Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Score9.1 out of 10
N/A
Based on the former Coremetrics, IBM Digital Analytics is a discontinued analytics product. IBM acquired Coremetrics in 2010, and re-branded the platform to the IBM Digital Marketing Optimization Solution. Product support was ultimately provided by Acoustic, but the product is not a part of the company's plans going forward.
N/A
Usabilla (discontinued)
Score5.6 out of 10
N/A
Usabilla was a web and app survey tool, developed by the Amsterdam company of the same name, and acquired by SurveyMonkey in March of 2019. The product is no longer available.
$49
per month
Pricing
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Usabilla (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Usabilla (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Usabilla (discontinued)
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and Usabilla (discontinued)
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Usabilla (discontinued)
8.0
4 Ratings
1% below category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
7.94 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and Usabilla (discontinued)
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Usabilla (discontinued)
8.6
4 Ratings
1% above category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
7.94 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
7.94 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and Usabilla (discontinued)
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Usabilla (discontinued)
6.9
4 Ratings
19% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
6.94 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and Usabilla (discontinued)
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Usabilla (discontinued)
5.8
4 Ratings
33% below category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
5.54 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
5.54 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
5.52 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
5.54 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and Usabilla (discontinued)
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Usabilla (discontinued)
7.4
4 Ratings
16% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
7.44 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
7.44 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and Usabilla (discontinued)
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Usabilla (discontinued)
8.4
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Vendor-offered crowdsourcing
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Respondent restrictions
00 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Usabilla (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Discontinued Products
IBM analytics has continued to improve upon the days of being the original core metrics. After using the updated version for quite some time, it has been great at providing the needed analytics to measure ROI and goal performance for our quarterly KPI's. It has resulted in a great increase in web engagements although we are a midsize company, smaller outfits may not need such an expensive option.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If we could select 0/10 we would... We would not recommend anyone using this product as it excludes a very important user group, disabled users. If you use this product you will be failing ADA and WCAG 2.1 (EU Directive for public sector websites and mobile apps). In my opinion, you will be vulnerable to lawsuits.
IBM CXA comprises an acquisition called Tealeaf. This tool has deep heritage and this is evident in its present-day capabilities.
The Universal Behaviour Exchange or UBX puts the concept of personalisation at the forefront. The ability to combine physical (analog) and digital transactions to create the complete picture of a customer journey, is a stand out benefit.
The solution does not have to involve the purchase of software. IBM CXA can be sold as a service bundled with analytics as a service. This not only lowers the cost of ownership, it gets around one of the principal issues. Strong staff with design and analytical capability to drive the solution and deliver tangible benefits.
The seamless integration of Watson AI services to help with the heavy lifiting. Watson reinforces the analytical focus this solution has and can learn to recognise situations specific to a company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The user interface is in Flash, which can be very frustrating and slow at times. Apparently, this is to be transitioned in a future release.
Can only segment the last 93 days of data. Any historical segmentation beyond the 93 days must be run in Explore (which is credit based, and has its own limitations with the number of credits per month, based on the initial contract with IBM).
Reports can only display 93 days of data at a given time for custom date ranges. There are pre-programmed date ranges setup with IBM during implementation (last week, last month, last quarter etc.), but are not flexible enough to answer more specific questions.
Certain reports cannot have segments applied, making answering some simple questions a bit more tricky. For example, I can create a segment around mobile devices and apply it to the marketing channels report, but I can't create a marketing channel segment and apply it to the mobile reports.
Built in API calls allows for nice report design and automation.
Styling and positioning of the 'Feedback' button could be improved with more options provided. Right now it seems very basic.
Triggered surveys and popups would also benefit for more styling and control over how the survey is presented to users. Sometimes it can be hard to match your brand to the out-of-box options available. I've seen more flexible versions of this in other providers.
Notifications of negative feedback (delivered via email) could be improved. We like to try and take immediate action and the notifications haven't always made this possible. I'd also like to see more notification options added to triggered campaigns and surveys.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IBM Digital Analytics is a great solution for our clients and I believe they offer the best solution for the retail space. We have access to IBM support via email or live chat and they can answer many of the reporting questions that come up. IBM is receptive to our feedback of the product so I am confident they will continue making improvements
The interface to configure the questionary is quite easy to use. It helps to give autonomy to marketing teams. Once the initial setup is made (integrating a basic javascript code on your website), you can easily deploy any questionary on any page of your website. Usabilla is a very flexible tool overall.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As reports are templated, the system is pretty quick. Sometimes you have to wait a bit for a report to render. Or you might have to re-load the page. But there is no real issue here and the system is on par with other similar systems.
Overall, the level of support is very good and I would say it is a strong asset of the solution. However, you can sometimes feel that there is a difference of level among the support team.
If we could select 0/10 we would... If Usabilla were to fix their accessibility issues we would consider keeping our subscription to them, but as it stands this does not seem possible as Usabilla does not seem interested in making the platform accessible.
Online training is really great. One of the best assets that they have. Lots of great videos, pop quizzes at the end of each module. Fantastic. Other tools have similar features, but not as good.
Much of the work we did in IBM Digital Analytics could have been answered through Google Analytics, a much simpler, agile and FREE solution set. Not mention, given the vast number of Google Analytics USERS, free and actionable support is simply a click away ... this compared to IBM Digital Analytics fractured and often absent support service.
I have Hotjar, Sprig, and Usabilla in my workplace. Usabilla unfortunately has the most limited feature set of the 3 options. The difficulty of administering a Usabilla survey on mobile is a big blocker for my projects. Sprig and Hotjar both allow mobile and allow video recordings (either of a user's screen or a user's webcam for impromptu interviews).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This solution can support large amount of data and transaction. The way that user management features are built, it shows it is meant for large organizations.
We spend too much time trying to work around bugs on the new UI.
We spend too much time trying to figure out how to make certain segments work because support and the knowledge center are lackluster.
Our sales rep is very unresponsive and leaves us searching for a lot of answers on our own, including what other products we may benefit from that IBM offers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info