 Ratings
149% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
eSUB Construction Software
1.0
1 Ratings
149% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
eSUB Construction Software
2.5
1 Ratings
102% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Dashboards
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
eSUB Construction Software
3.5
2 Ratings
72% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Each member of our team can choose their own view, so they can see only what is relevant to them. Plus, we can keep track of everyone's progress without bothering them. Our team loves that everyone can have a different view, so they see only what's important to them. In addition, we can keep tabs on everyone's progress without pestering them. The user interface has some nice quality of life features, such as the different views for different members of our team.
If you are doing any sort of new construction, eSUB is a budget friendly option for managing the process. It's helpful for keeping track of submittals, RFI's and for foreman doing Daily Work Reports. It is not suited really well for plan management and scheduling. The modules for these are not well thought through. Also if you specialize in service work or projects that have short durations (i.e. 1-2 weeks or less), eSUB isn't the best option for you. It would take too long to set up a job vs the time it takes to do the job.
We think Projector PSA is a great tool to track and manage people in a professional service environment like management consulting. This system is easy to set up, easy to understand and should easily suit the needs of smaller and medium sized firms. It may be less appropriate for firms that rely very heavily on project management through another system (like MS Project) or firms that rely very heavily on a sales pipeline tracking system. While still very much possible to use, you would (I believe) have to do some re-keying between systems
It is built with subcontractors in mind. There are many PM software available but this one aims at the commercial subcontractor.
It does a great job covering the basics of typical commercial work. There are areas that allow you to customize such as adding reservations of rights to documents.
It can integrate with Microsoft quite a bit, we use this in our work every day and being able to export or sync data/calendars has been helpful.
Projector is a very well designed tool for project management. It has allowed us to eliminate a number of auxiliary tools for project timelines and WBS for the vast majority of our projects.
Time and expense entry is intuitive and quick for our staff.
Our forecasting and resource management capability has improved greatly with Projector and allows us to grow our team efficiently with minimal additional administrative burden.
Reporting is extremely robust. It does require some time to really get a handle on the full functionality of the reporting tool, but once you do, you can get almost any kind of report you want out of the system!
Easy Projects has some problems when it comes to accessing the site via different methods/browsers. It is either very slow or never works on a tablet. It is not smart-phone friendly. And it stopped working for us in Firefox -- all we could use is Safari or Chrome (we are a Mac-based office).
Easy Projects' email notifications are overwhelming. I turned them off completely since I was getting messages every time one little detail was added or changed.
While the reports are great, they are somewhat hard to pull. It takes a lot of trial and error -- I would not say the reports are an "intuitive area."
The biggest by far is what we fondly call "the screen of death." When you mark the last open task associated with a job as complete, a screen pops up that asks if you want to close the overall job, as well. The "yes" field is pre-selected, so if you are overzealous and click through quickly, it automatically closes the job. I don't know why they think this feature is helpful. We have so many staffers that complain they suddenly can't find their open job -- well, it's been marked completed and goes into the archive.
Release management process needs to be improved. Currently no facility is provided to test the impact of new releases in a sand-box. This introduces business risk if there are interfaces into Projector PSA as part of it's use in the business.
EP is great but could be better. EP has been a wonderful tool within our organization, it has helped us control expenses, resources, and the time needed to invest in each project, however when it comes to presenting reports and details it is a bit weak, there are more tools specialized in data visualization, and it would be good to make some kind of integration between EP and the other market alternatives
We have been using this tool for a year now and find our use of it continually evolves and broadens. We are also very excited about the overhaul that's under way and feel many of the improvements being put in place will help make us that much more effective and efficient. The Projector team is also very responsive and collaborative in terms of user feedback and improvement suggestions, which helps us know they will work hard to help us get what we need out of the tool.
In my personal experience, I only needed EP support once and the truth is that they attended me very well and very quickly, they helped me with what I needed, it was a question regarding the use of WebServices, they solved my doubt and then they contacted me another agent to verify that everything was resolved and if they could help me with anything else
It has been helpful whenever I've called. They have been able to walk me through solutions and even direct me to the right answer. There was only 1hr difference between time zones so this was manageable. If we experienced bugs, their IT department was helpful at remedying and they were always rolling out updates.
East Projects integrates with other financial systems such as NetSuite and Compass, which allows a great financial view into the existing and future projects and overall financial health of our resourcing. Other systems, such as Wrike and MS Projects, just focus on project/task management, whereas this is a one-stop shop. It also allows us to manage internal resources.
eSUB is not even close when it comes to the offerings that the others have. eSUB is a happy medium for the functionality it provides and is at an affordable price point that it doesn't break the bank. Other solutions are a lot more integrated into the company processes and procedures, which means more upfront investment to get the platform to go live. eSUB's simplicity makes it easier to roll out because it doesn't integrate with as many aspects of the business.
We did pursue Quick Arrow another tool that was similar. We found that be in inflexible in use. Projector allows a lot of flexibility in setup. Our organization has very specific business processes and we were able to set up Projector to work with those processes. Several other systems we tried were not as flexible in allowing set up to our needs.
Increased team collaboration improved the results significantly, because we managed to reduce the amount of time wasted on unnecessary iterations, therefore reducing costs.
The reasonable pricing enabled us to enjoy the service we needed with with less impact on our budget than we've expected.
Even in the small time that I stayed to see Projector PSA reporting I saw ROI projections become more realistic. There was real data to analyze that proved we were spending way too much and charging way too less on some projects.
Although employees were not used at entering their hours, this single reporting improved operations management and validated employees concerns that more people were needed to manage workload
Project proposals were more realistic because they were driven by real data.
Decision making overall for the department became more efficient and effective