Countly vs. Singular

Whether you're planning to include it into a website or a mobile application, this arrangement is simple to implement. The best feature has to be its superb "division," which allows you to delve deeper into your data without using SQL-like queries. On Ubuntu, the free "group version" can act organically aided.

Incentivized

Singular is perfect for companies that have limited BI developer resources. If you work with more than a few media partners, Singular aggregates all pre-install metrics and automatically connects it to your BI data / MMP provider. This use is perfect for executives/directors that want to have a quick snapshot of their marketing spend. Singular also works well for media buyers that want to export Singular report as a base for creating optimization reports.

Incentivized

• Open-source and Self-hosted - Countly can be completely self-hosted, which makes it really easy to offset costs of a competing service like Segment or Mixpanel for early-stage companies.
• A large number of SDKs and platform support - Countly provides fairly comprehensive support for mobile applications and general tracking. As a result, it's pretty easy to create comprehensive tracking of events for any company.
• Custom queries, access to data - You have instant access to data and extensive customizability which makes this platform fairly easy to use for any purpose of user and market tracking.

Incentivized

• Creative reporting is one of the features of Singular (formerly Apsalar), which I love the most.
• Tracking the user journey right from the click to purchase.

Incentivized

• No specific thing in mind. All is good except sometimes the customer service lags a little when you have problems setting up the tool.

Incentivized

• Providing a clear solution to cross-device attribution and measurement: no vendor does this well currently.
• Ability to toggle advanced attribution models: first-last touch, time decay, etc.
• Comprehensive deep linking solution (similar to Branch).

Incentivized

Countly practically does everything you need it to do. However, it can have challenges of its own sometimes.

Incentivized

When we report about a bug or a problem the support usually responds quickly and try to provide a solution/fix in a timely manner. I wish that they had a monitoring tool to notify me about bugs before I spot them myself.

Incentivized

Countly have two main elements that make it the better option. First is open sourced so you can edit with code new options and new events, also you can use a variety of plugins depending of the necessities of the users and the objectives of every analysis. The second characteristic is that is very easy to use and even if is open source and the code could seem complex everything is very intuitive.

Incentivized

As this is my first job after completing my graduation, therefore I do not have any prior experience of working with corporates and organizations. Hence I have only used Singular (formerly Apsalar).

Incentivized

• Allowed me to understand my customer on a deeper level
• Allowed me to tweak my content and sales pages
• Allowed me to better understand my target market.

Incentivized

• Reduced time to manage reporting on a daily basis—going from weekly reporting to daily cadence.
• Ability to manage and optimize creative performance, allowing us to test and react to performance quickly.
• Reduced error rate (and therefore troubleshooting) of reporting.

Incentivized