Bugzilla vs. TrackJS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bugzilla
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
TrackJS
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
TrackJS is an error monitoring service for web applications. It provides enhanced stack traces and detailed telemetry for developers to understand how an error happened, how to recreate it, and how to fix it.N/A
Pricing
BugzillaTrackJS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BugzillaTrackJS
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$49 monthly page views
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BugzillaTrackJS
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
BugzillaTrackJS
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Bugzilla
-
Ratings
TrackJS
6.5
1 Ratings
16% below category average
Application monitoring00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Threshold alerts00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Predictive capabilities00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Application performance management console00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Collaboration tools00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BugzillaTrackJS
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BugzillaTrackJS
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(18 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BugzillaTrackJS
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
Buzilla is easy to use and provides basic functionality to use as a bug tracking tool. If big size attachments are allowed it would have been great. Also with Bugzilla home->Test management area is improved by allowing multiple sections it would be awesome!
Read full review
TrackJS
If you're not currently doing any JS error tracking or are just getting started, TrackJS is a great solution. If you are looking for a more technical solution, something like NewRelic may be more appropriate - but if the primary user isn't going to be a web developer and you're looking for something that is easier to use, I would recommend TrackJS.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Open source! No license fee involved, no limit to the number of licenses.
  • Easy to install and maintain. Installation is very easy and hardly needs any maintenance efforts, except when migrating from one version to other. Each project can have its own group of users.
  • Includes all the core features/fields that are needed to log a software bug/issue.
  • Multiple attachments are possible, supports various formats.
  • Good for reporting. Filtering mechanism lets you query bugs by various parameters.
Read full review
TrackJS
  • Easy to use
  • Time report is great
  • Great level of detail
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Cloud Based. I'd like to see bugzilla be cloud based. The company I currently work with made a final decision to change db's for this specific reason. Due to the frequency of travel in this company, they need access to bugzilla from differing national / international locations.
  • Larger File Attachments. I believe the limit of a bugzilla content upload is 4 megabytes. For many of our video'd issues, this file size is simply impractical without the additional effort exertion on video compressor applications.
Read full review
TrackJS
  • Price is a bit high
  • More customizable alerts would be great
  • Would love more detail related to site speed
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
For future projects I will look at something that is hosted in the cloud that I don't have to manage. I would also like something that has a more modern feel to allow my customers to use it as well as my employees.
Read full review
TrackJS
No answers on this topic
Usability
Open Source
This is a pretty straightforward system. You put in the bug details, a ticket is created, the team is notified. The user interface reflects this very simple and straightforward flow. It's certainly much easier than trying to track bugs with using Excel and email.
Read full review
TrackJS
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Open Source
I used it.
Read full review
TrackJS
No answers on this topic
Performance
Open Source
I like this rating.
Read full review
TrackJS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Open Source
Since it is open source, it doesn't have customer service. However, the amount of information on forums is vast. If you can wade through it, you'll get what you need
Read full review
TrackJS
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Open Source
I know it.
Read full review
TrackJS
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Open Source
Implementation was pretty simple. Particularly because the product cannot be customized so there is not much to do apart from getting it up and running.
Read full review
TrackJS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
We migrated away from the whole suite of Rational tools because of their massive complexity around administration and inflexibility regarding workflows. In addition, the suite was insanely expensive, and users hated the usability of the tools. We evaluated, and liked JIRA, but because the organization was looking for cost savings, we ended up going with Bugzilla and it's FOSS model so as to avoid ongoing costs.
Read full review
TrackJS
TrackJS is less technical and is easier to use than New Relic. New Relic provides more data, but is virtually unusable if you're not technical.
Read full review
Scalability
Open Source
I used it
Read full review
TrackJS
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • It has made the SDLC process more efficient. Bugs were logged and tracked in emails or in Excel sheets leading to slow communication and at time version issues with multiple files. Being an online tool, Bugzilla solved those issues, improved communication, instant status updates and improved efficiency.
  • We have used Bugzilla with a lot of federal goverment agencies (DHS, CMS, SAMHSA, CDC, HHS etc). Project Directors adn Principle Investigators were at times given access to Bugzilla which provided a snapshot of open vs closed issues.
  • Some groups would resist using Bugzilla with the email reminders being the main reason. Turning off or reminding them of features where we can 'control' email notification helped a lot.
Read full review
TrackJS
  • ROI has been positive. We've identified a few issues that we wouldn't have otherwise found without TrackJS.
Read full review
ScreenShots

TrackJS Screenshots

Screenshot of Dashboard of overall quality and website activity.Screenshot of Error impact report shows you the breadth of users and devices affected by an error.Screenshot of Discoverable filtering shows you anomalies in your error data.Screenshot of Error report with enhanced stack traces, inline source code, and telemetry analytics.