Cornerstone Galaxy is a cloud-based application for talent management. Cornerstone offers suites for recruiting, training, performance monitoring and planning, learning, and HR data management. It is scaled for enterprises.
N/A
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Object Storage is an IBM Cloud product in the endpoint backup and IaaS categories. It is commonly used for data archiving and backup, for web and mobile applications, and as scalable, persistent storage for analytics.
$0
per month
Pricing
Cornerstone Galaxy
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
One-Rate Plan
As low as USD $12/TB a month
per month
Standard Plan
Free up to 5GB—no minimum fee, pay only for what you use
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cornerstone Galaxy
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
Optional
Additional Details
—
The One-Rate and Standard service plans for Cloud Object Storage include resiliency options, flexible data classes and built-in security. Pricing is based on the choice of location, storage class and resiliency choice.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cornerstone Galaxy
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Features
Cornerstone Galaxy
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
6.5
134 Ratings
11% below category average
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
New hire portal
7.569 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
5.7116 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
6.4127 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
8.4
115 Ratings
14% above category average
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
8.596 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
8.099 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.0107 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.595 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
9.0110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
8.5
122 Ratings
21% above category average
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
Performance plans
8.594 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
8.581 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
9.070 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
9.082 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
9.097 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
8.064 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
8.094 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
9.086 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.083 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.3116 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
6.5
58 Ratings
4% below category average
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
6.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
5.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
8.052 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
7.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
5.8
67 Ratings
20% below category average
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
7.045 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
8.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
9.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
9.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
8.040 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
5.043 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
5.040 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
6.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
6.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
4.036 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
5.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
4.560 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
3.061 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
3.556 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
3.564 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
7.4
191 Ratings
5% above category average
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
Course authoring
7.7141 Ratings
00 Ratings
Course catalog or library
7.4189 Ratings
00 Ratings
Player/Portal
8.0176 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning content
7.2151 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile friendly
6.5138 Ratings
00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
6.0172 Ratings
00 Ratings
Assignments
8.0185 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance management
7.8166 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning administration
8.0188 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
7.6187 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social learning
6.7119 Ratings
00 Ratings
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy is a good solution for larger companies that focus on training and want to offer a variety of options to their employees and departments. It is highly customizable. It does require a tech savvy team to set-up, and maintain. This is not a set-it-and-forget-it system. From an LMS perspective, it wouldn't be my top choice for employees who only need a mobile-friendly approach.
In my experience, IBM Cloud Object Storage is well suited for projects like the one I am working on. This includes the use of natural language classification and the uploading of data to train a machine learning model for tag suggestions based on a body of text. Using IBM Cloud Object Storage has helped with this greatly. IBM Cloud Object Storage has also been great for Big Data Analytics thanks to its scalablilty and ease of use for large datasets. Alongside IBM Watson and our team's internal big data tools we've managed to process and analyze data more efficiently, leading to key insights that have driven business value for our clients.
Ability to provide multiple customizable access roles from general end user to full system admin and anything in between
Powerful reporting system in the LMS to track a plethora of data points within the platform (user data, training information, transcript information)
Great options to customize the look and feel of your "home page" to best meet your company's needs and goals.
Ability to customize the transcript view for learners (i.e. when Completed training will move to their Archived transcript, what to do with Inactive training on transcripts)
IBM Cloud Object Storage is an excellent choice for disaster recovery and backup solutions. Its high durability and geographic redundancy ensure that our backup data is safe and can be quickly restored in case of a disaster. This capability is crucial for maintaining our business continuity and minimizing downtime. We have deployed our loads in an IKS cluster distributed in 3 different AZs with stateful data allocated in COS.
We have a video streaming application and need to store and deliver a vast library of video content to millions of users worldwide, so we store our data in COS, which is cheap and reliable.
We have a bunch of data that must be analyzed and stored in datasets for fraud detection, risk management, and customer insights. In these cases, this data is moved from Onprem to IBM Cloud so we can use cheap storage like COS.
Sometimes finding the right answer to your support question can be a bit more difficult than it should be.
I would like to see more OSHA related courses.
At times, the administrative interface seems to need to be updated, but the tradeoff honestly might be the absolute rock-solid stability of the platform.
Searching and retrieving—full-text search or metadata search—is one of the significant areas of improvement. It isn't easy to search for data with this.
Integration with other IBM cloud services is trickier. For example, integrating this with API Connect to access the data from API will be difficult for users.
Support - I think you should have more support community.
As long as pricing stays reasonable, we will likely stay with Cornerstone for at least one more contract renewal. It would be a large task to migrate all of our content to a new system. However, the LMS landscape is diversifying with new startups that are showing some real innovation.
Easy to use, easy to learn, lots of support during the learning process. There are a few parts of the system we don't use and I'm hesitant to begin using because other clients have said they're difficult and cumbersome (certifications) or outdated (libraries)
For my use cases, it has been a very smooth experience. Even my new colleagues have been able to get on top of things very quickly. This shows how easy it is to work with
I haven't really had any major availability problems. The service is practically impeccable but it is true that at times, due to server and latency problems, the application has been slower. But these have been specific issues that have resolved themselves.
We rarely face downtime or access issues with IBM Cloud Object Storage. It’s mostly available when we need it, even during peak hours or heavy data loads.
I haven't seen many issues at all with load times. Sometimes learning assignments will take longer then expected but it is still reasonable. They have taken great effort over the last couple years to speed things up like reports and search results so I expect that effort to continue in the coming year.
I would give it a 9 because it works smooth with our AI and analytics tools, no major slowdown. Pages and dashboards load fine most of the time, and reports finish in decent time even when data is heavy.
Its always important to have support when you are facing problems and when you are the main admin of the organization. Cornerstone Support is very supporting when you have not found the answer in the help guide. its very useful to have a team support to guide you.
I have been working in IT sector for more than 15 years. I have worked with various vendors. IBM's sales team, support team have been really helpful. After we start to use their product, their UX design team also contacted us to get feedback from us. They are really interested about our experience.
we use also to admin all our training in person events and sessions. Its easy to admin this kind of trainings and automatize some processes we have. Also de user experience and the integration with other systems helps to the employees to use more. All modules integrated oriented to develop people is the principal reason to have CSOD. The training administration is very complete and allows to automate many processes.
The online modules are pretty good. You can access them at any time, which we have done. You learn a lot in the beginning, but having the ability to retake short lessons when you are working on those items was very helpful.
I just researching and applying the tools on their platforms to ensure a good learning path, based on my needs. Reading the documentation related with resources, tools. Is too big, but I am trying to know more about it every day. It is a good way to know more about their resources. A new way to attract new customers. At the end of the day, we are all involved in improvement and automation of our tasks and resources for customers and end-users.
The implementation was pretty difficult. We felt they (Cornerstone) didn’t properly allocate the resources to complete our implementation in the timetable we wanted.
For example, we worked on Workday and SSO integrations - work that we had specifically contracted for in advance. When we were ready to work on that project, they didn’t have the people ready to help us, so it took a lot longer than necessary. That was my biggest pain point.
The implementation approach we went with was a self-led implementation. We would speak to the implementation manager once per week, and self-trained. We met with implementation manager to discuss issues, review things that we’d learned for 1 hour. We found that wasn’t enough. Other things would come up outside that one hour window that we couldn’t get answers to. We didn’t have anyone to ask about those things and we had to wait to ask during our weekly meeting.
The advantage of the self-led implementation approach was that it was really inexpensive – significantly less than the implementation cost for the other systems that we looked at. I also liked that we could pace ourselves. There were however big roadblocks. We would have to make sure the right resources were available. We had an implementation/project manager with a lot of experience and felt that the person was knowledgeable but missed on a few things.
In hindsight, I would still go with the self-led implementation, but knowing what I know now, I would ask for the integration person to be available more. I would work that into the contract. With single sign-on, we needed deep linking to build direct links through a Single Sign-On tool, e.g. when someone gets an email, it directs them to training. But it has to go through SSO to get them to the correct link. Deep linking wasn’t turned on in our system and they had to activate it. We encountered little things like that – sequencing pre-requisites which were problematic. We tried to troubleshoot ourselves.
I recommend you consider contracting for some extra implementation hours and determine when they are going to be available. Work it into the contract that you have the ability to call tech support during implementation. In addition to weekly implementation meetings, they have technical webexes – 4 every week, but 2 didn’t apply to us – one as we were using SSO. The challenge is they were not always relevant – we had specific questions that didn’t fall into those categories
Yes Our organization used IBM professional services to implement IBM object storage because of its data consistency and multiple way to upload and download data and its encryption security features. Also that its brand matter for the any organization to secure the layer and storage. It sis also verify that application and system are compatibale for this product
The user experience is a lot better than using SumTotal as an admin CSOD makes working easy. Without having workarounds. Reporting is a lot better than both platforms. Reporting in CSOD is complex however easy to manage and create when you understand the data points collected
Amazon S3 is a great service to safely back up your data where redundancy is guaranteed, and the cost is fair. In the past I have used Amazon S3 for data that we backup and hope we never need to access, but in the case of a catastrophic or even small slip of the finger with the delete command, we know our data and our client's data is safely backed up by Amazon S3. Amazon S3 service is a good option, but based on the features it provides compared with IBM Cloud Object Storage, it is less suitable. IBM Cloud Object Storage is also integrated with more services, like IBM Cloud SQL and IBM Aspera, which AWS does not provide to transfer files at maximum speed in the world.
It is important to be familiar with the terms and annual increases in licenses and other aspects of the contract. I recommend analyzing this from the beginning and the permanence is relevant because Cornerstone updates its modules and brings out new features that may allow you to leave a module to acquire another
Scaling up the number of users can lead to significant increases in licensing costs, which, while not a technical limitation, can be a practical constraint for some organizations
As I have said before, I have no doubt that the services of the Cornerstone sales people were very good. In particular, our salesperson spent a lot of time in contact with us to make the process go smoothly. Perhaps being a large company in some cases the times were slowed down but it is something normal to take into account.
This allows us to recommend a platform to our clients that will quickly help them create new, efficient business processes with very little development.
This saves clients hours and days of manual analysis of images, allowing the system to do the work when attaching Object Storage to models.
There is a learning curve in utilizing the storage and the modeling, but once up and running, it works well during deployment.