Datadog vs. RackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued) vs. Securonix Next-Generation SIEM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Datadog
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Datadog is a monitoring service for IT, Dev and Ops teams who write and run applications at scale, and want to turn the massive amounts of data produced by their apps, tools and services into actionable insight.
$1.27
per month (billed annually) per host
RackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)
Score 1.4 out of 10
N/A
RackFoundry was a firewall solution with VPN, SIEM, automated vulnerability scanning and log management features scaled for SME’s. It has been discontinued and is no longer available.N/A
Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Securonix headquartered in Addison offers the Securonix Next-Generation SIEM deployment, combining log management as well as user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA), for a complete SOC solution.N/A
Pricing
DatadogRackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Editions & Modules
Log Management
$1.27
per month (billed annually) per host
Infrastructure
$15.00
per month (billed annually) per host
Standard
$18
per month per host
Enterprise
$27
per month per host
DevSecOps Pro
$27
per month per host
APM
$31.00
per month (billed annually) per host
DevSecOps Enterprise
$41
per month per host
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DatadogRackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing. Multi-Year/Volume discounts available (500+ hosts/mo).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DatadogRackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Considered Multiple Products
Datadog
Chose Datadog
Its the Enterprise level decision, definitely usability and features perspective Datadog is much more advanced.
Chose Datadog
Datadog is significantly more user-friendly than CloudWatch.In terms of capabilities, they're similar.
I would not call either of the best-in-class for any single feature, but Datadog feels more polished and ready to use overall.Multi-cloud monitoring is a clear differentiator …
Chose Datadog
Datadog dashboard is very intuitive and offer seamless integration into multi-cloud platform compared to its competitor.
Chose Datadog
I use Datadog because it concentrates all these features into a single tool, facilitating the learning curve that my platform and development engineering team needs in order to be able to set up the monitors/alerts/SLIs/SLOs as well as to diagnose a production issue. Its easier …
Chose Datadog
Datadog seems to be the most feature-rich of all the alternatives we've considered, however due to problems outlined earlier, some of the others have benefits. OpenTel can give us a way to make our platforms compatible with a variety of vendors, and can be done without …
Chose Datadog
Datadog is a more complex but complete solution than any of the other Log Aggregation, monitoring, or general observabilty tools that we have trialed. I found it easier to setup following useful and up-to-date documentation provided directly by Datadog instead of scattered …
Chose Datadog
Kibana
Datadog
… because within our usecase we have all the events in kibana but sampled traces in Datadog … but if we had all the traces it would have been much more useful
Chose Datadog
I think Datadog and sentry serve different needs. I like sentry to keep track of errors on our systems. And then I'll jump into Datadog to investigate those issues.
Chose Datadog
We have utilized a SIEM in the past, but it was a very manual process to set it up. Content packs make it very easy to set up and get alerting instantly. Datadog takes out a lot of headaches for our security team, since they no longer have to create custom alerts for every …
Chose Datadog
First think first - it's easy to use, and very easy to implement in any infrastructure. It provides a custom dashboard and monitors. I’ve used or evaluated Grafana, Prometheus, Amazon CloudWatch, and Dynatrace, and each tool has strong capabilities. Prometheus + Grafana provide …
Chose Datadog
Wavefront seems to be better at observability and allows more custom query language.
Chose Datadog
All other tools dont have all the features which Datadog provides.
Easy to use from UI where other may have complicated UI or no UI at all to create monitors. Consider like AWS grafana, we have limitation to create monitors from UI. There is no recurring downtime for monitors. …
Chose Datadog
UI of the Datadog is easy to understand and integration steps are easy to understand. It also provides the troubleshooting steps which are easy to understand. Supports multi cloud integrations which is very important for all the customers to know about the cloud service's …
Chose Datadog
we primarily use Kubernetes, and Prometheus is great for collecting time series metrics, especially in Kubernetes. and Grafana is used for dashboards. As these are open source, we host them and manage them internally. We choose Datadog because of its logs, traces, and …
Chose Datadog
I selected Datadog because of its features and the wide range of integration support. As I already told it supports more that 600+ integrations which helps and organization to keep everything in a single place and also its AI feature which is reducing the time for root cause …
Chose Datadog
1. Grafana is good, but a lot of integration is required for it to work. .that not the case of Datadog
2. Faster to set up Datadog instead of Grafana
3. Alerting in Datadog feels much easier thanin Grafana.
Chose Datadog
Datadog is best for cloud-native and fast-setup. It is more mature for infrastructure and real-time observability. The UI is more user-friendly and provides wide coverage of app insights.
Chose Datadog
I have tried and used a number of other tools similar to Datadog such as New Relic, Splunk, Prometheus, AWS cloudwatch and Dynatrace. New Relic and Splunk provide excellent monitoring and analytics, but Datadog’s consolidated dashboards and ease of setup combined with a wealth …
Chose Datadog
Our logs are very important, and Datadog manages them exceptionally well. We frequently use Datadog services for our investigations. Use case: Monitor your apps, infrastructure, APIs, and user experience.
Chose Datadog
ease of use and implementation, other than new relic (which I think is terrible in every possible way), the other two support opentelemetry better, have more manageable costs and comparable basic services, but they do not have the breadt of services dd does.
Chose Datadog
We moved to Datadog from Microsoft's Application Insights. Application Insights did a fine job in allowing us to view our application data, but it lacked the holistic view of all our infrastructure and other platforms that could not use Application Insights. Being able to …
Chose Datadog
In terms of usability, I’ve found Datadog significantly more approachable and powerful compared to Elasticsearch, especially for day-to-day operational monitoring. Datadog offers a much more cohesive, user-friendly interface out of the box, with built-in support for metrics, …
RackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)
Chose RackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)
We choose Rackfoundry because it was supposed to be a budget friendly solution that punched above its weight class. Instead what we got was a virtual appliance that powers a web app that does not work.
Chose RackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)
There are a few reasons we chose Rack Foundry:

1. At the end of the day cost is a huge concern for a small company. With that being said we had a great sales person who walked us through all the offerings and basically worked with us to get us to be in a position where we can …
Chose RackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)
Well I have experience with the big names: SecureWorks, IBM and Splunk. Individually their logging tools are much better than RackFoundry's Total Security Management. This is great for large corporations and urban cities, however not so great for municipalities, mid size …
Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Features
DatadogRackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Datadog
-
Ratings
RackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)
1.0
Ratings
155% below category average
Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
9.9
Ratings
23% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings1.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings1.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings1.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings1.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings1.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings1.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings1.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DatadogRackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Small Businesses
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Score 7.7 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 8.0 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DatadogRackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DatadogRackFoundry Total Security Management (discontinued)Securonix Next-Generation SIEM
Likelihood to Recommend
Datadog works really well with complex microservices architecture like any E-commerce platform which will be having multiple services but they all are interdependent to others so in this scenario Datadog will be best to monitor these as it will show the transactions also between those microservices. If you are using multiple services in your architecture whether it will be cloud services or on prem services Datadog will be the best choice to monitor all those service with in Datadog so that you can see everything in a single place. But if you are having small architecture and few services in that then in that scenario you can use Datadog but it will be little costly as compared to other but obviously the features are very well.
Read full review
I would not recommend RackFoundry to any company whatsoever. At first it seems like a viable solution for the cost. Offering SOC monitoring, implementation and deployment all-in-one seems like a great deal. However it all falls apart when push comes to shoves. As it currently stands we are just over a year into our deployment. All we have to show for it is a fancy web app that does not display any information. In the year that this deployment has been ongoing it has taken us a few months just to get the virtual appliance installed. Then it was another few months of back and forth until we finally got credentials. Then when I finally logged in we began the process of deploying agents and began collecting data. Shortly afterward things began to stall to where they are now. We faced major issues with the web app, scans were not running, assets were not reporting in and data and reports were not being generated. After doing some more research and googling I realized that we were not alone with these issues. Countless other reports from companies who have had similar issues to ours. Each time I ask when the issues were going to be resolved, I got the same answer every time: "The next release should fix the issues you have been experiencing", only for the next release to come, and the issues remain.
Read full review
The best part of Securonix is it's architecture which makes it scalable and allows it to add any new feature to match the requirement. Securonix is well suited for enterprises who are mid to large size and are looking for a quick time to value, do not want to put upfront capex and invest less on the service layer. It becomes little costly for a small sized organisation.
Read full review
Pros
  • Create Dashboards as per application, environments, and Custom metrics in one panel.
  • Log aggregation, one-stop Application monitoring tools for the whole infrastructure.
  • Playbooks, SLA definition, success and error quotas, request visualizations.
  • DB monitoring, Serverless stack monitoring.
  • Alerting of Production incidents so we can quickly resolve the issues on time.
Read full review
  • All-in-one solution that covers all the essentials and basic of security needs
  • Unique methodology way for cost effective enterprise security solution
  • Help exceed compliance as their interface allows you to tailor your compliance needs
  • Simple and friendly customizable user interface dashboard
  • Unique function: Ask an Expert
  • Premium fully manage automatic updates with access
  • Deployable Security Modules that encompass IPS/IDS/SIEM/VA/FW
  • Knowledgeable engineers, who helped improve our overall infrastructure by making it more secure
Read full review
  • Collect data from just about any log source.
  • Provides lightning fast searching across large data-sets.
  • Provides in-depth analytics across both micro and macro time frames using threat models.
Read full review
Cons
  • Alert windows cause lag in notifications (e.g. if the alert window is X errors in 1 hour, we won't get alerted until the end of the 1 hour range)
  • I would appreciate more supportive examples for how to filter and view metrics in the explorer
  • I would like a more clear interface for metrics that are missing in a time frame, rather than only showing tags/etc. for metrics that were collected within the currently viewed time frame
Read full review
  • Product they offer does not work.
  • Time to implement is unbelievably long.
  • Services they offer are so far, non-existent.
Read full review
  • There is a steep learning curve for the platform.
  • Developing your own analytics can be challenging due to the depth and complexity of the analytics engine.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Definitely will not revisit after our issues and, in my opinion, poor support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Usability
There is some room for improvement, but the Datadog team sends out updates frequently, and the UI is user-friendly for engineers, with no significant loading issues or region-specific problems. That was one of the key reasons we preferred Datadog; our company has employees worldwide, and it wasn't difficult to transition to the tool.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Securonix Next-Generation SIEM provides loads of features that can be utilized as per business requirements. With the Securonix Jupyter update, the feature set is fine tuned for efficient implementation. The SOAR platform will complete the product for automated response on top of the alerting capabilities. The primary factor for selecting a SIEM will include the support model. While implementing and currently using Securonix Next-Generation SIEM in our environment, we have experienced the best support provided by the SIEM team in all aspects.
Read full review
Support Rating
The support team usually gets it right. We did have a rather complicate issue setting up monitoring on a domain controller. However, they are usually responsive and helpful over chat. The downside would be I don’t think they have any phone support. If that is important to you this might not be a good fit.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Securonix acts with urgency to support day to day operational issues & queries and shows a real commitment to us as a partner. I rate this an 8 because there are still some bumps in the road, instances where communications can be sparse or unclear.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Documentation was difficult to work through, rollout was catastrophic (completely outage)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Datadog is a more complex but complete solution than any of the other Log Aggregation, monitoring, or general observabilty tools that we have trialed. I found it easier to setup following useful and up-to-date documentation provided directly by Datadog instead of scattered around many blogs or articles. I would love to have my own Grafana + Prometheus expert to setup all the peices we need but you're paying for expertise there instead of an experience with Datadog.
Read full review
Well I have experience with the big names: SecureWorks, IBM and Splunk. Individually their logging tools are much better than RackFoundry's Total Security Management. This is great for large corporations and urban cities, however not so great for municipalities, mid size businesses and companies who fluctuate between 1-7 members on their IT staff. Why? Because it takes too much of their resources and integration with other products gets a little rough as you will need to configure your preferences to theirs. When a company has stability it is great to have a name brand product, however renewals and upgrade costs can be taxing to an organization.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Saved us (time & money) from developing our own monitoring utilities that would pale in comparison
  • Alerts allow us to remedy issues before our customers even know about them
  • Tracking resource usage over time allows us to better plan for future needs, before it becomes a pain-point.
Read full review
  • Just knowing that we are protected from attacks is our main objective and so far that sense of security is well worth the cost associated with it.
Read full review
  • Securonix Next-Generation SIEM has reduced the amount of overhead required for environment monitoring by 15%!
Read full review
ScreenShots

Datadog Screenshots

Screenshot of the out-of-the-box and customizable monitoring dashboards.Screenshot of Datadog's collaboration features, where users can discuss issues in-context with production data, annotate changes and notify their teams, see who responded to that alert before, and discover what was done to fix it.Screenshot of where Datadog unifies traces, metrics, and logs—the three pillars of observability.Screenshot of some of Datadog's 400+ built-in integrations.Screenshot of Datadog's Service Map, which decomposes an application into all its component services and draws the observed dependencies between these services in real timeScreenshot of centralized log data, pulled from any source.