Salesforce launched Data.com in 2011, in partnership with D&B, but has since decided to gradually sunset the platform. Data.com offered a store of company and customer data for use in sales and prospecting.
N/A
HeyReach
Score9.2 out of 10
N/A
HeyReach is an automated LinkedIn outreach tool, used to automate 10+ step sequences using connection requests, messages, follow-ups, InMails, likes, and voice-notes. Outreach sequences can be customized with its workflow builder, and includes steps like automatic invites, messages, follow-ups, InMails, and like posting.
$79
per month per seat
Pricing
Data.com (discontinued)
HeyReach
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Per LinkedIn Seat
$79
per month per seat
Special Agency Offer
$799
per month up to 50 accounts & 5 workspaces
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Data.com (discontinued)
HeyReach
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Data.com (discontinued)
HeyReach
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Data.com (discontinued) and HeyReach
Feature
Data.com (discontinued)
6.9
25 Ratings
11% below category average
HeyReach
-
Ratings
Advanced search
6.523 Ratings
00 Ratings
Identification of new leads
7.623 Ratings
00 Ratings
List quality
7.424 Ratings
00 Ratings
List upload/download
7.124 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting
6.422 Ratings
00 Ratings
Load time/data access
6.425 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Data.com (discontinued) and HeyReach
Feature
Data.com (discontinued)
7.8
24 Ratings
1% above category average
HeyReach
-
Ratings
Contact information
7.924 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company information
7.424 Ratings
00 Ratings
Industry information
8.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Data.com (discontinued) and HeyReach
Feature
Data.com (discontinued)
7.0
25 Ratings
6% below category average
HeyReach
-
Ratings
Lead qualification process
8.917 Ratings
00 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations
6.713 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salesforce integration
7.222 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company/business profiles
7.422 Ratings
00 Ratings
Alerts and reminders
6.114 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data hygiene
5.623 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic data refresh
7.114 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tags
6.913 Ratings
00 Ratings
Filters and segmentation
6.824 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Data.com (discontinued) and HeyReach
Feature
Data.com (discontinued)
7.6
10 Ratings
2% above category average
HeyReach
-
Ratings
Sales email templates
7.36 Ratings
00 Ratings
Append emails to records
7.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Data.com (discontinued) and HeyReach
Feature
Data.com (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HeyReach
7.6
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Automated follow-ups
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Lead segmentation and distribution
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Lead Management Integrations
Comparison of Lead Management Integrations features of Data.com (discontinued) and HeyReach
Feature
Data.com (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HeyReach
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Integrations with CRMs
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Integrations with data storage tools
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Integrations with lead automation tools
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Conversion Rate Optimization
Comparison of Conversion Rate Optimization features of Data.com (discontinued) and HeyReach
Feature
Data.com (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HeyReach
8.5
2 Ratings
2% above category average
KPI analytics
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Drop-off analytics
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
A/B tests
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Form Building
Comparison of Form Building features of Data.com (discontinued) and HeyReach
There are many scenarios that make data.com well suited, but most specifically, it works very well when looking for contacts within a certain zip code. You can sort and find information about these contacts and pay by points. This helps because you are able to pick and choose which you want to pay for.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We use it for all of our LinkedIn outbound internally, and it only takes one employee to oversee. We have 5 senders, so something that would have previously taken a lot of coordination and education (writing SOPs, training the rest of the team, overseeing that they follow the process daily/weekly/monthly, etc.) is now handled by one person in a few hours every week. If you compare it to legacy, enterprise tools–it's a no brainer. For a fraction of the cost, you are getting the same (or significantly more) value and features, no complicated annual contract that ties you down. Not to mention that they have incredible customer service and content. I habitually speak with the founding team, have asked for features and then seen them in the product within days/weeks. You can't get that at any of the competitors.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Data.com is a great way to find out accurate revenue and employee numbers for companies across various industries.
Data.com's filtering capabilities allow our team to quickly find the ideal prospects to reach out to.
Data.com, being owned by Salesforce, allows for a seamless integration into our CRM. This saves us an incredible amount of time and ensures data accuracy.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Some contacts can be old. Perhaps they could consider validating some that are older than 5 years.
They don't always detect duplicate companies. For example, I've added the same company twice before, I don't understand how they allow that, or prevent others from adding duplicates. It doesn't happen very often,, only occasionally.
Sometimes data.com will "autocorrect" a job title incorrectly. For example, entering "Director of People & Culture" will autocorrect it to "Director of peopleandculture" If you don't catch it, it looks pretty bad for the next person who wants to view the contact.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Very intuitive to use and I've never had any confusion with features. Anyone can create an account and use the platform simply by adding a contact or company into the database to earn points. It's a great option if you don't have budget for lists or pay services. It is easy to use and anyone can benefit from it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is a very good tool especially the way they are improving themselves, as I have been using this platform before they even launched properly, & they are giving the requested features as well. The only thing is that as they scale, they need to have a better customer support team to handle the issues
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Whenever I've had a question their support has responded pretty quickly and gives me exactly what I am looking for. I have not had any technical issues so I can't speak to issues there, but as far as general questions from a free user they have impressed me with how quickly they get back to me and the thoroughness of their answers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Adobe Workfront may not be the direct competitor of Data.com, but for the services I was using, Workfront looked a little better when it comes to the user interface. But Data.com definitely had more powerful features & better integration capabilities. Also, it was easier to play around with the customer journey in Data.com as compared to other tools I have used in the past.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Many of the competitors aren't listed in TrustRadius. But there are dozens more. They are either very enterprise or quite new (small challenger companies). HeyReach makes the enterprise options look wildly pricey and unreasonable, and they stand out from the other challengers by their approach, content, and roadmap. I've used so many tools and HeyReach has definitely made its way into our standard rotation.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info