Conductor vs. DemandScience

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Conductor
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Conductor is an enterprise AEO platform that provides unified AEO & SEO intelligence, scaled AI content generation, and real-time website monitoring. From tracking visibility in LLMs to technical health and content optimization, Conductor’s platform empowers teams to increase authority and visibility in AI and traditional search and accelerate digital growth. Conductor states its current customers include global brands such as SAP, e.l.f Cosmetics, FedEx, and Mastercard.N/A
DemandScience
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
Pricing
ConductorDemandScience
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConductorDemandScience
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ConductorDemandScience
Considered Both Products
Conductor
Chose Conductor
I looked at several other platforms but Conductor won me over by the people I interacted with and their commitment to product updates.
Chose Conductor
We tried Surfer SEO before Conductor. It just felt like it didn't have enough to offer in comparison to Conductor. There was a shortage on everything that you could do in the platform and it felt like the lack of in-depth tools caused us to miss out on making sure our content …
Chose Conductor
I have used SEMRush in the past. I particularly like Conductor because of its versatility and ability to drill down to specifics.
Chose Conductor
We used SEMRush before - but that was hard to scale. Conductor did a better job in that
Chose Conductor
Our company has only used Conductor for the past 2 years.
Chose Conductor
Semrush, Siteimprove, Similarweb, Moz Link Explorer and Screaming Frog SEO Spider
Chose Conductor
Our entire team tested the above and some others I can't recall at this time. They all had their pros and cons. We preferred to go with Conductor because of its ease of use, ease of deployment, and lowered costs.
Chose Conductor
I have used many SEO campaign platforms like Conductor. Conductor UX leads to a good SEO workflow for me. I don't really even understand why. I have used SEMRush a lot, AHrefs an awful lot, and BrightEdge a little, and I love doing SEO analysis in Conductor and spend way more …
Chose Conductor
We didn't use another product previously, we used an agency that did everything for us, so bringing Organic SEO in-house was why we went with Conductor. I have used other products in other roles and at other companies and each has its strengths. Conductor is good for large …
Chose Conductor
We have looked at a few other competitors or other SAAS options but none of them offered the number and quality of tools and resources that Conductor offered especially for the flexible pricing we found with Conductor.
Chose Conductor
We moved to Conductor because the functionality matched what we were looking for. Price was not as much of a factor, thankfully, because Conductor is expensive.
Chose Conductor
We switched to Conductor from Brightedge because the team at Brightedge didn't seem very helpful during our weekly calls, and the platform was tough to use. The features were not laid out in a very logical or user-friendly fashion, and it was often difficult to accomplish even …
Chose Conductor
SEMRush was targeted for the small/medium business and fell short with the number of accounts and projects we needed to run. I feel it also has a cumbersome pricing structure. Botify, albeit an amazing technical auditing tool wasn't the right software for what we need right …
Chose Conductor
My company needed a full end-to-end solution and not just keyword data. Moz wasn't robust enough, and BrightEdge was lacking ease of usability.
Chose Conductor
We used Moz to introduce SEO to the organization. Once we had executive buy-in, the natural next step was to move to an advanced enterprise platform. Conductor offers an easier interface and more options in terms of competitor analysis, reporting, support, research, content …
Chose Conductor
We switched from BrightEdge mainly due to my recommendation based on my past experience with Conductor. The main reason was the advancements in technology that Conductor had demonstrated during our initial conversations. We were certain that the tool simply had more to offer …
Chose Conductor
We were using another company. Do not feel comfortable giving the name but our Conductor Searchlight teams know who it is. We were just left to figure everything out on our own. With Conductor Searchlight, they are always helping.
Chose Conductor
We dealt with an agency that made custom recommendations. Conductor is easier to use, and the recommendations are easier to put into practice. Also, I don't have to wait until the weekly meeting to get answers and insights.
Chose Conductor
We switched to Conductor for several reasons: Explorer is a feature that other tools do not have. It is very helpful to be able to see how your website is working as a whole vs. just the keywords you are tracking. Content research was something that was missing from our …
Chose Conductor
I have been in SEO for over a decade, and in that time, I have used just about every tool on the market. Conductor is the tool we get the most useful insights from in the easiest way. The support and help we get from the Conductor team are one of the main reasons we ignore the …
Chose Conductor
We liked that Conductor offered many different tools in one easier-to-use platform. The price point was right for us. I had experience with other tools but had never used Conductor, and I liked what I saw in the demos we were given. It hasn't disappointed me yet!
DemandScience
Chose DemandScience
Demand Science was less expensive when quoting cost per lead than Tech Target. Other than that, the program sounded almost the same. I selected Demand Science because I was price sensitive while trying to test whether the tactic of content syndication was effective for us.
Chose DemandScience
Mainly in the flexibility of targeting
Chose DemandScience
Demandbase and Demandbase Advertising Cloud
Chose DemandScience
DS has a huge database and therefore lead count within the niche audiences and industries.
Many other lead partners are specialized in one industry. DS is capable of delivering in multiple industries, which is awesome if you target different target audiences as well. There is a …
Chose DemandScience
TechTarget Lead Generation, Madison Logic Platform and Foundry
Chose DemandScience
Over the past year we've utilised a variety of content syndicators, approximately six or seven in total, as we believe in maintaining a diversified mix of suppliers to ensure comprehensive and well-rounded marketing efforts. While all these platforms have their individual …
Chose DemandScience
I've only used DemandScience for content syndication.
Chose DemandScience
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific …
Chose DemandScience
Demand Science has the largest audience in our target groups, which is exactly what we need, as we always require high volumes of leads.
They are also very good when it comes to account management, we always feel that they are there for us, and if we ever have any issue, they …
Chose DemandScience
We have used other media vendors from the likes of Madison Logic, Inbox Insight etc.

However, it has been the direct feedback from the client, great customer service and competitive CPL rates that have influenced our choice.
Chose DemandScience
I would say it is similar to Madison Logic when it comes to the quality of leads and customer service. We are yet to see results coming from GumGum's contextual approach but from a content syndication perspective they are one of the more reliable ones out there, especially for …
Chose DemandScience
We have used Tech Target in the past which is much more expensive than Demand Science but lead quality is the same across both vendors
Chose DemandScience
Similar offering to other content syndication offerings. Of 12 tested partners in the last year, DS ranked 7th in Opportunity Rate and 4th on CPL rate.
Chose DemandScience
DemandScience is a good tool, but doesn't measure up to some other more tech-oriented content syndication players. Taboola is an excellent tool that has a very good user interface to set up the launch and monitor campaigns.
Chose DemandScience
DemandScience is easy to use.
Chose DemandScience
Demand Science's communication skills through email against the ones selected is great! when it comes to getting preview links to go live in the markets they are quick to generate these. As well as getting them amended as per our request, we never have any issues with this …
Chose DemandScience
All vendors have their strengths and weaknesses. Due to the scale of activity we do on behalf of our clients, we tend to always use a basket of vendors to deliver the lead volumes we require. DemandScience is always on the preferred partner list and will thus be considered for …
Chose DemandScience
Again, the main draw to DemandScience was primarily the Scale available across all markets we attempted to target and garner leads from.
Chose DemandScience
Madison Logic Platform, BrightTALK and TechTarget Lead Generation
Chose DemandScience
Good for quality appointment setting, poor against content syndication.
Chose DemandScience
DemandScience is on the more preferred half of vendors due to their negotiated CPLs and willingness to step up to the plate.
Features
ConductorDemandScience
SEO
Comparison of SEO features of Product A and Product B
Conductor
8.7
Ratings
13% above category average
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Keyword analysis9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Backlink management8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
SERP ranking tracking8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Page grader9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Competitive analysis8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Site audit / diagnostics9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Site recommendations7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Task management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO Channels
Comparison of SEO Channels features of Product A and Product B
Conductor
8.8
Ratings
15% above category average
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Local SEO9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Social SEO8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile SEO9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Global SEO8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO Platform & Account Management
Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Product A and Product B
Conductor
9.6
Ratings
13% above category average
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Multi-domain support9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with web analytics tools9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Conductor
-
Ratings
DemandScience
7.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Audience profiling and targeting00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Content performance analytics00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ConductorDemandScience
Small Businesses
Nozzle
Nozzle
Score 10.0 out of 10
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Advanced Web Ranking
Advanced Web Ranking
Score 8.2 out of 10
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Score 8.5 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ConductorDemandScience
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
3.7
(0 ratings)
1.5
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ConductorDemandScience
Likelihood to Recommend
Conductor has proven to be an effective tool for tracking our organic search visibility, researching trends and content topics, and beginning our optimization journey in the new AI-driven world of search. The platform is exceptional for collaboration and is easy to use. Having deeper integration of search-related AI data and tools, organic shopping, schema tracking, and suggestions would further improve an already excellent product offering.
Read full review
DemandScience is great if you are looking for the ability to target very specific titles, roles, companies, etc., and receive high quality leads. They have an incredible scale compared to other partners my team has worked with, but their leads also perform very well down the funnel. This is not always the case because oftentimes, a partner will have room to scale well, but the leads are colder. I'm really impressed with how well DemandScience targets and also with how quickly they respond to me when I have any questions. Recently, my DemandScience rep reached out because he wanted to get our targeting more honed in on our ideal customer. He wanted to work with me to see down-funnel data (where possible and allowed) so that we could create a more targeted campaign. Other partners have never put this kind of time into our partnership.
Read full review
Pros
  • Keyword research (includes related terms, types of terms, high ranking pages, search volume, and more)
  • Content guidance and briefs (you can use built in tools to get specific optimization steps and create content briefs within the tool)
  • Competitor research (compare how competition is ranking and track organic market share)
  • Support (dedicated team support, regular check-ins, built-in requests for deliverables/support items, options for requesting work with partner organizations, excellent training materials, and live chat within the platform)
Read full review
  • Client Service/ Account Management
  • Flexible in terms of reporting and can provide more than one per week
  • Prompt in turning around previews and other client deliverables
  • Competitive pricing and good coverage across EMEA markets and Middle East
  • Access to senior decision makers in the business
Read full review
Cons
  • It is a single host only, which means that if your website spans mulitple subdomains it falls down
  • It isn't as easy to control as desktop crawlers, the continuous nature means you can't just give it a set of URLs to monitor.
  • Some of the issues it highlights aren't always issues, and so you need an expert user
Read full review
  • Management and attention to detail - several items slip through the cracks.
  • Coordination between account management and invoicing has been sloppy.
  • Better intent data to match profiles.
  • Connecting the download to the actual sponsor - often heard, "We never downloaded XYZ."
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Conductor enables high-value SEO activity. There are a lot of moving parts in SEO and I'm always open to products that fit our requirements, but Conductor has built a stronger argument for its value after we subscribed than it had when we subscribed -- that's rare.
Read full review
It works well for lead generation but renewal will depend on the strategy and budget at the point we need to renew to see if it will align.
Read full review
Usability
I check features like the InsightStream every Monday to monitor any major losses or gains in performance. These are easily digested and save me tons of time searching for these insights manually. If there's anything "worth calling home about" I can easily add insights into a workspace and create a report to communicate these results. It's super easy to use Conductor with a team and across departments.
Read full review
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Always works when I've needed it
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Sometimes reports can take some time to load
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
It's been sort of off and on in the 2 years I've used it. The live chat has been really helpful many times, and they're quick to respond. We had different support contacts but they've all been good. I think they've recently changed the way they provide support that I believe will be more dedicated and hands-on
Read full review
The DemandScience Activate CSM team is always helpful and attentive to our organization's needs and goals. We receive thorough attention and detail from the team through regular touch bases and a standard reporting cadence. The team always asks where they can improve, and works to provide insights that matter to our organization and help us to try new things.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Our in house SEO manager trained everyone. It was easy to learn and he was well versed with the product. Any questions we had he was able to answer or reach out to support to find the answer
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I definitely recommend their professional services for getting started. It got our account 90% of the way to where we needed to be in order to gain value from it. In fact, I'd suggest that with few exceptions (such as, you have a staff that is already familiar with the platform and doesn't need any help), the quick start services over the first 30-90 days should be a standard part of onboarding with any new client. It definitely got us to the point of gaining ROI from the solution and, in turn, will make it easier to justify renewal and continued investment in it.
Read full review
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We tried Surfer SEO before Conductor. It just felt like it didn't have enough to offer in comparison to Conductor. There was a shortage on everything that you could do in the platform and it felt like the lack of in-depth tools caused us to miss out on making sure our content that we're putting out is the best it could possibly be.
Read full review
Demand Science was less expensive when quoting cost per lead than Tech Target. Other than that, the program sounded almost the same. I selected Demand Science because I was price sensitive while trying to test whether the tactic of content syndication was effective for us.
Read full review
Scalability
Many features
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The Live Edit feature in Content King has given me the ability to make changes on the fly without having to wait for developer time to make simple edits.
  • I have been able to gain back hours of time that I previously spent on aggregating data across tools when preparing on-the-fly reports for management.
  • Every morning my dashboard provides me with a new insight or answers a question I may not have even thought to ask. This has added to my workload, but it's also helped to become better at my job.
Read full review
  • Delivered quality leads that had engaged with our top of funnel content
  • Added quality contacts to our marketing database
  • Cost per lead slightly higher than some other vendors
  • Quick to set up, launch and deliver the campaign once everything in place
  • Excellent account management and named-person support
Read full review
ScreenShots

Conductor Screenshots

Screenshot of Conductor's AI search performance metrics. Conductor helps to ensure a brand appears everywhere audience searches—from ChatGPT and Perplexity to Google AIO and AI Mode.Screenshot of website performance analytics that tie AI and search performance together and create visibility into how search impacts business goals. Viewers can analyze AI traffic alongside engagement and conversion metrics.Screenshot of an example of the available competitive intelligence. Viewers can analyze the competition's strategy and compare market share in both AI and traditional search to identify opportunities.Screenshot of the AI Topic Map, used to automate content strategy. As AI generation becomes a commodity, knowing what content to create becomes an competitive advantage. The AI Topic Map can be used to spot where to create or optimize content for the biggest impact.Screenshot of the AI Writing Assistant. The Writing Assistant orchestrates personalized content that fuses brand guidelines, competitors, knowledge sources, and real-time search insights to produce content that’s strategically designed to win with audiences and AI answer engines.Screenshot of AI Bot Crawling Analysis, used to find and fix the errors that make a site invisible to AI. Viewers can diagnose the technical errors that make the best pages invisible to LLMs. This dashboard transforms complex server logs into a simple workflow where viewers can monitor crawl frequency, optimize the crawl budget, and ensure that a brand's most valuable content is discoverable.