BQE CORE is a business management solution built specifically for professional service firms. BQE CORE is a combination of a billing assistant, project management, and accounting solution. CORE is designed to do the hard work of delivering actionable insights directly to the user's dashboards or inbox. BQE CORE replaces the products Engineeroffice, Archioffice, and BillQuick; the functionality of these applications is now found in BQE CORE.
N/A
Contractor Foreman
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Pricing
BQE CORE
Contractor Foreman
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BQE CORE
Contractor Foreman
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BQE CORE
Contractor Foreman
Features
BQE CORE
Contractor Foreman
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
BQE CORE
7.8
74 Ratings
1% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.756 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
8.755 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
8.528 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.636 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.539 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
6.546 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
7.921 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
6.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
8.339 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
6.133 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.445 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
9.474 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
7.932 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.158 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
BQE CORE
8.3
56 Ratings
7% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates
8.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
Invoicing
8.949 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting
8.554 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
8.035 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
BQE CORE
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
54 Ratings
1% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.148 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.751 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
4.65 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
BQE CORE
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
5.9
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
4.63 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
3.74 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
4.51 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
BQE CORE
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
BQE CORE
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
8.8
68 Ratings
13% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.967 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.862 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.858 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
8.657 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
BQE CORE
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
8.0
72 Ratings
5% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
5.55 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
6.146 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
8.862 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
8.671 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
9.263 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
8.467 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
9.454 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
8.959 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
8.871 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
7.551 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
9.063 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
5.54 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
9.063 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
I would recommend this for our industry: architecture, engineering, or construction. I would recommend this for any larger firm with many employees or high number of projects. I would particularly recommend this for a company with projects that have budget constraints and where time tracking and expense tracking is very important. I would not recommend this complicated software for a small firm with a small amount of income or number of projects.
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs. One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient. It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork. Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes. Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
Invoice Collections within Billing is a great tool because of the ability to take notes and track contact.
Invoices are professional looking and easy for our clients to understand the overall progress within each phase of their project.
Dashboards are the best tool EVER!
The Contact List feature within Clients setup is the perfect way to track multiple project managers within a large company that also has multiple contracts with us.
Assigning contacts to particular roles - such as Invoicing, Contracts, etc.
Accounting Functionality - they are basically a project management accounting software, so in my opinion, they could learn some things from other accounting software such as QuickBooks etc.
Security and sensitive file visibility. Users with no permissions can have access to some hidden files.
Daily log navigation. Users now need to exit one log entirely to view or check another, resulting in a significant waste of time and reduced efficiency.
Customization options for reports. No options to set up and automatically send reports by email to specified users.
We have been using Core for a few years now, and honestly started to look at other software systems to see what was out there. What we chose was a nightmare for migration so we never left Core. Now we have added invoicing and payments from Core instead of double entry with QBO. Still only a few cycles in but looks like it will be up to speed soon and working smoothly.
The foundation is awesome, like I have said before, however the house being built on it, the educational resources being provided to us (more of sales pitches that don't work), and flexible workflow opportunities, is making us look elsewhere for how much we will be spending on per user. It's crazy to think how flexible they are not when it comes to user settings. Lack of integration with other sources is awful.
Overall, Contractor Foreman is a great product, and I’m sure we’ve only scratched the surface of everything it has to offer. It can be a little quirky at times, occasionally displaying a 'Bad Gateway' message, but we haven’t experienced any timeout issues in the past few months. As we continue to use it, I’m confident we’ll uncover even more ways to streamline our workflow
This is one area that does need some improvement. It can be slow at time, so we had our IT look at it from our side and we had no issues, so it has to be some slowness on their side.
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
As a new employee and CORE user, I talk to support on a weekly basis. I have never had to wait for more than 3 min to get connect with a support rep, and all my questions have been answered. The support representatives are polite and eager to help no matter how simple your question is.
We have only had one issue the entire time we have had Contractor Foreman and that was that we had the hardest time getting the platform to allow us to log in, but we called our support and within 5 mins we able to log back in
Deltek Vision is far more advanced, more encompassing and offers more flexibility with what you want to do. However, it's also quite difficult to use, whereas BQE CORE is intuitive and user friendly. The trade off is worth it in some arenas but overall it's not suited for a larger fast paced company. Great for smaller companies.
There's just no comparing these two. I'm actually going to suggest we keep CE to my boss, and here's why: Clearestimates is perfect for what I just described. You have a little job that you just BOOM it's done? Put it into Clearestimates. That system does not care at all if you did it "properly." Now Contractor Foreman does so. much. more. than CE. It just does. You can do everything on CF (just not anything haha). Most businesses wouldn't need anything else, but since we're still growing, we do some handyman stuff every now and again that CE is perfect for, and we don't have to go through CF's really picky system to make sure every little tiny thing is correct
Prior to using Contractor Foreman we had to wait until the end to capture all change orders in one summary. Now, with the client portal, we can capture in real time and the client has visibility.
We have been trying to reduce administration time in tracking field expenses and with Contractor Foreman our field crew can uplaod reciepts and track expenses right from their mobile phones.
Punchlist - the punch list and To Do features are so robust we have drastically improved getting punchlists and small tasks completed in single trips without the wasted time and travel of multiple trips due to missed/forgotten items.